Clinton warns Harris, Warren would face 'double standard' in 2020

Would that be the same pollsters who said the Hildebeast would win in a landslide, skank?


Screen-Shot-2016-08-10-at-7.42.08-PM.png

he is a renouned expert

its more proof you shits cheated wioth the russians help
 
Oroginally you failed to mention this alleged "spitting" that he supposedly did, skank.

You changed your story later, didn't you, skank?

Several times, as I recall, skank.

I have your quotes to prove it, skank.

Facts, skank.

go start a thread about it shitlips
 
To pretend women are treated fairly by the media is kinda counter to all your harvey rants huh dickwits
 
To pretend women are treated fairly by the media is kinda counter to all your harvey rants huh dickwits

true there was way more negative coverage of hillary than trump. oooohh waiiitt.

I think we can all agree that sex doesnt matter. The media covers for democrats regardless of sex and targets republicans regardless of sex.
 
there were lies touted about hilary

the shit said about trumpy was not lies


I dont recall anyone saying trump was too ugly to assault
 
People are willing to vote for a woman, they just weren't enthusiastic about Clinton for a variety of reasons (some real, some imagined). Clinton ultimately was a centrist who didn't stand for anything, and was easily moved to the left by Sanders. No one found it convincing because she had a long history of being a center-right type.

I don't think Clinton was an especially bad person, but she was seen as a step backward from Obama at best. She couldn't maintain the coalition, and Sanders rightly or wrongly proved the more exciting choice; and when he lost, the enthusiasm didn't transfer to Clinton.

Sexism is real, but so is not liking Clinton for legitimate reasons.
 
Also, Warren will have a tough race if she runs. I was a very enthusiastic Warren supporter before she entered politics, but she has burned her credibility on a number of issues.
 
People are willing to vote for a woman, they just weren't enthusiastic about Clinton for a variety of reasons (some real, some imagined). Clinton ultimately was a centrist who didn't stand for anything, and was easily moved to the left by Sanders. No one found it convincing because she had a long history of being a center-right type.

I don't think Clinton was an especially bad person, but she was seen as a step backward from Obama at best. She couldn't maintain the coalition, and Sanders rightly or wrongly proved the more exciting choice; and when he lost, the enthusiasm didn't transfer to Clinton.

Sexism is real, but so is not liking Clinton for legitimate reasons.

she won the election


we were cheated

dont blame her for it
 
she won the election


we were cheated

dont blame her for it

Hillary deserves some blame, because she couldn't beat Trump. She was a better candidate by several orders of magnitude. And she would have been a gift to the right-wing, far more than Trump. She actually believes in neo-liberal, Reagan-derived economic policies and she could have gathered bi-partisan support for them. Meanwhile Trump sits on his toadstool with Twitter his hand jacking off to the latest wedge issue.
 
Hillary deserves some blame, because she couldn't beat Trump. She was a better candidate by several orders of magnitude. And she would have been a gift to the right-wing, far more than Trump. She actually believes in neo-liberal, Reagan-derived economic policies and she could have gathered bi-partisan support for them. Meanwhile Trump sits on his toadstool with Twitter his hand jacking off to the latest wedge issue.


she won

so did Gore


and she was no gift to the right.

Itas why they hated the Clintons so much


they got shit done
 
Back
Top