Temporary restraining order for guns

j8F4M.jpg
 
katzgar said:
I see you dont understand either
Click to expand...
Oh, but I do. You're crying because you can't take guns away from law abiding Americans.

You see, fuckface, I understand better than you ever could.

Now, go find some gasoline and a match and have yourself a nice little flag barbecue. ;)
 
Granule said:
Oh, but I do. You're crying because you can't take guns away from law abiding Americans.

You see, fuckface, I understand better than you ever could.

Now, go find some gasoline and a match and have yourself a nice little flag barbecue. ;)
Click to expand...


stay out of churches
 
domer76 said:
Not a bright little toad, are you?
Click to expand...

figures, dumber and domer chime in same opinion.

Here's an idea, why don't you and the trailer park queen be assigned to serve the restraining orders on the nuts, demand they hand over their guns to you, then you can bring them into the station all locked and secured, problem solved.

WOW, you guys are amazing minds :rofl2:
between the two of you there exists the brain of a mouse
 
evince said:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/temporary-restraining-order-guns-stop-mass-shootings/story?id=51042163
Click to expand...

"Where ERPOs are believed to be most often effective is in stemming suicides. For example, Everytown cites a study of the law in Connecticut (where it has been in place the longest) that states that from 1999 to 2013, “For every 10 or 11 gun removal cases, one suicide was averted -- an estimated 72 averted suicides.”"

this is a perfect example of what is wrong with such laws. You are not 'averting' a suicide with such laws. If someone is intent upon ending their life, they will do so.

You also note that they took the guns from 11, but only claim to have averted 1. So what about the other 10?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top