dirty says many ppl would have done the evil jr did-he didn't name them though..
- Thread starter Bill
- Start date
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
so if a whistle blower approached you and said he had info that the DNC was accepting campaign contributions from Russian nationals you wouldn't listen?.........how about if he said he had the same info on the GOP?........would you go then?.......
If is the middle word of life, dumbass.
You raise a point, but keep in mind this wasn't just a "whistle blower" but an individual with known Kremlin ties and who has been identified in the invitation as representing the Russian Gov't. with information from the Russian Gov't.
Not quite the same scenario
evince
Truthmatters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debategate
Debategate or briefing-gate was a political scandal affecting the administration of Ronald Reagan; it took place in the final days of the 1980 presidential election. Reagan's team had somehow acquired President Jimmy Carter's briefing papers, classified top secret[1], that Carter he used in preparation for the October 28, 1980 debate with Reagan. The briefing papers were never specified to be vital strategy memos or just routine position papers. This leak of campaign papers was not divulged to the public until late June 1983, after Laurence Barrett published Gambling With History: Reagan in the White House, an in-depth account of the Reagan administration's first two years.
Debategate or briefing-gate was a political scandal affecting the administration of Ronald Reagan; it took place in the final days of the 1980 presidential election. Reagan's team had somehow acquired President Jimmy Carter's briefing papers, classified top secret[1], that Carter he used in preparation for the October 28, 1980 debate with Reagan. The briefing papers were never specified to be vital strategy memos or just routine position papers. This leak of campaign papers was not divulged to the public until late June 1983, after Laurence Barrett published Gambling With History: Reagan in the White House, an in-depth account of the Reagan administration's first two years.
evince
Truthmatters
https://australianpolitics.com/2000/10/01/gore-bush-prepare-for-debates.html
Vice-President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush are preparing for their encounter this week in the first of three televised debates that have assumed a high degree of importance given the closeness of the presidential election campaign.
The debate takes place in Boston, Massachusetts, at 9pm eastern time on Tuesday (midday Wednesday Australian eastern time).
Opinion polls indicate a see-sawing contest, some showing Gore ahead, others putting Bush in the lead. Allowing for standard margins of error, the polls indicate an election that is, in the words of the much-loved media cliche, too close to call.
The debate takes place amidst an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation into the leaking of a video of Bush practising for the debate. The tape was received in the mail by former Democratic congressman Thomas Downey on September 13. It was accompanied by a briefing book used by the Bush campaign. Downey is assisting Gore in his preparations for the debate.
It appears that the package was leaked from the office of Maverick Media, the Bush campaign’s advertising firm. Suspicion has centred on an administrative assistant at the firm, Yvette Lozano, who is recorded on security video with a package she took to the post office from where the leaked package was sent. Lozano has denied being the culprit, claiming that the package simply contained khaki pants her boss was posting home.
The Democrats appear to have handled the incident well. The video was turned over to the police soon after it was received and it is suggested that the video was only viewed to the extent necessary to determine its contents. The Democrats have suggested the package may have been part of a dirty tricks campaign to discredit them prior to the debates.
Vice-President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush are preparing for their encounter this week in the first of three televised debates that have assumed a high degree of importance given the closeness of the presidential election campaign.
The debate takes place in Boston, Massachusetts, at 9pm eastern time on Tuesday (midday Wednesday Australian eastern time).
Opinion polls indicate a see-sawing contest, some showing Gore ahead, others putting Bush in the lead. Allowing for standard margins of error, the polls indicate an election that is, in the words of the much-loved media cliche, too close to call.
The debate takes place amidst an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation into the leaking of a video of Bush practising for the debate. The tape was received in the mail by former Democratic congressman Thomas Downey on September 13. It was accompanied by a briefing book used by the Bush campaign. Downey is assisting Gore in his preparations for the debate.
It appears that the package was leaked from the office of Maverick Media, the Bush campaign’s advertising firm. Suspicion has centred on an administrative assistant at the firm, Yvette Lozano, who is recorded on security video with a package she took to the post office from where the leaked package was sent. Lozano has denied being the culprit, claiming that the package simply contained khaki pants her boss was posting home.
The Democrats appear to have handled the incident well. The video was turned over to the police soon after it was received and it is suggested that the video was only viewed to the extent necessary to determine its contents. The Democrats have suggested the package may have been part of a dirty tricks campaign to discredit them prior to the debates.
^Whistleblower? What a pathetically laughable spin! Couple with more "if/then" horseshit.
Dolt
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
This is really one of the sadder excuses I've heard in the litany of trial balloons the admin and its lapdogs have put out there this week.
It's like saying that if most people saw someone drop their wallet, they'd pick it up and take it & keep the money for themselves.
It's like saying that if most people saw someone drop their wallet, they'd pick it up and take it & keep the money for themselves.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
/Bill, staggering from his inability to answer the question posed to him.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
doesn't the fact she was identified as someone who worked for the Russian government make it MORE likely she would have accurate information about Russian nationalists donating money to the DNC?.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
stop trying to make this about Hilliary........
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Well, all of that "dishonesty" and "corruption" stuff that you guys have thrown at her for years is kind of out the window now, right?
I mean, is there really a difference w/ Trump when it comes to those qualities?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
why would it be out the window?......she was (is) obviously dishonest and corrupt......if you find anything Trump did that was either dishonest or corrupt you be sure to let us know.....
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Only you would say it was a whistle blower rather than`the Russian version of Nigerian email scammers.
A bright, shiny object was dangled in front of dumb Donnie and he grabbed it. An ethical person would have been highly suspicious but then the trumps aren't known for their ethics.
trump university for starters.....
Shove the whistle old fool.........
Now you happy, you got your answer......