The next step in this "war"?

cawacko

cawacko

Well-known member
If the desire is to have a "civil war" is it to be decided at the ballot box or by weapons on the streets? For those that desire this "war" what is your preference?
 
I vote for a food fight.

Dems might want something more substantial though...
"If they bring a knife, we bring a gun."
Barry Sotero
 
Stretch said:
Well, we had better bring a lot of food then! LOL ;)
Click to expand...
I get the joke..I just can't bring myself to laugh.
The intolerance in this county is intolerable ..There are (too) many who exist in the political sphere just to hate
 
Nothings going to happen, people are being tards. No state is going to vote for war and without the states it'll just be a bunch of autists slapping each other in the street.
 
(((Tony Blair))) said:
Nothings going to happen, people are being tards. No state is going to vote for war and without the states it'll just be a bunch of autists slapping each other in the street.
Click to expand...
what? "slapping each other??" is what you call it? this thread isn't about you're desire for another civil war.
 
anatta said:
I get the joke..I just can't bring myself to laugh.
The intolerance in this county is intolerable ..There are (too) many who exist in the political sphere just to hate
Click to expand...

I know and I agree. It's as serious as could possibly could be.
 
When congressmen can amorally vote for a healthcare bill that they know full well will kill tens of thousands if it is passed and signed into law, in an age where anyone , with any mental capacity, can own any kind of weapon they must expect there could be repercussions to their deadly votes.
If they vote to kill, they need to be ready to die or stay under armed guard in flack jackets and bulletproof armor 24/7 .
That is the reality .
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
When congressmen can amorally vote for a healthcare bill that they know full well will kill tens of thousands if it is passed and signed into law, in an age where anyone , with any mental capacity, can own any kind of weapon they must expect there could be repercussions to their deadly votes.
If they vote to kill, they need to be ready to die or stay under armed guard in flack jackets and bulletproof armor 24/7 .
That is the reality .
Click to expand...

Looks like abortion is history, too.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
When congressmen can amorally vote for a healthcare bill that they know full well will kill tens of thousands if it is passed and signed into law, in an age where anyone , with any mental capacity, can own any kind of weapon they must expect there could be repercussions to their deadly votes.
If they vote to kill, they need to be ready to die or stay under armed guard in flack jackets and bulletproof armor 24/7 .
That is the reality .
Click to expand...

I was wondering how long it would be before a demalquedacrat would defend this guy.
 
To answer the OP, I a, all for a violent, bloody civil war. Time for us patriotic Americans to thin the herd and eliminate leftists.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
No need for war. We can have an amicable divorce and go our separate ways.

But when you look at the marksmanship of this guy James T. Hodgkinson and consider he's pretty representative of liberal militants and you look at the rest of the libs... trannies, hollywierds, etc., all they really have with combat experience are the super predators.
The right has had militias for a while now, they have the NRA and most ex military are repubs.
So the left has super predators with hand guns (illegally, no doubt) and the right has many ex military trained marksmen with rifles and assault weapons. I know whose side I'll be on.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
When congressmen can amorally vote for a healthcare bill that they know full well will kill tens of thousands if it is passed and signed into law, in an age where anyone , with any mental capacity, can own any kind of weapon they must expect there could be repercussions to their deadly votes.
If they vote to kill, they need to be ready to die or stay under armed guard in flack jackets and bulletproof armor 24/7 .
That is the reality .
Click to expand...

:translation:

tantrum.gif


:/translation:
 
aloysious said:
No need for war. We can have an amicable divorce and go our separate ways.

But when you look at the marksmanship of this guy James T. Hodgkinson and consider he's pretty representative of liberal militants and you look at the rest of the libs... trannies, hollywierds, etc., all they really have with combat experience are the super predators.
The right has had militias for a while now, they have the NRA and most ex military are repubs.
So the left has super predators with hand guns (illegally, no doubt) and the right has many ex military trained marksmen with rifles and assault weapons. I know whose side I'll be on.
Click to expand...

It would never work; because the liberal snowflakes would demand "alimony" and would want more then 1/2 of the property. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top