http://www.breitbart.com/big-journa...s-reports-95-7-percent-fall-quarterly-profit/
They are now laying people off as well..................LOL
They are now laying people off as well..................LOL
New York Times Reports 95.7 Percent Fall in Quarterly Profit...Poor liberal bufoons
- Thread starter TheDonald
- Start date
Guess their layoff plan is working 
Why the NYT Is Looking to Cut Costs, Even Though It Turned a Profit
Mathew Ingram
Feb 05, 2016
So the good news is that the New York Times turned a profit in its most recent quarter. Not a huge one, mind you, but in the current media environment simply being profitable is an achievement. The bad news? The paper's executive editor announced a new round of restructuring that could result in more layoffs.
But if the Times is profitable, why does it need to restructure? The short answer is that the paper squeaked its way into the black by cutting costs. Revenue isn't growing, despite its immensely successful digital paywall—which now has more than 1 million subscribers—and print advertising revenue continues to decline at a rapid pace.
The paper has also set itself the rather ambitious goal of doubling its digital revenue to more than $800 million in the next five years. If it continues to grow at the rate it did last year, that's going to take a miracle.
story continued at http://fortune.com/2016/02/05/nyt-profit/
Why the NYT Is Looking to Cut Costs, Even Though It Turned a Profit
Mathew Ingram
Feb 05, 2016
So the good news is that the New York Times turned a profit in its most recent quarter. Not a huge one, mind you, but in the current media environment simply being profitable is an achievement. The bad news? The paper's executive editor announced a new round of restructuring that could result in more layoffs.
But if the Times is profitable, why does it need to restructure? The short answer is that the paper squeaked its way into the black by cutting costs. Revenue isn't growing, despite its immensely successful digital paywall—which now has more than 1 million subscribers—and print advertising revenue continues to decline at a rapid pace.
The paper has also set itself the rather ambitious goal of doubling its digital revenue to more than $800 million in the next five years. If it continues to grow at the rate it did last year, that's going to take a miracle.
story continued at http://fortune.com/2016/02/05/nyt-profit/
LOL bro, they lost 96 percent of profits, so if they went up 25 percent then they are still down.
You do math..................bro?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I watch Fox all the time.
The Times is a great paper. No doubt that their op ed page is liberal, but their reporting and stories are exceptional.
Your loss.
So you believed that Hillary Clinton had a 98 percent chance of beating Trump...................LOL the loss is in your brain
Are you dumb enough to think the NYT (or any "liberal" paper) is losing profits because of trump?
He's your bro?
Are you dumb enough to think the NYT (or any "liberal" paper) is losing profits because of trump?
Dude the Times began losing major long before Trump....................They are nothing more than lies on paper, and now no one buys newspapers anyway
Cadillac Man
New member
When I went to your link I found this:
New York Times profit better than expected due to digital push
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-newyorktimes-results-idUSKBN12X1HU
After losing 96 percent of your profits anything is better than expected, as the Times IS EXPECTED TO SHUT DOWN OPERATIONS
cawacko
Well-known member
Are you dumb enough to think the NYT (or any "liberal" paper) is losing profits because of trump?
I think you're missing where he's going here. Jarod is claiming The NY Times has never been better financially than it is right now. Although it looks like the Times had an impressive first qtr they are nowhere near where they were in the past. Jarod is talking out of his *ss and this is a response.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
I cut the cord long ago. I get my news from Drudge then work out from there. Oh, and my local paper, the Winston-Salem Urinal.
Better, by definition, means an improvement over a previous situation. It's used to compare two or more things. Like you said, after losing 96%, most anything would be BETTER.
GazzaQueen
Verified User
If profits were down 96% and they rose 50%, that means they're only down 46%.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
No. Start with $100, lose 96% and you end up with $4. Start with $4, gain 50% and you end up with $6.
That's 94% in by my math.
Wrong kid, you are confusing profits with stock value. These are two completely different things.
LOL try again
Their entire paper, apart from sports, ads, and world news is pretty much editorialized with a liberal bent with few exceptions.