New electoral college system

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Since we have one party in the political system intent on exploiting the racial resentment within one single ethnic group in order to dominate elections, and nothing could be clearer than the fact that this is destructive to national unity, I think we need to change to an electoral college system that forces a party to appeal to an ethnically diverse audience, rather than pandering to one race constantly and ignoring all others.

In light of this, I propose the following system. There will be 100 electors. 50 will be apportioned proportional to the popular vote. 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of blacks, 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of Latinos, 10 will be apportioned to the one that wins the majority of Asians, and 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of whites.

This will force any party that wishes to subside solely by pitting one of these groups against all the others to die, and to broaden is appeal to include all Americans.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

All senate seats and representative seats should be apportioned by a similiar formula. All judges are immediately dismissed and appointed by the president that wins the first election under this system.

 

[TTQ64]

Why not 1 man/woman 1 vote.

Winner takes all. No need for a electoral college.

 

[RB 60]

Since we have one party in the political system intent on exploiting the racial resentment within one single ethnic group in order to dominate elections, and nothing could be clearer than the fact that this is destructive to national unity, I think we need to change to an electoral college system that forces a party to appeal to an ethnically diverse audience, rather than pandering to one race constantly and ignoring all others.

In light of this, I propose the following system. There will be 100 electors. 50 will be apportioned proportional to the popular vote. 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of blacks, 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of Latinos, 10 will be apportioned to the one that wins the majority of Asians, and 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of whites.

This will force any party that wishes to subside solely by pitting one of these groups against all the others to die, and to broaden is appeal to include all Americans.

Further evidence meth destroys the thought process...

 

[Peridot]

Since we have one party in the political system intent on exploiting the racial resentment within one single ethnic group in order to dominate elections, and nothing could be clearer than the fact that this is destructive to national unity, I think we need to change to an electoral college system that forces a party to appeal to an ethnically diverse audience, rather than pandering to one race constantly and ignoring all others.

In light of this, I propose the following system. There will be 100 electors. 50 will be apportioned proportional to the popular vote. 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of blacks, 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of Latinos, 10 will be apportioned to the one that wins the majority of Asians, and 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of whites.

This will force any party that wishes to subside solely by pitting one of these groups against all the others to die, and to broaden is appeal to include all Americans.

As of 2010, Latinos are white.

 

[Truth Detector]

Since we have one party in the political system intent on exploiting the racial resentment within one single ethnic group in order to dominate elections,

The above is nothing less than a massive lie and a liberal straw man. Why do liberals have to lie about everything?

and nothing could be clearer than the fact that this is destructive to national unity,

The destruction to national unity lies with liberals and the Democratic Party of the jackass who, because they cannot accept the results of an election, denigrate the electoral process and the office of the President while repugnantly engaging in America bashing and providing the enemies of freedom comfort and support.

I think we need to change to an electoral college system that forces a party to appeal to an ethnically diverse audience, rather than pandering to one race constantly and ignoring all others.

In other words, you're an uneducated Fascist dumbfuck on steroids. Liberals have to be the dumbest people on the planet.

In light of this, I propose the following system. There will be 100 electors. 50 will be apportioned proportional to the popular vote. 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of blacks, 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of Latinos, 10 will be apportioned to the one that wins the majority of Asians, and 10 will be apportioned to the candidate that wins the majority of whites.

A much better suggestion would be you shoving your head between your legs and jumping.

This will force any party that wishes to subside solely by pitting one of these groups against all the others to die, and to broaden is appeal to include all Americans.

Another lie and straw man; you're quite full of them.

Food for thought, assuming you're capable of thought, when the first black man won the Presidency, idiots like you were just fine with the electoral process and you didn't see Republicans demanding we change the system. Why do you think that was?

 

[Truth Detector]

All senate seats and representative seats should be apportioned by a similiar formula. All judges are immediately dismissed and appointed by the president that wins the first election under this system.

 

[Truth Detector]

Why not 1 man/woman 1 vote.

Winner takes all. No need for a electoral college.

Another clueless dunce who learned nothing in school about our Republic or civics.

Yep, Fascists love the idea of mob rule.

 

[TTQ64]

1 person 1 vote.

racist white wing would never get into office.

Why do we need to cater to them? Why should we cater to their hate, violence and greed?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Please present any schemes you sore losers may have for review for a Constitutional Amendment. Go forth and prosper. It's a smashing idea. Run with it. Get out of your mama's basement and take your idea forward

 

[Cypress]

Please present any schemes you sore losers may have for review for a Constitutional Amendment. Go forth and prosper. It's a smashing idea. Run with it. Get out of your mama's basement and take your idea forward

Americans overwhelmingly believe popular vote should decide the president

More Americans support the popular vote over the Electoral College as the method for electing U.S. presidents, but a majority thinks the 2016 electors should cast their vote for the candidate who won the most votes in their state. Currently, Hillary Clinton is ahead in the popular vote, while Donald Trump, the president-elect, leads in electoral votes.

By 54 percent to 41 percent, more Americans favor amending the Constitution to elect the U.S. president by popular vote (most votes cast in the entire country) rather than the Electoral College. The public has held this view going back to 1987, including in 2000 after that year’s election also resulted in a difference between the popular and electoral votes.

continued https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-more-americans-believe-popular-vote-should-decide-the-president/

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Quote Originally Posted by Cool 90's Kid View Post
Since we have one party in the political system intent on exploiting the racial resentment within one single ethnic group in order to dominate elections,

I'm surprised you want to put the demmycrats out of business......I thought you liked them......

 

[Русский агент]

Americans overwhelmingly believe popular vote should decide the president

A poll.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

More Americans support the popular vote over the Electoral College as the method for electing U.S. presidents

like Hilliary voters, most of them live in California......

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Why not 1 man/woman 1 vote.

Winner takes all. No need for a electoral college.

Tbh I'm just being a dick. It's totally absurd to think that rural whites are the people in our system that need an exaggerated voice in our political system. But because that benefits one side in the political system, it can't be changed.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

We don't need a constitutional amendment. We can't abide by one side forcing a dictatorship on us because they block any attempt to form a supermajority. They rig the elections via gerrymandering and the electoral college, and then they expect us to use those same rigged elections to change the political system. Ridiculous. What we need is a revolution. The old political system must go by force, because Republicans cannot be counted on to do anything not in their political interest, even if its to the detriment of the nation.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

like Hilliary voters, most of them live in California......

Unlike Republican voters, all of them aren't white.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

I'm surprised you want to put the demmycrats out of business......I thought you liked them......

Democrats win more than a single ethnic group. It's the rest of the nation vs. white supremacists.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Fuck the states. The states are a system whites gerrymandered to benefit themselves, as they arrived first and took all the land in rural areas, rigging things towards the rural areas is a way to benefit themselves.

 

[RB 60]

What we need is a revolution.

You're more than welcomed to start one.