Donald Trump Signs Anti-Abortion Executive Order Surrounded By Men

58863f342900002800dd1374.jpeg


Look at those self righteous pigs standing there all happy and satisfied with themselves.

I wonder how of them have paid for abortions for former girlfriends, mistresses and daughters.

Two-faced assholes.

If you think they have, provide proof of it.
 
Silly argument. The boil's DNA belongs to the same person. The baby has it's own unique and individual DNA. It's a different person altogether.

Unique DNA is not the test. Your conviction that life begins at conception is religious in origin, not scientific. The test is the amorphous concept of legal personhood. It has unique DNA, but it is not a person.

Ps, if I am cloned, can I kill my clone since it does not have unique DNA? What's your scientific basis for a proscription on my doing that?
 
Unique DNA is not the test. Your conviction that life begins at conception is religious in origin, not scientific. The test is the amorphous concept of legal personhood. It has unique DNA, but it is not a person.

Ps, if I am cloned, can I kill my clone since it does not have unique DNA? What's your scientific basis for a proscription on my doing that?

Can your clone murder someone and you be prosecuted for it? Your arguments are nonsense.

Science says what makes us humans (persons) is our human DNA. Nothing else has it except human beings.

Perhaps you think of them as human organ harvesting pods?
 
If you think they have, provide proof of it.

His point was made. These are society men. It would not do for their daughters to have shameful offspring due to their backward, conventional societal norms. Every damn one would have the problem discreetly handled with zero personal involvement.
 
Unique DNA is not the test. Your conviction that life begins at conception is religious in origin, not scientific. The test is the amorphous concept of legal personhood. It has unique DNA, but it is not a person.

Ps, if I am cloned, can I kill my clone since it does not have unique DNA? What's your scientific basis for a proscription on my doing that?

Care to back that up as definitive, wholly accepted proof?
 
Can your clone murder someone and you be prosecuted for it? Your arguments are nonsense.

Science says what makes us humans (persons) is our human DNA. Nothing else has it except human beings.

Perhaps you think of them as human organ harvesting pods?

Fuck you are stupid. If my clone is offed is it murder? Focus. Your test you just used was "unique DNA" a clone does not possess unique DNA.

Or dodge the question. By the way, religious man, aren't you.

Boom
 
His point was made. These are society men. It would not do for their daughters to have shameful offspring due to their backward, conventional societal norms. Every damn one would have the problem discreetly handled with zero personal involvement.

You call that proof that they have done what Nomad said they've done for their daughters, mistresses, etc.?
 
Silly argument. The boil's DNA belongs to the same person. The baby has it's own unique and individual DNA. It's a different person altogether.
How is it silly? PMP was claiming that the presence of human DNA was enough to define life. In which case the pus from a boil is also a living entity if you follow that logic!!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
His point was made. These are society men. It would not do for their daughters to have shameful offspring due to their backward, conventional societal norms. Every damn one would have the problem discreetly handled with zero personal involvement.

How do you suggest they handle it...in a back alley or at a planned parenthood body part distribution point? There is not one moral Physician who would preform ABORTION on a healthy female and a healthy child in the womb...as that would make their Physicians HIPPOCRATIC OATH.....that being FIRST DO NO HARM....a joke.

Any physician that works in an abortion mill is morally guilty of nothing less than murder.
 
Fuck you are stupid. If my clone is offed is it murder? Focus. Your test you just used was "unique DNA" a clone does not possess unique DNA.

Or dodge the question. By the way, religious man, aren't you.

Boom

Your clone does not have unique and individual human DNA. The baby does. Capiche?
 
Originally Posted by blackascoal View Post
Because they aren't killing them, their ending a life before it's ever born.
**************************************************

Right...........Abortion kills a life. Period.

What Trump signed was to not fund the rest of the world's murderers.
 
... OR 100 at-risk children in hopeless situations so he could tell them to their faces that he isn't going to do shit for them because he only cares about dead children.

Where is your expectation of responsibility for the women that choose to have those babies?
 
well, if you had read the entire discussion it was about waiting eight years.......no I am not adopted, but both of my children are

One of my daughters adopted 4 siblings.

She had adopted 2, originally; but then two more came along and she wanted them to be together as a family, so she adopted them also.

They're now ages 8, 5, 3, and 2.
 
Care to back that up as definitive, wholly accepted proof?

Who are you and why are you following me around like a dog in heat?

Life is obviously continuous, scientifically, going back to single called life millions of years ago, unendingly. The idea that life begins at conception predates the enlightenment, and prior to that time every concept owed its validity to religious auspices.
Coincidentally, men treated women like cattle or worse. The trump gathering of priests photo in this thread is a great reminder.
 
So what? That's a truly piss poor, or should I say puss poor, argument. DNA was first discovered in 1869 by Frederick Miescher whilst studying leukocytes from pus-ridden bandages. So are you saying that popping a boil is murder as well?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

Will the boil every become a living entity?
 
Who are you and why are you following me around like a dog in heat?

Life is obviously continuous, scientifically, going back to single called life millions of years ago, unendingly. The idea that life begins at conception predates the enlightenment, and prior to that time every concept owed its validity to religious auspices.
Coincidentally, men treated women like cattle or worse. The trump gathering of priests photo in this thread is a great reminder.

Who is following you around? I can see by your blustering though you cannot back up the bullshit you are posting.
 
Because they aren't killing them, their ending a life before it's ever born. A life THEY are responsible for, not you.

Republicans are only pro-UNBORN-life. Once born, they couldn't care less about that life.

Yet you call it a LIFE.

If the woman chooses to have the child, why does the responsibility for it go away when she refuses to support it financially?
 
Back
Top