Dope
New study in Nature shows pause is real
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Dope
Still losing there PackD. It is in your DNA, no need to feel completely responsible.
Now, back to the question you seem to be avoiding there "Climate" specialist. How about a fucking answer?
No one is denying climate change is real. Like I said, you as a cubicle dweller would not know if it was or not. That being said, the problem is the Al Gorian hype, hissy fit and exaggeration . How about you name just ONE prediction that has been accurate? Here, let me help you. Not fucking one of them. Somebody, more than likely a liberal like Al Gore is making lots of money off the fear and hype here. Facts however are not proving out anywhere near what they have or are projecting.
So how about you idiot, get on board with the reality of the situation.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
First apologize to me for the invective by removing it all from the request and I will condescend to respond and educate you..
You haven't grown up a bit.chirp chirp sound the crickets
Milagro or Tom or whatever the f your name is.
You sent me a PM with the title "Dishonest Cunt".
I deleted it without reading it, and you should know I never read any PMs from anybody except my friends.
I will never read any PM you send me.
I suggest you get a hold of your anger and message board addiction. The British national health service I am sure provides free mental health counseling. Good luck!
You sent me a PM with the title "Dishonest Cunt".
I deleted it without reading it, and you should know I never read any PMs from anybody except my friends.
I will never read any PM you send me.
I suggest you get a hold of your anger and message board addiction. The British national health service I am sure provides free mental health counseling. Good luck!
Last edited:
Ridiculous." Scientists don't get out and breathe the fresh clean air"
"Global warming exists but it paused, let's discuss a pause instead. There damn sure was a pause, therefore big oil wins!"
Seriously, these are debate points? Not surprised such idiots might stalk you.
Well, well. I think Milagro just provided a new name for himself - DC = Dishonest Cunt. It suits him.
You're too thick to understand that the pause proved that natural variability was far greater than models were assuming and were therefore overestimating anthropogenic forcing. This is why Karl had to adjust the buoy temps towards the warm-biased ship inlet temps. Karl needed to create the pausebuster.
You don't know shit about this subject, do you?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Now, here's what Climate Change really looks like:
Arabia was once a lush paradise of grass and woodlands
Nowadays Arabia is a fierce desert, but it was once densely vegetated, and could have been a home to the first humans that left Africa.
When most of us think of Arabia, we think of rolling sand dunes, scorching sun, and precious little water. But in the quite recent past it was a place of rolling grasslands and shady woods, watered by torrential monsoon rains.
The finding could help settle how and when modern humans first left Africa, where our species evolved. If Arabia was once lush and fertile, it would have been an ideal place to migrate to.
"There were more windows of opportunity for humans to leave Africa than previously thought," says lead author Ash Parton of the University of Oxford in the UK.
Our hunter-gatherer ancestors "wouldn't have been able to exist in many areas of Arabia as it is today," says Parton. "At present the Indian Ocean Monsoon just clips the very southern edge of the peninsula," so the rest of Arabia is desert.
His team's findings suggest that the monsoon pushes further into Arabia every 23,000 years, allowing plants and animals to flourish. The findings are published in the journal Geology.
Modern humans evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago. Later on, some of them left Africa for Europe and Asia, and from there spread all around the world.
But it is not clear when they left Africa, or what route they took.
The most widely-accepted notion is that they left around 60,000 years ago, travelling along the coastline of Arabia into southern Asia. That would mean they were stuck in Africa for 140,000 years.
Other archaeologists think they left much earlier, perhaps as much as 130,000 years ago. "We have evidence that humans managed to expand out of Africa and into the Middle East between 130,000 and 90,000 years ago," says Parton. "But a lot of people have believed that this was a dead end, this was as far as they got, because of Arabia and the deserts."
Parton and his colleagues have now shown that Arabia went through several periods of heavy rainfall. This would have created savannahs and woodlands, making it much more habitable. That supports the idea of an earlier migration.
Parton studied dried-up riverbeds in south-east Arabia. Found in a quarry, the Al Sibetah site preserves the silt and sediments from the bottom of the rivers, going back 160,000 years.
They found evidence of five wet phases, during which the rivers flowed and silt was deposited. During the dry times, there was little water flow and less silt was laid down.
The first wet phase happened between 160,000 and 150,000 years ago, and the most recent was around 55,000 years ago. Each was an opportunity for people to move out of Africa towards Asia.
Previous studies had suggested that rainfall increased during these periods, but it was unclear how much. In a scorching desert, a little extra rainfall doesn't make much difference. The new study suggests that the increases were big enough to support rich ecosystems.
