Clapper Must Be 'Sniffing Glue' to Compare Russia Probe to Watergate

Thing1 said:
Oh, please. You like to think that, but it flies in the face of history & reality.

If Trump's investigation ends up with no real findings or indictments, he'll still be 3 fruitless investigations behind Hillary. And the lack of results of those investigations didn't help Hillary.

And don't try explaining how it's "different," or how Hillary is "really guilty, even though..." That's just partisan noise.
Click to expand...

Oh please, allow me to explain how it's different.

Without the first bit of actual evidence, the democrats have accused a sitting president of colluding with a foreign nation to subvert democracy.

When and where has that happened before? Did I miss it while I was out fishing or something?
 
Right said:
What would be Russia's motive for swaying the election to Trump? Didn't Clinton give them more incentive to swing it to her?
Click to expand...

Never mind that.

Where is the smoking gun evidence that Russia swayed the election to begin with? Who is in possession of it?
 
Darth Omar said:
Never mind that.

Where is the smoking gun evidence that Russia swayed the election to begin with? Who is in possession of it?
Click to expand...

You'll just have to wait like the rest of us until the trial starts and the prosecution lays out their case.
 
Darth Omar said:
Oh please, allow me to explain how it's different.

Without the first bit of actual evidence, the democrats have accused a sitting president of colluding with a foreign nation to subvert democracy.

When and where has that happened before? Did I miss it while I was out fishing or something?
Click to expand...

Why do you keep saying "the Democrats"? The FBI STARTED THIS INVESTIGATION. Prominent Republicans have also asked for it. Democrats were even upset when they found out later on that the investigation started during the campaign, but Comey only talked about Hillary's investigation.

I know your perception is that poor persecuted Trump is being treated unfairly by Democrats, but he has brought this on himself. I can't imagine if Hillary was Prez and tried to stifle the investigation and influence the head of the FBI & others to call it off, as is being widely reported and which we should get some pretty firm confirmation on tomorrow. It would be "Tarmac: the sequel."

The double-standard you guys have is so stark & obvious. There is nothing "different" about it.
 
Actually, just to point out how rotten the stench is from this---an impeachment doesn't require the same evidence as a criminal trial.

All they need is to start proceedings and get enough votes. And the media is 100% behind---this coup attempt.
 
Thing1 said:
Why do you keep saying "the Democrats"? The FBI STARTED THIS INVESTIGATION. Prominent Republicans have also asked for it. Democrats were even upset when they found out later on that the investigation started during the campaign, but Comey only talked about Hillary's investigation.

I know your perception is that poor persecuted Trump is being treated unfairly by Democrats, but he has brought this on himself. I can't imagine if Hillary was Prez and tried to stifle the investigation and influence the head of the FBI & others to call it off, as is being widely reported and which we should get some pretty firm confirmation on tomorrow. It would be "Tarmac: the sequel."

The double-standard you guys have is so stark & obvious. There is nothing "different" about it.
Click to expand...

You asked me how it was different and I told you.
 
Darth Omar said:
Actually, just to point out how rotten the stench is from this---an impeachment doesn't require the same evidence as a criminal trial.

All they need is to start proceedings and get enough votes. And the media is 100% behind---this coup attempt.
Click to expand...

Aren't you interested in justice, Darthy?
 
Thing1 said:
Ask Russia. I mean, it's hardly a secret at this point that they were pulling for a Trump win. Putin hated Hillary. Trump implied that he was a genius.
Click to expand...

Why would they be pulling for a Trump win? Didn't they get a great uranium deal from Clinton? https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
 
Darth Omar said:
Never mind that.

Where is the smoking gun evidence that Russia swayed the election to begin with? Who is in possession of it?
Click to expand...

Everyone knows that there's no evidence. I'm pointing out that there's no motive either- yet there is a motive for Russia to have supported Clinton. lol
 
Right said:
Why would they be pulling for a Trump win? Didn't they get a great uranium deal from Clinton? https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
Click to expand...

Putin despises Clinton. His first goal is to have the sanctions lifted, and his end goal is to disrupt liberal democracies and the alliances they share.
 
Amadeus said:
Putin despises Clinton. His first goal is to have the sanctions lifted, and his end goal is to disrupt liberal democracies and the alliances they share.
Click to expand...

Why would he despise someone who gave him such a sweet uranium deal?
 
Right said:
Trump's vowed to strengthen the US military, representing most of the muscle in NATO.
Click to expand...

Putin knows Trump would never lift a finger to quell Russian aggression in Europe ...
Vlad is glad...

russian-president-vladimir-putin-smiles-during-a-meeting-with-german-picture-id136334465
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top