SCOTUS kills gerrymandering republicans dead

Justices Reject 2 Gerrymandered North Carolina Districts, Citing Racial Bias



By ADAM LIPTAKMAY 22, 2017
 
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court struck down two North Carolina congressional districts on Monday, ruling that lawmakers had violated the Constitution by relying too heavily on race in drawing them, in a decision that could affect many voting maps, generally in the South.
The decision was handed down by an unusual coalition of justices, and was the latest in a series of setbacks for Republican-led legislatures. In recent cases concerning legislative maps in Alabama and Virginia, as well, the Supreme Court has insisted that packing black voters into a few districts — which dilutes their voting power — violates the Constitution.
Republicans in the North Carolina legislature denied that race was the predominant factor in redrawing the boundaries of the two districts under review. In one of them, though, they said, they had made some use of race.
The lawmakers said they had tried to comply with the Voting Rights Act, which in some settings requires that black voters be concentrated in numbers sufficient to provide them with an opportunity to elect their preferred candidates. But critics of the voting map said the legislature was actually trying to diminish the number of districts in the state that could be won by Democrats.
 
The ruling on Monday was the second Supreme Court victory for North Carolina Democrats this month. Last Monday, the justices declined to hear an appeal of a decision that had struck down parts of a restrictive North Carolina voting law that, among other things, tightened voter identification requirements and cut back on early voting.
A federal appeals court had ruled that the restrictions were an unconstitutional effort to “target African-Americans with almost surgical precision.”
The Supreme Court will soon consider yet another North Carolina election law appeal, this one from a federal trial court’s decision that found some of the state’s General Assembly districts had been tainted by unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.
 
Federal Judges writing laws again even though the constitution says "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states".
 
Desh what would not be racist in determining voting districts? The VRA requires certain majority minority districts which even some liberal publications have said actually hurt blacks and Democrats.
 
Justices Reject 2 Gerrymandered North Carolina Districts, Citing Racial Bias



By ADAM LIPTAKMAY 22, 2017

Yet the two poorest districts and biggest using food stamp areas in NC are a purposely gerrymandered black district. Just another example of catering to people that without help of the government wouldn't be able to do anything. Sad part is they think they actually did it own their own.
 
200px-WorldWarII-DeathsByAlliance-Piechart.png
 
Back
Top