Why is Trump lending Mexico Money for the wall?

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
SO we are building the wall that Mexico is going to pay for on Credit?

Why are we lending Mexico money to pay for the wall?

Why are we financing it? How much interest are we going to charge? What happens if they default?
 
SO we are building the wall that Mexico is going to pay for on Credit?

Why are we lending Mexico money to pay for the wall?

Why are we financing it? How much interest are we going to charge? What happens if they default?

Hey TARD, who is the President right now?
 
Trump is a bad combination of ego and ambition.

First it was a wall from the Gulf coast to the Pacific coast.
After waffling on that,
maybe a little bit fence.

Mexico's position is unambiguously and explicitly clear.

"I'm not going to pay for that %$#@ wall!"
former Mexico President Vicente Fox ~160225, commenting on Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump's claim that as U.S. president he'd build a multi-$Billion dollar wall on the U.S. / Mexico border, and get Mexico to pay for it


Bottom line, if the U.S. doesn't pay, the wall won't be built.

If Trump wants the wall to be built to sooth his fragile ego, it's going to cost U.S. $huge.
 
Trump is a bad combination of ego and ambition.

First it was a wall from the Gulf coast to the Pacific coast.
After waffling on that,
maybe a little bit fence.

Mexico's position is unambiguously and explicitly clear.

"I'm not going to pay for that %$#@ wall!"
former Mexico President Vicente Fox ~160225, commenting on Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump's claim that as U.S. president he'd build a multi-$Billion dollar wall on the U.S. / Mexico border, and get Mexico to pay for it


Bottom line, if the U.S. doesn't pay, the wall won't be built.

If Trump wants the wall to be built to sooth his fragile ego, it's going to cost U.S. $huge.

Parts of a wall will clearly be built, at taxpayers expense. Their will never be a wall like Trump promised, and Mexico wont contribute a dime.
 
Trump is a bad combination of ego and ambition.

First it was a wall from the Gulf coast to the Pacific coast.
After waffling on that,
maybe a little bit fence.

Mexico's position is unambiguously and explicitly clear.

"I'm not going to pay for that %$#@ wall!"
former Mexico President Vicente Fox ~160225, commenting on Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump's claim that as U.S. president he'd build a multi-$Billion dollar wall on the U.S. / Mexico border, and get Mexico to pay for it


Bottom line, if the U.S. doesn't pay, the wall won't be built.

If Trump wants the wall to be built to sooth his fragile ego, it's going to cost U.S. $huge.

Parts of a wall will clearly be built, at taxpayers expense. Their will never be a wall like Trump promised, and Mexico wont contribute a dime.
 
So you're saying a guy who isn't in office yet is giving money to Mexico?

There is a guy scheduled to be president in two weeks and he is saying he is building a wall and Mexico will pay for it..... later.
 
"Aspergers boy strikes again."

You flatter me madame.

Suffice it to say, I'm capable of making a point without resorting to such a conspicuous insult, non sequitur combo as:

"Hey TARD, who is the President right now?" G #2 in more ways than one

We know it's Obama until ~noon on inauguration day.

And therefore what?

Can you really be so inarticulate that you can't form a short, declarative, elucidating sentence to introduce an informative concept?
 
Parts of a wall will clearly be built, at taxpayers expense. Their will never be a wall like Trump promised, and Mexico wont contribute a dime.

Just because you had a meal at Mara Lago really doesn't mean you're clairvoyant or that your hand is on the pulse of President Trump.
 
"Aspergers boy strikes again."

You flatter me madame.

Suffice it to say, I'm capable of making a point without resorting to such a conspicuous insult, non sequitur combo as:

"Hey TARD, who is the President right now?" G #2 in more ways than one

We know it's Obama until ~noon on inauguration day.

And therefore what?

Can you really be so inarticulate that you can't form a short, declarative, elucidating sentence to introduce an informative concept?

Yep, Aspergers.
 
"Yep, Aspergers." G #16

"I recognize your perspective yet reject it as valid, Aspergers Boy." G #18


a) Then "Nope", instead of "Yep" would have been the reply more indicative of your position.

b) Considering that, YOU continue to call ME "Aspergers"?
 
Back
Top