Trump's big Mulsim ban

Thing1 said:
What PDB was that?

And isn't it worse to allow a massive terror attack under your watch, like Bush did?
Click to expand...

Are you now gonna claim Willy didn't know about OBL....? lmao

You're always good for a giggle, gotta give you that....

That attack was already in progress before Bush was elected....

You just might agree with your comrade BAC and say Bush is behind the WTC ..... ya know, those buildings falling straight down and all.....

now that you're half nuts you could just bonkers all the way.......
 
"Trump's temporary ban on refugees from seven Muslim-majority countries has quickly taken hold. Cairo airport officials say seven U.S.-bound migrants — six from Iraq and one from Yemen — were stopped Saturday from boarding an EgyptAir flight to New York’s JFK airport. In a separate incident, two Iraqi refugees arrived in the U.S. but were detained at John F. Kennedy International Airport following President Trump's temporary ban on refugees from seven Muslim-majority countries."

USA Today



Just an aside.........ever notice how most all of the refugees are young healthy males? What? They leave the women and children back home living in danger in the war zones?
In past generations it was the opposite. From countries all over the world, it would be the able-bodied men to would get the women, children and elderly family members out of harms way first, sending them to safety either here or another country. Then, the men would follow later after fighting their wars. Not much chivalry in these Muslim countries.
 
NOVA said:
Are you now gonna claim Willy didn't know about OBL....? lmao

You're always good for a giggle, gotta give you that....

That attack was already in progress before Bush was elected....

You just might agree with your comrade BAC and say Bush is behind the WTC ..... ya know, those buildings falling straight down and all.....

now that you're half nuts you could just bonkers all the way.......
Click to expand...

Can't link a PDB, eh?

The bolded is one of the most hilarious things I've seen from you. The attack of 9/11 was "in progress" when Bush took office.

I'm not sure apologism gets more extreme than that. You are really a clown.
 
Thing1 said:
Can't link a PDB, eh?

The bolded is one of the most hilarious things I've seen from you. The attack of 9/11 was "in progress" when Bush took office.

I'm not sure apologism gets more extreme than that. You are really a clown.
Click to expand...

Now you imaging the hijackers were only here for sight seeing and conjured up the attack after Bush took office ?

Yes, the attack was under way when then entered the country....thats an undeniable fact of life.....
 
NOVA said:
Now you imaging the hijackers were only here for sight seeing and conjured up the attack after Bush took office ?

Yes, the attack was under way when then entered the country....thats an undeniable fact of life.....
Click to expand...

Do you even know what an attack is?

What an embarrassment. There really is nothing you won't apologize for.
 
Thing1 said:
Do you even know what an attack is?

What an embarrassment. There really is nothing you won't apologize for.
Click to expand...

I guess you would claim that the WWII D-day attack wasn't underway until the troops actually landed in France and started shooting

or an Obama drone attack wasn't under way until the drone missiles actually exploded on the ground.....

....those examples would conform with your convoluted logic.....
 
NOVA said:
I guess you would claim that the WWII D-day attack wasn't underway until the troops actually landed in France and started shooting

or an Obama drone attack wasn't under way until the drone missiles actually exploded on the ground.....

....those examples would conform with your convoluted logic.....
Click to expand...

It's now "convoluted logic" to differentiate between planning for an attack, and actually attacking.

Bush got a PDB warning him that OBL was determined to attack the U.S. He ignored it. ON HIS WATCH.

Stop trying to cover for that guy. It is extremely embarrassing. And now you're going to do the same for Trump, every day.
 
Thing1 said:
It's now "convoluted logic" to differentiate between planning for an attack, and actually attacking.

Bush got a PDB warning him that OBL was determined to attack the U.S. He ignored it. ON HIS WATCH.

Stop trying to cover for that guy. It is extremely embarrassing. And now you're going to do the same for Trump, every day.
Click to expand...

Yeah....when those ships set sail on Dday it was no attack, it was just 'planning'......

when Obama's drones took off it wasn't an attack, it was just the planning stage .....

and when those hijackers entered the country it wasn't an attack, it was just planning for the attack.....

You're making an ass of yourself.....
 
NOVA said:
Yeah....when those ships set sail on Dday it was no attack, it was just 'planning'......

when Obama's drones took off it wasn't an attack, it was just the planning stage .....

and when those hijackers entered the country it wasn't an attack, it was just planning for the attack.....

You're making an ass of yourself.....
Click to expand...

I'm just literally laughing, out loud. The bolded are NOTHING like "hijackers entering the country."

You are so far gone. What a hack lunatic you are. Oh - and your 1st post on this thread is still ignorant & stupid.
 
christiefan915 said:
Once your messiah bush launched a pre-emptive strike on a sovereign nation, terrorism took a YUGE leap.
Click to expand...

