Not going to the Supreme Court, Rump gives up

If the new EO mentions religion at all it will be shot down by the courts before it can be implemented on day one.
I doubt anything intelligible will come out of his white house of chaos...
Has anyone noticed that the president is going insane?
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
The first EO did not mention religion.

Why do lefties lie as much as Trump and then whine about his lying?
Click to expand...

Hmmmm. So you do admit he lies. If he was ever hooked up to a lie detector he would knock out all electric generators on the eastern seaboard. Guaranteed!
 
Jarod said:
The White House announced today that they will no longer defend the travel ban but will be issuing a new one next week.
Click to expand...

What he needs to do is get Bibi to send some interrogators over here and start the extremen vetting now. We'll ban the bastards that way.

But I suppose Trump is setting up the 9th Circuit here. Show them to be the activists that we all know that they are, s Congress will have evidence to impeach the bastards.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
If they make it super black and white again that this is a ban based on a religious test then that too will fail constitutional scrutiny. For a EO to be legal it has to have a sound legal precedent to be enforced. Otherwise, as in this case, the courts will throw it out. This means that the Executive branch will have to elaborate a specific national security interest for said EO to be legal.

Is that possible? I'm certain it is but it can't be done on an unconstitutional religious test.
Click to expand...
45 claimed the new EO would be about super vetting.
 
I predict that no matter how the new EO comes out it will be challenged as unconstitutional on the grounds that the legislative intent is to ban muslims. In which case you will have to go to the supreme court anyway.
 
Yaya said:
The first EO did not mention religion.

Why do lefties lie as much as Trump and then whine about his lying?
Click to expand...
No, not in so many words, but as you know judges in these matters look at intent, Trumps words during the campaign showed the intent.
 
Queen Snowflake said:
No, not in so many words, but as you know judges in these matters look at intent, Trumpsxwords duringk the campaign showed the intent.
Click to expand...

so the eo was perfectly fine in form and any eo he makes will still face the same hurdle. The challenge lies in the ability of judges to get intent outside of the four corners of the law hence it should go to the SC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top