If Evolution is true, how did DNA code itself

Darth Omar said:
Where did you get all that from? I even cited Darwin.

Should I not have read him lol?

The crap is labeling anyone who is skeptical a 'creationist'. You guys do the same thing with global warming skeptics by labeling them deniers.
Click to expand...

Darwin is an old fool who by no fault of his own never saw or even dreamed of DNA. Nothing he said holds water any longer, he should be read so we can know how dumb science is
 
Mott the Hoople said:
ah...you should have fun here then. Like shooting fish in a barrel. I'm a mere master of science but I work in garbage. Which means I'm quite at home here. :)
Click to expand...

I have no credentials in science at all. Except college chemistry. My point is that I know tons of them. They would consider it disqualifying.
 
Micawber said:
I have no credentials in science at all. Except college chemistry. My point is that I know tons of them. They would consider it disqualifying.
Click to expand...

I do too. That's why I joined in opposing creationist on the State BOE when they tried to eliminate evolution from our science standards. Uninformed lay people have no business telling professionals in a field they are not educated in what the standards of their profession ought to be.
 
Micawber said:
Google is a robust database. Now try that experiment controlling for morons. Put it in a database of papers published in peer reviewed scientific scholarly journals.
Click to expand...

The fact that 99 percent of college professors some with mathematical credentials provided peer reviewed papers that Donald Trump had no mathematical path to becoming president is as comical as your assentation that if these same morons do not agree that intelligent design is valid has as much meaning as President Hillary Clinton who they ALL voted for.

Simplified, you and they are and were all wrong.

Case proved

Next
 
Dick from the Internet said:
You are not a scientific skeptic. Your doubts are all based on your faith and apparent ignorance or it is just propaganda to push a political/religious agenda.

You should read some explanation of the theory of evolution that does not come from a creationist source.
Click to expand...

I've heard that so many times I took pains to *slog* through Darwins book lol. And yes, it was a painful read.

I used to be less skeptical of it. In fact, I wasn't skeptical at all when I was younger. Then I want full blown YEC till I became skeptical of it.

Now my mind is open on the whole issue. Let the evidence lead where it may.
 
Darth Omar said:
I've heard that so many times I took pains to *slog* through Darwins book lol. And yes, it was a painful read.

I used to be less skeptical of it. In fact, I wasn't skeptical at all when I was younger. Then I want full blown YEC till I became skeptical of it.

Now my mind is open on the whole issue. Let the evidence lead where it may.
Click to expand...

Don't be too hard on Darwin, remember he had no DNA or Electron Microscope, in fact all he had was a pen and little book. The more we learn, the less we like what we find as we are clearly robots of a sort that only follow programming
 
TheDonald said:
Don't be too hard on Darwin, remember he had no DNA or Electron Microscope, in fact all he had was a pen and little book. The more we learn, the less we like what we find as we are clearly robots of a sort that only follow programming
Click to expand...

I'm not hard on Darwin at all. Just the opposite, in fact.

Darwin was a meticulous observer and his conclusions weren't unsound based on what he observed. It's easy to see why his theory took off.
 
TheDonald said:
Understood, but there is no evidence that one species can become another via evolution, and if that happened the first beetle would disappear leaving the same number of specie.
Click to expand...

If two different "whatevers" of beetle cannot reproduce they are different species.....
 
Mott the Hoople said:
What a load of crap. You and others try to interject supernatural causation and cry foul when scientists point out that isn't science. The truth is a scientific explanation that provide a better and useful model than an existing one is always accepted.

The criticism of your argument is that you present a fallacious understanding of evolutionary theory tied to a religious agenda using religious philosophies like intelligent design creationism that are not testable science.
Click to expand...

Show me the science behind the belief that man evolved from algae....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Show me the science behind the belief that man evolved from algae....
Click to expand...

Go to any natural history museum not sponsored by a Us Protestant fundamentalist sect. Then read everything on every exhibit. Nobody has the time to make up for the fucked up education you received k1-12 on a message board post.

All life evolved from a single seminal form. Not algae though.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I do too. That's why I joined in opposing creationist on the State BOE when they tried to eliminate evolution from our science standards. Uninformed lay people have no business telling professionals in a field they are not educated in what the standards of their profession ought to be.
Click to expand...

Thank you for your service. 😎
 
TheDonald said:
The fact that 99 percent of college professors some with mathematical credentials provided peer reviewed papers that Donald Trump had no mathematical path to becoming president is as comical as your assentation that if these same morons do not agree that intelligent design is valid has as much meaning as President Hillary Clinton who they ALL voted for.

Simplified, you and they are and were all wrong.

Case proved

Next
Click to expand...

Inapt
 
Darth Omar said:
I'm not hard on Darwin at all. Just the opposite, in fact.

Darwin was a meticulous observer and his conclusions weren't unsound based on what he observed. It's easy to see why his theory took off.
Click to expand...

Darwin discovered evolution of species, he did not discover genesis of species. It's really that simple
 
Micawber said:
Go to any natural history museum not sponsored by a Us Protestant fundamentalist sect. Then read everything on every exhibit. Nobody has the time to make up for the fucked up education you received k1-12 on a message board post.

All life evolved from a single seminal form. Not algae though.
Click to expand...

obviously I am more familiar with the exhibits of the evolutionist's "history" than you........algae is on the path that the evolutionists proclaim.......I'm sorry you don't have the balls to defend your strawman.....no liberal does......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top