The CIA and Deep State can fake where "hacks" orginiate from

BRUTALITOPS

on indefiniate mod break
Contributor
MWcYZfw.jpg
 
It's entirely possible the CIA hacked the DNC and made it look like 'the Russians' -
same with Podesta
 
This certainly makes any electronic evidence questionable. Even more reason why Trump needs to call the heads of these agencies in his office, announce "your fired", then call in, the second in command, ask questions and if not forthcoming, fire them, and so on until all the rats have been flushed out.
 
We certainly need more transparency. But Trump and grind don't support that. Instead they want to squash would be Snowden's that might expose Trump's attempts to mislead the people. It's not going to work.

This must be why Trump/Grind want Snowden to face execution.

Meanwhile, Trump demands more surveillance of the people, more civil asset forfeiture, more citizens in jail cells and far less liberty.

Grind does not give a shit about individual rights anymore as he had to abandon that in order to adopt identity politics.

https://www.isidewith.com/candidate-guide/donald-trump/domestic-policy

Should the NSA (National Security Agency) be allowed to collect basic metadata of citizen’s phone calls such as numbers, timestamps, and call durations?
Donald Trump’s answer: Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

Do you support the Patriot Act?
Donald Trump’s answer: Yes

Should the U.S. government grant immunity to Edward Snowden?
Donald Trump’s answer: No, he should be returned to the U.S. to stand trial and face the consequences of his actions
 
It's entirely possible the CIA hacked the DNC and made it look like 'the Russians' -
same with Podesta

The CIA is a very likely suspect.

But I've always been suspect about the degree of certainty some partisans have held with respect to the Russians. Any competent hacker is only going to leave the tracks they want to leave. That said, that leaves the possibility the Russians [or someone in Russia] didn't care about leaving tracks.

No matter how you slice it, the evidence is weak.
 
This certainly makes any electronic evidence questionable. Even more reason why Trump needs to call the heads of these agencies in his office, announce "your fired", then call in, the second in command, ask questions and if not forthcoming, fire them, and so on until all the rats have been flushed out.

They should be properly vetted~vet the hell out of them to be sure they aint lyin to our leader...

They don't do anything anyways, vet them down till the janitors are running the show....:whoa:
 
They should be properly vetted~vet the hell out of them to be sure they aint lyin to our leader...

They don't do anything anyways, vet them down the the janitors running the show....:whoa:

Nice that we agree here.
 
The CIA is a very likely suspect.

But I've always been suspect about the degree of certainty some partisans have held with respect to the Russians. Any competent hacker is only going to leave the tracks they want to leave. That said, that leaves the possibility the Russians [or someone in Russia] didn't care about leaving tracks.

No matter how you slice it, the evidence is weak.
Ya. I can't imagine "Russian hackers" would leave fingerprints pointing to themselves -especially since it's supposed to be "state actors"-actual Russian government
 
We certainly need more transparency. But Trump and grind don't support that. Instead they want to squash would be Snowden's that might expose Trump's attempts to mislead the people. It's not going to work.

This must be why Trump/Grind want Snowden to face execution.

Meanwhile, Trump demands more surveillance of the people, more civil asset forfeiture, more citizens in jail cells and far less liberty.

Grind does not give a shit about individual rights anymore as he had to abandon that in order to adopt identity politics.

https://www.isidewith.com/candidate-guide/donald-trump/domestic-policy

Should the NSA (National Security Agency) be allowed to collect basic metadata of citizen’s phone calls such as numbers, timestamps, and call durations?
Donald Trump’s answer: Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

Do you support the Patriot Act?
Donald Trump’s answer: Yes

Should the U.S. government grant immunity to Edward Snowden?
Donald Trump’s answer: No, he should be returned to the U.S. to stand trial and face the consequences of his actions

How did Obama feel about Snowden??

obam-signs_ndaa.jpg
 
Last edited:
This certainly makes any electronic evidence questionable. Even more reason why Trump needs to call the heads of these agencies in his office, announce "your fired", then call in, the second in command, ask questions and if not forthcoming, fire them, and so on until all the rats have been flushed out.
'Drain the swamp'.
 
We certainly need more transparency. But Trump and grind don't support that. Instead they want to squash would be Snowden's that might expose Trump's attempts to mislead the people. It's not going to work.

This must be why Trump/Grind want Snowden to face execution.

The error is in how Snowden released information.

Snowden released dangerous intelligence information to a foreign agency and that is treason.

He could have released it to the New York Times, any number of liberal news outlets.

Working with the government, they could have avoided endangering lives by releasing information more carefully.

This is why that as a veteran, I am more than willing to provide the rope or bullet to put Snowden into the ground.
 
So then you don't believe it was the Russians?

I am sorry.
I don't believe I either said or implied that.
You are truly a concrete thinker.
All or nothing
Black or white
No shades of grey.
This is why you are so boring ; no nuance whatsoever.
 
I am sorry.
I don't believe I either said or implied that.
You are truly a concrete thinker.
All or nothing
Black or white
No shades of grey.
This is why you are so boring ; no nuance whatsoever.

I asked a question you retard. Based on the fact you agree the CIA could fake that it was the Russians, it was a completely logical question to ask.

You're not intelligent on any scale.
 
I asked a question you retard. Based on the fact you agree the CIA could fake that it was the Russians, it was a completely logical question to ask.

You're not intelligent on any scale.

You are hardly one to judge, foolish child.
 
You are hardly one to judge, foolish child.

I'm not the one ranting and raving someone asked me a logical question based on a statement I made. You claim to be highly intelligent, I have never once seen any example of this. This exchange just further proves it.

You make a comment that - "Thank you Capt. Obvious. Anything else you just figured out?" - the CIA can fake it was from the Russians. I merely ask is that what you believe happened.

And you go off on a freaking insane rant, when all you had to do was say, no. Asking a question obviously means I am unsure if you implied that, hence seeking clarification. Pretty basic stuff here Rune, patently basic.
 
I'm not the one ranting and raving someone asked me a logical question based on a statement I made. You claim to be highly intelligent, I have never once seen any example of this. This exchange just further proves it.

You make a comment that - "Thank you Capt. Obvious. Anything else you just figured out?" - the CIA can fake it was from the Russians. I merely ask is that what you believe happened.

And you go off on a freaking insane rant, when all you had to do was say, no. Asking a question obviously means I am unsure if you implied that, hence seeking clarification. Pretty basic stuff here Rune, patently basic.

An insane rant?
Exaggerate much?

The words I used contained my meaning.
An intelligent person would know that.
A foolish child; not so much.
 
Back
Top