Who is willing to defend United Airlines?

USFREEDOM911 said:
Why are you trying to take an incident on an airline flight and correlate with other incidents that have nothing to do with airlines?

Are you unable to begin a thread, where you can discuss your agenda and intent?
Click to expand...
You obviously haven't seen the video. The 'incident' involves cops with roid rage. That's common across the country.
 
Yaya said:
That you actually think white people are not killed by cops for failure to comply boggles my mind.

https://www.google.com/#q=white+people+killed+by+police+2016

More whites are killed by police than black people.
Click to expand...
You should probably read your own links!

And, when considering shootings confined within a single race, a black person shot and killed by police is more likely to have been unarmed than a white person. About 13 percent of all black people who have been fatally shot by police since January 2015 were unarmed, compared with 7 percent of all white people.
 
Althea said:
You should probably read your own links!

And, when considering shootings confined within a single race, a black person shot and killed by police is more likely to have been unarmed than a white person. About 13 percent of all black people who have been fatally shot by police since January 2015 were unarmed, compared with 7 percent of all white people.
Click to expand...

I did read that. Doesn't change the fact you think NO white people have been killed.

You didn't ask about percentage in terms of ethnicity, you flat out asked (meaning you believe no white people have been killed by police) if any white people have been killed.

You are wrong, just admit it.
 
Althea said:
Being killed by police, and being killed by police when you are defenseless, and just 'scaring' them, are two different issues. You should spend more time reading the comments you reply to.
Click to expand...

Your post

Althea said:
Can you cite any incidents of white people being murdered by white cops because 'they didn't comply'?

Oh, wait....whites always comply...eh?
Click to expand...

No where did you mention "defenseless, and just 'scaring' them".

But I see you're now majorly back peddling from your question because you realize how stupid it was.
 
Yaya said:
I did read that. Doesn't change the fact you think NO white people have been killed.

You didn't ask about percentage in terms of ethnicity, you flat out asked (meaning you believe no white people have been killed by police) if any white people have been killed.

You are wrong, just admit it.
Click to expand...
If you were any smarter, you'd be embarrassed by your stupidity.
 
Althea said:
You should probably read your own links!

And, when considering shootings confined within a single race, a black person shot and killed by police is more likely to have been unarmed than a white person. About 13 percent of all black people who have been fatally shot by police since January 2015 were unarmed, compared with 7 percent of all white people.
Click to expand...

What do your stats say about the people who were shot, holding or pointing something that made it appear they were armed?
 
Yaya said:
So your IQ is 95. Interesting. You're not stupid because we have different views, you are stupid because of your logic. In this thread, we are actually in agreement on almost everything, so don't pretend it is just because we have different views.

For someone who claims they are so intelligent, I have yet to see anything highly intelligent from you. Right claimed the other day that you said you have two degrees, was he lying? I have never seen anyone have such an incessant need to convince others of their intelligence.
Click to expand...

You are not capable of judging my intelligence yurt.
 
Milagro said:
Here is the viewpoint of a pilot's wife, well worth reading to get another side to that incident aboard flight 3411.

https://thepilotwifelife.wordpress....thoughts-from-a-pilot-wife-about-flight-3411/

Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

I saw this earlier today and she's trying to equate removing her kids socks, that supposedly looked like shoes, with someone receiving a concussion, having their nose broke, and having two teeth knocked out.

I ain't buying it, any more then I would buy a ticket on United.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I saw this earlier today and she's trying to equate removing her kids socks, that supposedly looked like shoes, with someone receiving a concussion, having their nose broke, and having two teeth knocked out.

I ain't buying it, any more then I would buy a ticket on United.
Click to expand...
Actually you surprise me as normally you are very against people standing up to authority. This guy had been escorted out of a secure area and he ran back in again, it was the Feds that removed him not United.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Althea said:
over booking is a necessary evil in the industry, and I don't think that will change. But, they might change the parameters for determining a passenger's rights. We might see legislation re. this particular instance, especially when it boils down to internal employee issues.

They created new laws after that plane full of passengers sat on a tarmac for two hours a few years ago.
Click to expand...

Ahhh yes new laws. That fixes EVERYTHING.
 
Milagro said:
Actually you surprise me as normally you are very against people standing up to authority. This guy had been escorted out of a secure area and he ran back in again, it was the Feds that removed him not United.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
Click to expand...

So now we want to focus on what he did after he received the concussion, had his nose broke, and two teeth knocked out.
Who knows what he was thinking, since he already had a concussion.

United becomes responsible anytime they ask anyone to act as their agent.

The Dr. committed no act, that would warrant him being told to leave; other then United being so full of themselves that they didn't know what to do when someone tells them NO.

United was wrong to treat this man this way.
If they wanted to fly 4 of their people, then they shouldn't have let the last 4 people board or made other arrangements.

This can be seen, due to the changes they've already decided to make; so this doesn't happen again.

The "authorities" were not right, in this particular incident.
 
Everyone hates the airlines these days because they want first class service at Priceline prices.

More gobblement regulations is what we need. I am surprised Paul Ryan hasn't pushed something through already
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So now we want to focus on what he did after he received the concussion, had his nose broke, and two teeth knocked out.
Who knows what he was thinking, since he already had a concussion.

United becomes responsible anytime they ask anyone to act as their agent.

The Dr. committed no act, that would warrant him being told to leave; other then United being so full of themselves that they didn't know what to do when someone tells them NO.

United was wrong to treat this man this way.
If they wanted to fly 4 of their people, then they shouldn't have let the last 4 people board or made other arrangements.

This can be seen, due to the changes they've already decided to make; so this doesn't happen again.

The "authorities" were not right, in this particular incident.
Click to expand...

He did that before he was forcibly removed, not after, which is why the Feds became involved.

If a federal law enforcement officer asks me to exit a plane, no matter how royally pissed off I am, I’m going to do it and then seek other means of legal reimbursement. True story. From the article.

"Knowing what I know about airport security, I’m certainly not going to run back into a secured, federally restricted area at an airport flailing my arms and screaming like a banshee…because, you know, that just happens to be breaking a major federal Homeland Security law."



Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top