Is Trump Trying to Provoke a Domestic Terror Attack?

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Is Trump Trying to Provoke a Domestic Terror Attack? Pundits Are Starting to Wonder
MSNBC commentator Thomas Roberts makes a compelling case.

I would not put it pass Trump either?!!

June 4, 2017
Harriet Sinclair
Posted with permission from Newsweek

President Donald Trump’s response to the terrorist attack in London Bridge has prompted an MSNBC commentator to question whether the Republican is intending to provoke a similar attack in the U.S.

Trump took to Twitter in the wake of Saturday night’s attack on London in which seven people were killed and a further 48 injured, making comments about gun crime that prompted a backlash on social media.

The president wrote: “Do you notice we are not having a gun debate right now? That's because they used knives and a truck!”
Speaking on MSNBC Sunday, anchor Thomas Roberts questioned whether the president was attempting to provoke a terror attack with his Twitter rant.

"Let's not be [politically correct] about this," Roberts said, turning to Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed and then asking: "Is the president trying to provoke a domestic terrorist attack with this Twitter rant because—only to prove himself right?"
Reed opted not to answer the question, although he did later speak about the use of Twitter as inappropriate in the aftermath of such an attack, The Hill reported.

Roberts repeated his suggestion Trump was politicizing the incident, asking former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean: "I asked this of Mayor Reed, but it seems like the president is trying to provoke something that he can politicize more for his own gain in America. Do you feel that way?”

Former President Barack Obama’s speechwriter, Jon Favreau, also questioned Trump’s stream of tweets in the wake of the attack.

"It's hard to read Trump's tweets this morning and not think that we're one domestic attack away from the most dangerous version of this guy," Favreau tweeted.

Rather than issuing a simple response to the attack, Trump followed up his initial pledge to stand with the U.K. with a number of tweets some viewed as provocative, including lashing out at London Mayor Sadiq Khan over his instructions for Londoners to remain calm in the presence of increased security and armed police on the streets.

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn defended the London mayor, stating in comments carried by The Guardian: "At this time it is more important than ever that we stay united in our communities. It is the strength of our communities that gets us through these awful times as London mayor Sadiq Khan recognised but which the current occupant in the White House has neither the grace nor the sense to grasp."


trump-cnn-berbat-deyip-basin-toplantisinda-soru-hakki-vermedi-232425-5.jpg
 
By attempting to prevent one.

No by intentionally offering only unconstitutional means he knows will not become law so that when an attack occurs as any monkey knows cannot be prevented, he can blame others, instead of doing lawful things to reduce risks.

Get it?
 
No by intentionally offering only unconstitutional means he knows will not become law so that when an attack occurs as any monkey knows cannot be prevented, he can blame others, instead of doing lawful things to reduce risks.

Get it?

Pssst...those people were murdering you in droves 15 years before The Don ran for POTUS and won. They don't need his inspiration to slaughter you.
 
Let's not be [politically correct] about this," Roberts said, turning to Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed and then asking: "Is the president trying to provoke a domestic terrorist attack with this Twitter rant because—only to prove himself right?"
ask a completely off tangent, pointless question and then set up a strawman topic
 
Trump is trying to insulate himself from any responsibility when the next inevitable attack occurs.

And why not? Its the demwits that refuse to secure the border or properly vet Muslim immigrants....while its a demonstrable fact that all Islamic acts of terror are committed by MUSLIMS. There is no need to insulate with the reality that exists. The only comfort will be the the attack will be committed in some large liberal stronghold like NY CITY, LA, Houston, Chicago....why? Because that's where the soft targets are located.
 
And why not? Its the demwits that refuse to secure the border or properly vet Muslim immigrants....while its a demonstrable fact that all Islamic acts of terror are committed by MUSLIMS. There is no need to insulate with the reality that exists. The only comfort will be the the attack will be committed in some large liberal stronghold like NY CITY, LA, Houston, Chicago....why? Because that's where the soft targets are located.

No, Obama slaughtered terrorists in war and we applaud. We want to keep America free. So our terrorism law itself needs to be legal.

Try again. You don't own safety. Remember 9-11? Gee, remind me who was potus. How many people killed in USA on obamas 8 year tenure? Very few.

Being patriotic is not being fascist. We must walk a fine and reasonable line in these dangerous times. Yours is the party pulling on the leash. We, the real power, let you snap and slobber. Do not bite the hand that feeds you.
 
His tweet-fest since the attack has been his most disgusting yet, imo.

Anyone who confuses this w/ "leadership" really needs to stop voting. Trump is a full-blown idiot.
 
I'm glad he's fighting islamic terror. Some would rather he bow to it like obama did.

Yeah - he's a real twitter warrior.

ISIS was fairly decimated under Obama. 10's of thousands killed, most of the leadership, and over 40% of their territory lost. But Trump does sound really tough in his tweets.
 
Back
Top