Trump 'win' is the worst popular vote performance since 1876

NOVA said:
Clinton’s 2.3-million-popular-vote plurality over Trump depends on the votes in a single state: California. Clinton has more than a 4-million-vote plurality over Trump there.

In the other 49 states plus the District of Columbia, Trump actually has a 1.7-million-popular-vote plurality over Clinton. So California single-handedly turns a Trump plurality into a Clinton plurality.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-hillary-clinton-supporters-need-to-quit-whining-ab out-the-electoral-college-2016-11-30

Is this too much of a perplexing logic problem for you ?
Click to expand...

And more than half of that 1.7 million advantage is TX. So what's your point?

I guess you need a primer on this: in general, there are more people in really big states.
 
blackascoal said:
That's not at all surprising my friend.

Look at it this way .. democrats and the Left are not under any pressure to produce nor support anything coming from Trump.

ALL the pressure is on Trump and his mindless supporters. He HAS to produce, and he has to maintain an economy as least as good as the one he walked into .. and he has no experience on how to do that.

WE get to tear them a new ass everytime Trump fumbles .. and we get to energize and fire up our side of the political fence without consequence.

WE can even just make shit up and attack Trump with it .. which is exactly the tack they employed with Obama. Although attacking a politicians family is beneath us, we can even do that now .. and there is no better target to shoot at then a 'first lady' who has her ass, tits, and pubic hairs plastered all over the planet. :0)

WE can do anything to them, attack every fiber of what they are .. while they scramble to produce..
Click to expand...

CRY HARDER BAC, CRY HARDER; BECAUSE I FIND IT AMUSING. :D
 
Thing1 said:
And more than half of that 1.7 million advantage is TX. So what's your point?

I guess you need a primer on this: in general, there are more people in really big states.
Click to expand...

Exactly the reason we have an electoral college.....so big, heavy populated states don't overrule the rest of the small states......
States like Deleware, ND., R.I., Vermont, etc. wouldn't have a voice in a presidential election....THINK.
 
Last edited:
NOVA said:
Exactly the reason we have an electoral college.....so big, heavy populated states don't overrule the rest of the small states......
States like Deleware, NJ., R.I., Vermont, etc. wouldn't have a voice in a presidential election....THINK.
Click to expand...

I know why the electoral college exists. I don't necessarily oppose it.

But it's BS that we have a GOP controlled gov't - Presidency, House & Senate - when more people voted Dem. And gerrymandering is BS, as well.
 
Rana said:
I voted for Nancy Murkowski, I support women who support their constituents.
Click to expand...


i hope you feel empowered and strong in aiding the ya ya sisterhood in electing the town foliage regulator. lol. Go get em rana! We hear you roar!
 
blackascoal said:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/18/politics/electoral-college-donald-trump-monday/index.html

... and his electoral College 'win' will be among the slimmest in American history.

Trump claims a "landslide" .. he's lying .. again.
Click to expand...

What then do you call Clinton's loss....the best loser in history? This is not even close to the 2000 attempt by the left to steal an election. The crying, grinding and gnashing of teeth...not to mention the HISSSSSSSSSSSSINGGGGGGGGG is quite entertaining. But....I suppose FALSE HOPE is better than the no hope of accepting the reality of an ass kick'n. The demwits will be sucking soup through a straw for decades to come.
 
Ralph said:
What then do you call Clinton's loss....the best loser in history? This is not even close to the 2000 attempt by the left to steal an election. The crying, grinding and gnashing of teeth...not to mention the HISSSSSSSSSSSSINGGGGGGGGG is quite entertaining. But....I suppose FALSE HOPE is better than the no hope of accepting the reality of an ass kick'n. The demwits will be sucking soup through a straw for decades to come.
Click to expand...

I'd say this year is far worse than 2000. At least in 2000 both sides had lawyers present, playing with the hanging chads. This year only the left is organizing to take to the streets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top