Renewable Energy Sets Record in USA

zappasguitar

Well-known member
...and Milagro's head exploded.


US breaks record in wind and solar power energy


The U.S. has broken its own energy record: 10 percent of all electricity generated in the country in March came from wind and solar power, according to a recent report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The number is up from last year, in which wind and solar power generated an annual average of seven percent of the country's electricity, the report from Electric Power Monthly shows based upon March.

Where and When Is Wind And Solar Power Generated?

Wind patterns are different, depending on the location. States like Texas and Oklahoma and others in the region typically have the highest output in spring months. But California wind-powered generators often have their highest output in the summer. Meanwhile, monthly solar output is highest in the summer no matter the location because of the longer daylight hours.

EIA predicts wind and solar power will generate over 10 percent of U.S. electricity in April 2017, and will decrease to less than 10 percent in the summer months. Since 2014, the agency has seen combined wind and solar generation reach its highest level in either spring or fall, since those seasons see a low electricity demand.

Texas generated the biggest amount of electricity from wind and solar power, annual data for 2016 shows. Most of the production was from wind, since the state is the biggest wind producer compared to other states, according to the EIA. In most states, wind usually makes up a larger amount of its total electricity generation than solar. However, California and Arizona had more solar generation than wind in 2016.

Trump And Wind Industry, Jobs

The report comes after President Donald Trump announced his decision to drop the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement.

However, the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) doesn’t see his decision harming the wind industry.

“Despite the decision today to pull the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Accord, the wind industry expects to continue as an American economic success story,” said AWEA CEO Tom Kiernan in a statement. “Current policies will keep wind power growing rapidly through 2020, and we see many positive trends that will continue to drive demand.”

Trump previously spoke against the wind industry before becoming president.

“It's Friday. How many bald eagles did wind turbines kill today? They are an environmental & aesthetic disaster,” he tweeted in 2012.

However, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) said the fastest-growing occupations in America are wind turbine service technician jobs. U.S. wind power added jobs over nine times faster than the overall economy, according to a 2016 report by AWEA. The country saw a record last year, with more than 102,000 wind power-related jobs. In the next few years, the wind industry will account for 248,000 jobs, the report added. Between now and 2020, wind power is expected to create $85 billion in economic activity.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/us-breaks-record-in-wind-and-solar-power-energy/
 
That's sort of an odd first reaction.

Why is this a partisan issue for you? 10% is pretty solid at this stage. Anything that gets us off of foreign oil should be celebrated by all Americans.

Such silliness. Best way to get off of "foreign" oil is to drill here.

It isn't partisan. It is science. It is bogus science it is not sustainable on a grand scale. Only first graders and idiots believe it is.

It is corporate welfare but you like it
 
Such silliness. Best way to get off of "foreign" oil is to drill here.

It isn't partisan. It is science. It is bogus science it is not sustainable on a grand scale. Only first graders and idiots believe it is.

It is corporate welfare but you like it

Not yet. Efficiencies are increasing all of the time and the only real problem still to be solved is long term storage of that energy. That is improving steadily. I can see a day (maybe not in my lifetime but future generations) there will be no reason to
burn fossil fuels for power. We will still need them for manufacturing etc, but not power. Just my view.
 
No matter how many times you say it, you have to repeat it wind and solar are not replacing fossil fuels they are displacing them. Because of the nature of those forms of energy they are used first in preference to more reliable dispatchable energy from CCGT power stations. It's all smoke and mirrors, take away the subsidies and wind power would die overnight.

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Not yet. Efficiencies are increasing all of the time and the only real problem still to be solved is long term storage of that energy. That is improving steadily. I can see a day (maybe not in my lifetime but future generations) there will be no reason to
burn fossil fuels for power. We will still need them for manufacturing etc, but not power. Just my view.

Wrong.

First of all there are three main problems

1) the law of thermodynamics
2) the storage problem you mention which is no small problem
3) you are putting your energy hopes on the weather which every first grader knows is unpredictable.

We have a better chance of powering our country with unicorn farts
 
Wrong.

First of all there are three main problems

1) the law of thermodynamics
2) the storage problem you mention which is no small problem
3) you are putting your energy hopes on the weather which every first grader knows is unpredictable.

We have a better chance of powering our country with unicorn farts

And what laws of thermodynamics are being broken there genius? This ought to be good. And ah, what do think the storage is for? Unpredictable weather maybe? Do you really understand any of this?
 
Not yet. Efficiencies are increasing all of the time and the only real problem still to be solved is long term storage of that energy. That is improving steadily. I can see a day (maybe not in my lifetime but future generations) there will be no reason to
burn fossil fuels for power. We will still need them for manufacturing etc, but not power. Just my view.
To make wind turbines you need large amounts of rare earths like neodymium produced in China which is incredibly polluting. You also need coal to make the steel so when you add it up they are not so environmentally friendly as portrayed by the likes of Zippy.

http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/analysis/big-winds-dirty-little-secret-rare-earth-minerals/

Sent from my iPhone 25 GT Turbo
 
Such silliness. Best way to get off of "foreign" oil is to drill here.

It isn't partisan. It is science. It is bogus science it is not sustainable on a grand scale. Only first graders and idiots believe it is.

It is corporate welfare but you like it

If it is "science" then provide the proof that backs your claim that it's "not sustainable on a grand scale".
 
Such silliness. Best way to get off of "foreign" oil is to drill here.

It isn't partisan. It is science. It is bogus science it is not sustainable on a grand scale. Only first graders and idiots believe it is.

It is corporate welfare but you like it

I'm for domestic drilling. And the oil industry receives ridiculous subsidies.

Why would you be against renewables? Why not throw everything at it?

Don't answer. Because you see renewables as a "left" thing - so you knee-jerk oppose them. Such silliness.
 
Back
Top