And the beat goes on,

This is literally Domer's argument:

Person X, hey I have something you might be interested in.

Person B, okay, let's see it.

Domer Retard: Person B solicited Person X.

Yes, Domer is that stupid.
 
Definition, post #125, idiot.

Followed by Junior's emails.

Dismissed!

In that aspect, you are being dismissed.
Your inability to accept facts and your desire to cling to your sinking row boat, are further proof of your failure.

Keep trying though and eventually you might get something correct; because even a blind hog can find an acorn, from time to time. :D
 
Because the Russians ASKED for the meeting, stupid.

IOW, Trump jr didn't solicit anyone, stupid liar.

With respect to Meeting Gate there are two annoying and troublesome facts for the Impeachment Enthusiasts.

The first has been gone over for 3 or pages on this thread lol: Junior was *offered* dirt on Hillary by someone who claimed to be an agent of the Russian government. No matter how giddy Junior was at the prospect of hearing it, there just isn't anything illegal in meeting with the Russians to hear them out.

Had Junior gone in search of dirt from a foreign government [kind of like the way the DNC did with the Ukrainians] that may have mattered. Or had Junior sent an agent to the Kremlin, or even the Russian embassy, to try and come up with something/anything on Hillary, that may have mattered.

Similarly, had Junior solicited help from a British spy, who then solicited dirt from Russians to publish in a dossier, to damage Hillary with, that may have mattered.

*hypocrisy alert*

But none of that went on with Junior. Junior simply went to hear what the Russians had to say. And that's ok, we aren't at war with Russia. Not to mention the whole freedom of association thing.

The second troublesome thing for the Impeachment Enthusiasts is this: nothing came of the meeting and there is zero evidence to the contrary.

Case, closed.
 
In that aspect, you are being dismissed.
Your inability to accept facts and your desire to cling to your sinking row boat, are further proof of your failure.

Keep trying though and eventually you might get something correct; because even a blind hog can find an acorn, from time to time. :D

125 idiot
 
125 idiot

Buckly has no proof, of his allegations, so he’s just------------------->
giphy.gif
 
With respect to Meeting Gate there are two annoying and troublesome facts for the Impeachment Enthusiasts.

The first has been gone over for 3 or pages on this thread lol: Junior was *offered* dirt on Hillary by someone who claimed to be an agent of the Russian government. No matter how giddy Junior was at the prospect of hearing it, there just isn't anything illegal in meeting with the Russians to hear them out.

Had Junior gone in search of dirt from a foreign government [kind of like the way the DNC did with the Ukrainians] that may have mattered. Or had Junior sent an agent to the Kremlin, or even the Russian embassy, to try and come up with something/anything on Hillary, that may have mattered.

Similarly, had Junior solicited help from a British spy, who then solicited dirt from Russians to publish in a dossier, to damage Hillary with, that may have mattered.

*hypocrisy alert*

But none of that went on with Junior. Junior simply went to hear what the Russians had to say. And that's ok, we aren't at war with Russia. Not to mention the whole freedom of association thing.

The second troublesome thing for the Impeachment Enthusiasts is this: nothing came of the meeting and there is zero evidence to the contrary.

Case, closed.

lol

The meeting has nothing to do with Daddy.

The emails speak for themselves. The meeting was a result of an INVITATION to Trump Tower. One does not just waltz in.

The definition of solicitation does not indicate "who went first".

Checkmate
 
If I email you and say I have some great weed I'd like to sell you, and you invite me to your place to try the weed, you have asked for what I was offering.

When are you going to tell us who won the 2017 World Series?
 
If I email you and say I have some great weed I'd like to sell you, and you invite me to your place to try the weed, you have asked for what I was offering.

When are you going to tell us who won the 2017 World Series?

Are you really claiming that I solicited you for weed?
 
If I email you and say I have some great weed I'd like to sell you, and you invite me to your place to try the weed, you have asked for what I was offering.

According to Domer and Althea, if their moms ask some sailors if they want some pussy, and the sailors say OK, and they go back to the sailor's place, the sailors did the soliciting. :rofl2:

When are you going to tell us who won the 2017 World Series?

False analogy.

We'll find out who wins when a team wins the best of seven games. If four games are won before all seven games have been played, the winner is declared and there are no further games.

Nobody knows the winner before the series, but the timeline for play is not infinite.

Now, when will Mueller produce anything conclusive? He has the rest of his life to investigate, and you have the rest of yours to tell yourself that indictments are just around the corner. :rofl2:
 
If I email you and say I have some great weed I'd like to sell you, and you invite me to your place to try the weed, you have asked for what I was offering.

When are you going to tell us who won the 2017 World Series?

False analogy; because you were soliciting him and offering something for sale. :palm:
 
This is literally Domer's argument:

Person X, hey I have something you might be interested in.

Person B, okay, let's see it.

Domer Retard: Person B solicited Person X.

Yes, Domer is that stupid.


125 idiot. Read it and weep.
 
Back
Top