Yep...Bush did it, its not like there was any UN sanctions....or the fact many two faced democrats authorized the use of military force under the Wars Powers Act of 1973. Clinton voted Yes...Biden voted Yes....Dodd voted yes....Feinstein voted Yes......Kerry voted Yes.....Dirty Harry voted Yes......Chucky the Schumer voted Yes.....

Now you are going to tell us that the (wink, wink) intelligence was faulty....the CIA lied? Laugh My Ass Off

When it suits an argument the CIA is very reliable....this election. But...to deflect from their support of the War on Terror...the CIA is not reliable whatsoever. :whoa:

But, lets talk about Soetoro and Clinton engaging in warfare in up to 6 nations at once. Unilaterally void of any congressional oversight. Where is the vote under the war powers act for the US to be engaged in nations like Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, or to support the construction of ISIS by providing them with US weapons under the pretense they are Freedom fighters? Attacking sovereign nations by drone and killing its citizens is an act of war....but what's more egregious is the fact that Soetoro has authorized the killing of US CITIZENS void of any due process simply because they were 'under suspicion'.

Do you suppose the 4 murders in Benghazi were just a quinky ding? That was a cover up to eliminate the real purpose of being in that nation when all the other member nations had long since withdrawn because it was unsafe...the US EMBASSY was nothing but a front for selling weapons to the Muslims, arming them...they thought to take out the heads of states in certain nations. Now...here stands Isis, armed with American Weapons still fighting and planning more terrorist attacks around the globe.

Racist and Bigoted Liberals arm the Muslim Brotherhood....but attempt to disarm US Citizens?
 
Last edited:
I watched an interview with Peter Bergen, the author of a book on domestic terrorism. He indicated refugees are not the problem. His words on Trump's ban? "Red herring."
 
I remember standing on empty aluminum cans then touching the side with my other foot... Suddenly it collapsed straight down. But wait, physics can't be explained on small examples like that... Well, yes it can. The same thing that makes the empty aluminum can stable enough to hold your weight held that building stable. When the weight bearing wall was damaged it no longer could support the weight of the floors above it, collapsing just as the can used to when I was a child... Directly down because that is where the weight was pressing.

The "we did 9/11" theme is stupid, it defies logic and physics.
 
domer76 said:
I watched an interview with Peter Bergen, the author of a book on domestic terrorism. He indicated refugees are not the problem. His words on Trump's ban? "Red herring."
Click to expand...

Sure, sure.....they have been no attacks on US soil by any refugees. Tell the parents, brothers, sisters and children of the US CITIZENS killed or maimed by refugees that their family member is dead or injured because of the RED HERRING. The reality? Under Soetoro alone.....and his lack of vetting and investigating or the failure to even call the murderers by their correct title, Radical Islamic Terrorists....

Facts: In 2009 there was 11 documented terrorist attacks on US soil In 2010 there was 17 attacks In 2011 there was 9 attacks. In 2012 there was 13 Attacks. In 2013 there was 16 attacks. In 2014 there was 19 Attacks. In 2015 there was 7 attacks. In 2016 there was 15 Attacks.....all the above were on US soil.

A Red HERRING? Really? And its a good idea to admit 150 thousand more Muslims every year from the very nations that train them from birth to hate the west...with no practical method of vetting any of them, especially those from war torn regions that have no records whatsoever available.
 
+ said:
in case anyone wants to debate BAC's critical thinking skills in the future...
Click to expand...

What else can be said but Cognitive Dissonance is a powerful mindfuck. Some people won't let a silliy little thing like the truth get in the way of their beliefs.
 
Ralph said:
Sure, sure.....they have been no attacks on US soil by any refugees. Tell the parents, brothers, sisters and children of the US CITIZENS killed or maimed by refugees that their family member is dead or injured because of the RED HERRING. The reality? Under Soetoro alone.....and his lack of vetting and investigating or the failure to even call the murderers by their correct title, Radical Islamic Terrorists....

Facts: In 2009 there was 11 documented terrorist attacks on US soil In 2010 there was 17 attacks In 2011 there was 9 attacks. In 2012 there was 13 Attacks. In 2013 there was 16 attacks. In 2014 there was 19 Attacks. In 2015 there was 7 attacks. In 2016 there was 15 Attacks.....all the above were on US soil.

A Red HERRING? Really? And its a good idea to admit 150 thousand more Muslims every year from the very nations that train them from birth to hate the west...with no practical method of vetting any of them, especially those from war torn regions that have no records whatsoever available.
Click to expand...

How many were refugees, douchebag?
 
When we enthusiastically sacrifice principles and values that make America what it is under the guise of "protecting America," the terrorists win.

You can take it to any extreme. We might not even recognize the country that we end up with if we keep at it. But Trump will claim we're "safer," so it'll all be okay.
 
Obama banned Iraqi refugees in 2011.

Of course, the State Media "jounrnalist's" liplock on Obama's anus kept them silent.

The media meltdown, now that Obama is gone, ... is intense! The poutrage is incredible.
:rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top