The sad part is that the North tried to compromise, they were not trying to free the deep South, they were simply trying to prevent slavery from expanding to the new parts of America.
The 3/5ths compromise was already tried. All this time we thought John Kelly was a voice of reason, but he's just another white supremacist. And I don't use that term loosely.
The sad part is that the North tried to compromise, they were not trying to free the deep South, they were simply trying to prevent slavery from expanding to the new parts of America.
The "compromise" the south offered was 'we free the slaves and you pay us more money for producing cotton so we can pay the help'
does that make sense to you?
of course not
Interesting question in the thread title, then the OP statement blows it. Does the OP author even understand that slavery was an institution of the Democrat Party?
The Conservative Democrat Party, you didn't really think the Radical Republicans were conservative did you?
The early Democratic Party was racist. That changed in the 1960’s!
I mean, technically what he said was correct
The 3/5ths compromise was already tried. All this time we thought John Kelly was a voice of reason, but he's just another white supremacist. And I don't use that term loosely.
Compromise isn't saying do it our way or else, son.
Well actually Kelly was right. The genius of American politics is our ability to compromise to get things done. The Civil War is just one example where that ability to compromise failed badly.
There were all sorts of compromises that could have been made to compromise on slavery. Restitution, relocation, graduated emancipation, permitting slavery to expand, in some manner, into the territories, etc,. So there we failed badly.
What Kelly is glossing over is that the reason we failed so badly is that no society in human history has willingly given up an investment in capital (human slaves) that large peacefully in human history. The slave owning States were intransigent about giving up that capital even if dully compensated for it. That made room for compromise pretty small.
Well actually Kelly was right. The genius of American politics is our ability to compromise to get things done. The Civil War is just one example where that ability to compromise failed badly.
There were all sorts of compromises that could have been made to compromise on slavery. Restitution, relocation, graduated emancipation, permitting slavery to expand, in some manner, into the territories, etc,. So there we failed badly.
What Kelly is glossing over is that the reason we failed so badly is that no society in human history has willingly given up an investment in capital (human slaves) that large peacefully in human history. The slave owning States were intransigent about giving up that capital even if dully compensated for it. That made room for compromise pretty small.