Rump won the election, but it's not irrelevant that HRC had more votes!
Rump is not, and likely never will be, the popularly elected president of the United States. Barack Obama was the two time popularly elected president of the United States.
Rump won the election, but it's not irrelevant that HRC had more votes!
What fascism has Trump engaged in?
Rump won the election, but it's not irrelevant that HRC had more votes!
Rump is not, and likely never will be, the popularly elected president of the United States. Barack Obama was the two time popularly elected president of the United States.
Bullshit. Stop lying Gomer.
Here it is, ignorant cuntwhistle.
Trump - 62,979,639
Clinton - 65,844,610
Other - 7,804,213
Do some simple math, stupid fucktard, and you'll see a difference of 10,669,187.
Checkmate, shitweasel.
Here it is, ignorant cuntwhistle.
Trump - 62,979,639
Clinton - 65,844,610
Other - 7,804,213
Do some simple math, stupid fucktard, and you'll see a difference of 10,669,187.
Checkmate, shitweasel.
The U.S. is a UNION of 50 "countries", Bigoted Ass. Each "country" deserves representation![]()
It is irrelevant since the overall popular vote means nothing. I would expect someone like you to know how the system works but it's apparent you don't. The popular votes in each State and D.C. having nothing to do with the popular votes in any of the other states. If you want to add them up for entertainment purposes or have something to whine about when you lose, that's your choice. When it comes to determining the winner, they are irrelevant as an overall count.
Suck it, loser, your bitch lost.
I see, I thought you were trying to say Clinton won by that many.
Clinton also lost those votes btw. Education, get one.
Actually, they rejected him by the tune of about 11,000,000 votes.
That's your typical MO. Miscomprehend, distort, twist, lie.
This is merely another validation of your chronic bullshittery.
What did I lie about? What did I distort?
Be specific.
And rejected Crooked Hillary by about 8,000,000 votes.
LePen loses!
The post, moron, was to correct the number of voters that rejected Trump. 3 million was incorrect. About 11 million was. It had nothing to do with Clinton.
You're a whiney little bitch today, aren't you? On your period, cunt?
"Macron's immediate challenge will be to secure a majority in next month's parliamentary election for En Marche! (Onwards!), his political movement that is barely a year old, in order to implement his program.
The 39-year-old former investment banker, who served for two years as economy minister but has never previously held elected office, will become France's youngest leader since Napoleon with a promise to transcend outdated left-right divisions."
Except for the age, sounds remarkably similar to Trump. Made real money, never held elected office and "with a promise to transcend outdated left-right divisions".
He more resembles Obama and eventually, Obama backed him.
Of course you know, le Pen was Trump's favorite.
Regardless, I'm glad that our efforts at State helped the French decide who was the best choice to lead their country. I spent all kinds of time during the last few visits there trying to assuage the fears of embassy workers and State department dependents.
It wasn't really necessary, IMO. The French, as well as much of Europe, has seen how Trump and his policies have taken down our nation and the effects of Brexit. We're seeing the end of the alt right movement.
He more resembles Obama and eventually, Obama backed him.
Of course you know, le Pen was Trump's favorite.
Regardless, I'm glad that our efforts at State helped the French decide who was the best choice to lead their country. I spent all kinds of time during the last few visits there trying to assuage the fears of embassy workers and State department dependents.
It wasn't really necessary, IMO. The French, as well as much of Europe, has seen how Trump and his policies have taken down our nation and the effects of Brexit. We're seeing the end of the alt right movement.