DEMS not the party of women, you were lied to ladies, reaction to Weinstein proves it

If Dems are not the party of women's rights, then what is the party of women's rights? Don't point to Republicans, because women aren't buying it.
 
What Democrat hired Weinstein as an advisor in the White House after he was fired for sexual harassment?
 
Brad said:
What Democrat hired Weinstein as an advisor in the White House after he was fired for sexual harassment?
Click to expand...

Silly Comrade Brad Jarod, there is no DEMOCRAT in the White House to hire Weinstein - thank God.

The former occupants delivered their young daughter to DEMOCRAT bundler Weinstein, though.

They happily pimped their own little girl to a known sexual abuser - to serve under him as an intern.

You know what powerful DEMOCRATS do to interns, don't you, Comrade Brad Jarod?
 
Amadoofus said:
If Dems are not the party of women's rights, then what is the party of women's rights? Don't point to Republicans, because women aren't buying it.
Click to expand...

Here's something you don't often have, Canadian - it's called a "thought": What if women are not a monolithic voting bloc who pledge allegiance to any party based on their sexual determination?

What if you aren't the arbiter of what women will or won't "buy"?

I guess it's hard for someone who clings to the precepts of identity politics to view women as individuals, but outside the world of TV fiction and comic books women are people who vote the way they want.

After Weinstein, I suspect the Jackass Party will have a hard time convincing most voters that they "stand for women".
 
God bless America said:
Here's something you don't often have, Canadian - it's called a "thought": What if women are not a monolithic voting bloc who pledge allegiance to any party based on their sexual determination?

What if you aren't the arbiter of what women will or won't "buy"?

I guess it's hard for someone who clings to the precepts of identity politics to view women as individuals, but outside the world of TV fiction and comic books women are people who vote the way they want.

After Weinstein, I suspect the Jackass Party will have a hard time convincing most voters that they "stand for women".
Click to expand...

The Republican party stands for... well, not much of anything. Trump, a sexual predator and twice accused rapist, is the moral leader.
 
3RFTOap.png



1998: Bill Clinton would bomb Iraq, not bomb bin Laden, be impeached in the House for perjury and obstruction of justice, plan to bomb Serbia, so busy.

Still had time to live it up at Camp David with DEMOCRATS Ben Affleck, Harvey Weinstein and other donors. Money bought access.
 
Amadeus said:
If Dems are not the party of women's rights, then what is the party of women's rights? Don't point to Republicans, because women aren't buying it.
Click to expand...

Amadeus said:
The Republican party stands for... well, not much of anything. Trump, a sexual predator and twice accused rapist, is the moral leader.
Click to expand...

Amadeus said:
Trump is also an admirer of Hitler.
Click to expand...

Gosh, can you just once justify your opinions with some factual basis?
 
Right said:
You still need to have some facts to base your opinion, or else your opinion is pure bullshit.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Since the Canadian dishwasher admits that he gets his worldview from TV miniseries and comic books - pure fantasy - nobody should be surprised that he spouts pure fiction.
 
Booyah! said:
JfS3Q5Y.jpg
Click to expand...

[SUP]
[/SUP]"At least one of the women Donald Trump invited as his guest to the debate Sunday night as part of his effort to paint Bill and Hillary Clinton as victimizers of women received a cash payment from a pro-Trump organization.


A super PAC founded by former Trump campaign senior advisor Roger Stone has paid $2,500 to Kathy Shelton, an Arkansas woman sexually assaulted as a child by a man whom Hillary Clinton was appointed to represent in court. Trump called out Clinton for her work on the case during a testy exchange Sunday, as he sought to deflect attention from the recently disclosed video in which Trump appears to brag about sexually assaulting woman.

The payment, first reported by the Associated Press, came in May from the Committee to Restore America's Greatness PAC. Campaign finance records describe it as being made for "contract labor.” Stone told the AP that Shelton "was extensively interviewed on video about her experience with Hillary Clinton and was paid for her time."


[SUP]http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-campaign-2016-updates-morning-woman-who-accuses-the-clintons-got-paid-1476109925-htmlstory.html
[/SUP]
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That's right. There is a huge difference between a woman voluntarily showing herself in a sexual position (like the examples shown in one post with Madonna, Miley, etc.), and a woman shown being attacked or molested by others with the impression being given to the viewer that it is against her will. For that reason I don't think that pornography is necessarily a bad thing. It all depends if the people taking part in the photos or videos are willing participants.
Click to expand...
well yeah......the ones in the first instance are doing it for money......and the ones in the later instance get the money not to tell anyone Weinstein did it........
 
Covfefe said:
That may have been the case in the beginning, but anyone who supports Trump at this point supports systemic racism, it isn't a generalization, it's a sad fact.
Click to expand...

gosh, that is so incredibly stupid.......if I didn't already know it, I could use that stupidity as proof you're a lib'rul......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top