Obamas DOJ was in the bag for Hillary

If Jeff Sessions wasn't worthless he'd open an investigation into Comey because one is certainly warranted.

And it would throw a wrench into Mueller's witch hunt at the same time.
 
Getin the ring said:
Long before the investigation into Hillary's emails was concluded Comey was already marching to his orders to clear her.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...efore-completing-interviews-fbi-confirms.html
Click to expand...

That's why he fixed the election for Fart, eh? incidentally, I find it typical of the gross male-chauvinism of the USA that the racists and other extremists find it normal to call a person they've never even met - and hardly could except during an election - by her Christian name, as if they were old mates.
 
Calls for Comey to return to Capitol Hill for questioning have mounted, including from Graham who said he would subpoena Comey if he had to.

“He’s coming one way or the other,” Graham told Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom” on Sept. 14.
 
iolo said:
That's why he fixed the election for Fart, eh? incidentally, I find it typical of the gross male-chauvinism of the USA that the racists and other extremists find it normal to call a person they've never even met - and hardly could except during an election - by her Christian name, as if they were old mates.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't it be more chauvinist to call her by her surname? :cof1:
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy



On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]
A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]
 
Goodling resignation[edit]
Main article: Monica Goodling
Sampson's replacement as the Attorney General's temporary chief of staff was U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Chuck Rosenberg. Rosenberg initiated a DOJ inquiry into possibly inappropriate political considerations in Monica Goodling's hiring practices for civil service staff. Civil service positions are not political appointments and must be made on a nonpartisan basis. In one example, Jeffrey A. Taylor, former interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, tried to hire a new career prosecutor, Seth Adam Meinero, in the fall of 2006. Goodling judged Meinero too "liberal" and declined to approve the hire.[95] Meinero, a Howard University law school graduate who had worked on civil rights cases at the Environmental Protection Agency, was serving as a special assistant prosecutor in Taylor's office. Taylor went around Goodling, and demanded Sampson's approval to make the hire. In another example, Goodling removed an attorney from her job at the Department of Justice because she was rumored to be a lesbian, and, further, blocked the attorney from getting other Justice Department jobs she was qualified for.[96] Rules concerning hiring at the Justice department forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation.
On March 26, 2007, Goodling, who had helped coordinate the dismissal of the attorneys with the White House, took leave from her job as counsel to the attorney general and as the Justice Department's liaison to the White House.[97][98] Goodling was set to testify before Congress, but on March 26, 2007, Goodling cancelled her appearance at the Congressional hearing, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.[99] On April 6, 2007, Ms. Goodling resigned from the Department of Justice.[97]
On April 25, 2007, the House Judiciary Committee passed a resolution, by a 32–6 vote, authorizing lawyers for the House to apply for a court order granting Goodling immunity in exchange for her testimony and authorizing a subpoena for her.[100] On May 11, 2007, U.S. District Court Chief Judge Thomas Hogan signed an order granting Goodling immunity in exchange for her truthful testimony in the U.S. Attorney firings investigation, stating that "Goodling may not refuse to testify, and may not refuse to provide other information, when compelled to do so" before the Committee.[101]
 
Same worn topic, another focus, same conspiracy, merits saying again, anything to deflect away from rationalizing/defending their President, so predictable, as long as this Administration continues to blunder its way through the Clinton/Obama scapegoating obsession will never fade

And before you start with the "they can't address my questions," your questions, conspiracies, and inneundos have been getting attention for nine years straight, we've had 24/7 right wing media coverage and umpteen redundant GOP investigations and yet nothing, zilch, zero has ever been proven. Either conservatives are the world's worst investigators, or, nothing existed to begin with, I think common sense dictates the later

Besides, where would a good conservative be without there existential threat
 
The truth will come out,

the brain dead that still defend Obama and Clinton, the corruptness going on in the DOJ during the election was so bad it became almost surreal.

Justice won however as Hillary was defeated, and so goes Obamas legacy with her.

History will bare out just how despicable this team was top to bottom. What's left is to uncover is simply the details.
And here they come.
 
iolo said:
I call her Mrs Clinto, as I would address her. Don't you have any manners over there?
Click to expand...

Odd, since that's not her surname.

What we don't have is centuries of subjugation by England. That's what the impotent Welsh have. Perhaps knuckling your foreheads to your masters on command is considered "mannerly" by the craven sons of St. Davy.
 
Getin the ring said:
The truth will come out,

the brain dead that still defend Obama and Clinton, the corruptness going on in the DOJ during the election was so bad it became almost surreal.

Justice won however as Hillary was defeated, and so goes Obamas legacy with her.

History will bare out just how despicable this team was top to bottom. What's left is to uncover is simply the details.
And here they come.
Click to expand...

The truth is already out, but is being covered up by everyone, Trump included. Hillary put 100 percent of the State Depts business online for anyone who was looking to see. It was and is illegal, so if she is not under arrest by now she never will be
 
If anyone seriously prefers Mr Trump for any elective office at all, they must certainly be in Russian pay, and I hope it's good enough to overcome the puking! :)
 
evince said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy



On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]
A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]
Click to expand...

this is what a DOJ being in the bag for someone looks like folks
 
it was created to kill AACORN

AACORN registered poor and minority voters.


the BUSH DOJ LIED AACORN to death
 
iolo said:
If anyone seriously prefers Mr Trump for any elective office at all, they must certainly be in Russian pay, and I hope it's good enough to overcome the puking!
Click to expand...

Enough people preferred him to Hillary, so there's that.

Have you set fire to any Englishmen's second homes, lately?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top