New unemployment rate checks in at 4.7%'

archives said:
Not with me, but I always find it interesting how since 1/08 conservatives have come up with new indicators to measure unemployment. By the way, the participation measure implied does not take into consideration the baby boomers retiring
Click to expand...

what new indicators......using the same indicators unemployment was lower than Obama's average in 92 out of 92 months of the Bush administration.........
 
Nomad said:
Trump is a Republican.


Or didn't you know that?
Click to expand...

and yet, Obama beat the odds and had a worse economy than all the presidents before him combined, including Bush.......to the tune of an additional $10 trillion dollars in national debt........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and yet, Obama beat the odds and had a worse economy than all the presidents before him combined, including Bush.......to the tune of an additional $10 trillion dollars in national debt........
Click to expand...

Do you have to take slump's wang out of your mouth before you spout your lies, or is it so small you can slurp on it and lie at the same time?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
what new indicators......using the same indicators unemployment was lower than Obama's average in 92 out of 92 months of the Bush administration.........
Click to expand...

How many trillion dollars did Obama waste getting us involved in an unnecessary war compared to Bush, Einstein?
 
Nomad said:
it has been shown that the economy always does better under Democrat administrations.
Click to expand...
Is that why Jimmy Carter lost re-election in 1980? Because the economy was doing so well? Ever since Carter's defeat, every Democrat president entered their first administration with a Democrat-controlled Congress, and was immediately met with the American public's resounding rejection of that Democrat-controlled Congress the very first chance they got and had a Republican-controlled House every year after that...
 
Nomad said:
How many trillion dollars did Obama waste getting us involved in an unnecessary war compared to Bush, Einstein?
Click to expand...

first, Bush spent less than a trillion in Iraq.....second, I'm not sure how much Obama spent in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Afghanistan, Yemen.....omigorsh, did I get them all?......its so hard to keep track........
 
Thing1 said:
It doesn't seem that you know what an economy is.
Click to expand...

your errors are not my problem....did you think the economy had nothing to do with national debt or record numbers of people out of the workforce.....the decimation of the middle class.....the total destruction of the health care industry.......there's more to the economy than Wall Street bankers getting rich on the stock exchange.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
your errors are not my problem....did you think the economy had nothing to do with national debt or record numbers of people out of the workforce.....the decimation of the middle class.....the total destruction of the health care industry.......there's more to the economy than Wall Street bankers getting rich on the stock exchange.......
Click to expand...

"The decimation of the middle class"..."the TOTAL destruction of the health care industry" - do you even know what these things mean?

What a hack.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
first, Bush spent less than a trillion in Iraq.....second, I'm not sure how much Obama spent in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Afghanistan, Yemen.....omigorsh, did I get them all?......its so hard to keep track........
Click to expand...

Wrong as usual.

Iraq war costs U.S. more than $2 trillion: study

By Daniel Trotta | NEW YORK

The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest, a study released on Thursday said.

The war has killed at least 134,000 Iraqi civilians and may have contributed to the deaths of as many as four times that number, according to the Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University.

When security forces, insurgents, journalists and humanitarian workers were included, the war's death toll rose to an estimated 176,000 to 189,000, the study said.
Click to expand...

Whatever limited military engagements Obama led, they didn't cost a fraction of what Iraq did.

How many thousand US service personnel deaths and permanent injuries is Obama responsible for compared to Bush?

Bush was a failed Republican Presidents who, like slump, was a tragic mistake. Compared to the failure of Bush, Obama was a sailing, flying success.

That you wingnuts try to paint it as otherwise is just more incontrovertible evidence that you all are, to a person, flagrant, flaming liars.
 
Thing1 said:
I'm sure we'll hear all about the 100 million who have stopped searching and no longer count, from the same crew who said Obama would have us at double-digit unemployment today because of the stimulus.
Click to expand...

Well then shuddup about it. You're sick of hearing it over and over and we're getting worn out with all your incessant whining over the same shit too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top