Trump @ CNN "you are fake news"

christiefan915 said:
And trump himself still talked about it until September 2016.
Click to expand...

Surely you must be as amazed as I am about how blind and lemming-like Trump supporters are.

Sure, I knew they were idiots, but DAMN, their blindness has no bounds. They'd sacrifice the security of this nation for blind ideology.

'Patriots' my ass.

Frankly, I'm glad the covers are off. Nowhere to hide and no one to blame for their evil.
 
Ok, first of all, these meetings, as you know, are confidential, classified. So I'm not allowed to talk about what went on in a meeting. But we had many witnesses in that meeting. Many of them with us. And I will say again, I think it's a disgrace that information would be let out. I saw the information. I read the information outside of that meeting. It’s all fake news. It’s phony stuff. It did not happen. And it was gotten by opponents of ours, as you know because you reported it and so did many of the other people. It was a group of opponents they got together -- sick people -- and they put that crap together.
Click to expand...
i can't figure out who was leaking...there had to be leaking or Buzzfeed wouldn't just suddenly publish it.

As far as hacking, I think it was Russia. But I think we also get hacked by other countries and other people. And I can say that, you know, when we lost twenty-two million names and everything else that was hacked recently, they didn’t make a big deal out of that. That was something that was extraordinary -- that was probably China. We had much hacking going on. One of the things we’re going to do -- we have some of the greatest computer minds anywhere in the world that we've assembled. You saw just a sample of it two weeks ago up here we had the six top people in the world. They were never the same room together as a group.
Click to expand...
good. problem solve -it's about time we take some countermeasures..
 
anatta said:
i can't figure out who was leaking...there had to be leaking or Buzzfeed wouldn't just suddenly publish it.

good. problem solve -it's about time we take some countermeasures..
Click to expand...

So in other words Russian hacking into the election with the intent to elect a certain candidate and other possibilities will be minimized and forgotten in some new generalized study on hacking, that is probably 100% predictable, as will personally attacking anyone or media source that raises a question regarding it
 
archives said:
So in other words Russian hacking into the election with the intent to elect a certain candidate and other possibilities will be minimized and forgotten in some new generalized study on hacking, that is probably 100% predictable, as will personally attacking anyone or media source that raises a question regarding it
Click to expand...

This argument might work when you can prove it, until then fuck off prog dog.
 
Delirium Tremens said:
OMFG THIS IS SO AWESOME

whatever multiverse we split off into we hit the god damn jackpot

CALLED CNN FAKE NEWS lololololololol

liberals using the meme fakenews really fucked up. Repubs have flipped it so effortlessly
Click to expand...

Hardly, the Brietfart style news will give birth to endless innuendos, sorry, it ain't ever going away, probably has as much shelf life as Trump's Birther campaign
 
archives said:
So in other words Russian hacking into the election with the intent to elect a certain candidate and other possibilities will be minimized and forgotten in some new generalized study on hacking, that is probably 100% predictable, as will personally attacking anyone or media source that raises a question regarding it
Click to expand...
the "Russian hacking" has been done to death.
But put it in perspective -the election is over and no one claims it changed the results
( there are some doubts that Russia wasn't the only source for WIKI -but whatever -it's over)
If you want to cling to this as some kina moral victory -OK fine by me.

But Trump is looking forward.
He's got plans and initiatives,and he's addressing the general lack of cyber-security by the US gov't.
17th in his list-if its to be believed.

The peanut gallery can continue to pick and throw fits..and no he's not going after the press except for where it deserves for it's dishonest reportage...MoveOn for the rest of the nation's business.

WaPo is a Joke. NYTimes confessed to "advocacy journalism" ( WTF that is supposed to be?)
Maybe the press needs to clean up it's act? If not Trump bypasses the Fake News Folks
 
Guille said:
This argument might work when you can prove it, until then fuck off prog dog.
Click to expand...

Really, now you need proof? You believed the Clintons were responsible for everything from murder to "mafia style" criminality without proof, and I'm sure you still do, but now you need proof?
 
anatta said:
the "Russian hacking" has been done to death.
But put it in perspective -the election is over and no one claims it changed the results
( there are some doubts that Russia wasn't the only source for WIKI -but whatever -it's over)
If you want to cling to this as some kina moral victory -OK fine by me.

But Trump is looking forward.
He's got plans and initiatives,and he's addressing the general lack of cyber-security by the US gov't.
17th in his list-if its to be believed.

The peanut gallery can continue to pick and throw fits..and no he's not going after the press except for where it deseres for it's dishonest reportage.

Wapo is a Joke. NYTimes confessed to "advocacy journalism" ( WTF that is supposed to be?)
Maybe the press needs to clean up it's act? If not Trump bypasses the Fake News Folks
(
Click to expand...

I got it, let's move on, a foreign nation hostile to the US orchestrates a spy campaign to discredit our democratic institutions and it doesn't matter cause that was three months ago

You supported "investigating" everything Clinton for years for pure political purposes but something like a challenge to what makes us a democracy isn't important

Of course Trump is supposedly moving forward, he has to, why find out anything that wouldn't fit the scenario he's sold

Hate to tell you, it ain't going away
 
Thing1 said:
Do any of you Trumpsters see the irony of this...at ALL?
Click to expand...

i didn't support it then (the birth certificate stuff), I don't support it now. Seems your kind though didn't support it then but do support it now? Is that correct?
 
I happened to see that sensationalist flunky Brian Williams at the gym reception area TV last night ( didn't want anybody to think I actually tune in to that crap). He was going full throttle with his now infamous fake 'concern' about Trump, the Russians and insinuating there is treason by Trump.
At least MSNBC has BW in the right place finally.
 
archives said:
Really, now you need proof? You believed the Clintons were responsible for everything from murder to "mafia style" criminality without proof, and I'm sure you still do, but now you need proof?
Click to expand...

Don't make me call out the fallacy ref. I didn't have a problem with Bill. I do have a problem with Hillary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top