"The environmental record I've got fits perfectly with the archaeological record," says Parton. "There was a whole series of movements of humans into Arabia."
DAMN THOSE EARLY HUMANS - THEY MUST HAVE CAUSEDGLOBAL WARMING; er., CLIMATE CHANGE.
Arabia was once a lush paradise of grass and woodlands
Nowadays Arabia is a fierce desert, but it was once densely vegetated, and could have been a home to the first humans that left Africa.
When most of us think of Arabia, we think of rolling sand dunes, scorching sun, and precious little water. But in the quite recent past it was a place of rolling grasslands and shady woods, watered by torrential monsoon rains.
The finding could help settle how and when modern humans first left Africa, where our species evolved. If Arabia was once lush and fertile, it would have been an ideal place to migrate to.
"There were more windows of opportunity for humans to leave Africa than previously thought," says lead author Ash Parton of the University of Oxford in the UK.
Our hunter-gatherer ancestors "wouldn't have been able to exist in many areas of Arabia as it is today," says Parton. "At present the Indian Ocean Monsoon just clips the very southern edge of the peninsula," so the rest of Arabia is desert.
His team's findings suggest that the monsoon pushes further into Arabia every 23,000 years, allowing plants and animals to flourish. The findings are published in the journal Geology.
Modern humans evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago. Later on, some of them left Africa for Europe and Asia, and from there spread all around the world.
But it is not clear when they left Africa, or what route they took.
The most widely-accepted notion is that they left around 60,000 years ago, travelling along the coastline of Arabia into southern Asia. That would mean they were stuck in Africa for 140,000 years.
Other archaeologists think they left much earlier, perhaps as much as 130,000 years ago. "We have evidence that humans managed to expand out of Africa and into the Middle East between 130,000 and 90,000 years ago," says Parton. "But a lot of people have believed that this was a dead end, this was as far as they got, because of Arabia and the deserts."
Parton and his colleagues have now shown that Arabia went through several periods of heavy rainfall. This would have created savannahs and woodlands, making it much more habitable. That supports the idea of an earlier migration.
Parton studied dried-up riverbeds in south-east Arabia. Found in a quarry, the Al Sibetah site preserves the silt and sediments from the bottom of the rivers, going back 160,000 years.
They found evidence of five wet phases, during which the rivers flowed and silt was deposited. During the dry times, there was little water flow and less silt was laid down.
The first wet phase happened between 160,000 and 150,000 years ago, and the most recent was around 55,000 years ago. Each was an opportunity for people to move out of Africa towards Asia.
Previous studies had suggested that rainfall increased during these periods, but it was unclear how much. In a scorching desert, a little extra rainfall doesn't make much difference. The new study suggests that the increases were big enough to support rich ecosystems.
"The environmental record I've got fits perfectly with the archaeological record," says Parton. "There was a whole series of movements of humans into Arabia."
DAMN THOSE EARLY HUMANS - THEY MUST HAVE CAUSED
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
cancel2 2022
Canceled
It said that you left here before in disgrace for sexual harassment and asked why you've come back. Try deleting this sicko!!
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
No he doesn't, none of them do really. There are all such truly ignorant peasants. You have to ask yourself why NOAA always uses terrestrial based temperature sensors to declare the hottest year when satellites and radiosondes are far more accurate.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
lol
Just quoting one of your fellow douchebags, asshat.
You should read this article about another Dishonest Cunt, DC. A chronically debunked guy named Lindzen.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...n/06/climate-change-climate-change-scepticism
I read that article. So the rate of idiocy is 3 percent! There is room for Milagro.
• The 15-year 'pause' myth? Completely debunked – global surface warming over the past decade turns out to be more than double previous estimates, and the climate continues to accumulate heat at a rate equivalent to 4 Hiroshima atomic bomb detonations per second.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Man you are such a dishonest cunt. I knew as soon as I saw the Guardian name that it would another bullshit article by Dana Nuccitelli. The Guardian has very little credibility on climate matters and Nuccitelli has absolutely none. It shows how little you really know if you post an old article by that clown.
Richard Lindzen is an Emeritus professor of atmospheric physics at MIT, Nuccitelli is a dumb fucker with no qualifications in any of the physical sciences who, for all his blathering about Big Oil, actually works for Tetratech, a gas and oil company. Suffice to say that when the Guardian found that out, they dispensed with the scumbag's services. Now if you had any background you'd know that and wouldn't come here to get your arse kicked. So you richly deserve being called a dishonest cunt as well.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/22/dana-nuccitellis-vested-interest-oil-and-gas/
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited: