Virginia Gov. Pardons 60,000 Felons with autopen

anatta

100% recycled karma
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe has granted voting rights to as many as 60,000 convicted felons just in time for them to register to vote, nearly five times more than previously reported and enough to win the state for his long-time friend, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

McAuliffe sought to allow all of Virginia’s estimated 200,000 felons to vote, but state courts said each individual felon’s circumstances must be weighed. To get around that, McAuliffe used a mechanical autopen to rapidly sign thousands of letters, as if he had personally reviewed them, even as his office was saying the total was 13,000.

Now, The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has learned that McAuliffe — who managed Clinton’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential campaign — churned out five times as many letters before the registration deadline than publicly claimed.

Virginia’s recent political history has seen multiple races that were decided by tiny margins. The 2014 U.S. Senate race, for example, was decided by only 17,000 votes, while the attorney general’s race came down to a mere 165 votes

the Virginia chief executive claimed to have “no idea” how felons would vote and said he had never thought about it. Clinton’s staff emailed him after the 200,000-voters move to call it a “great announcement” and set up a call about it

ginia officials expressed surprise that McAuliffe had signed so many more letters than previously reported. Registrars and state legislators told TheDCNF they had no idea, and even officers of the state Board of Elections were kept in the dark.

Registrars could look up a felon’s status one name at a time in a Secretary of the Commonwealth database, if they had his or her Social Security number, but the system didn’t display the total number of those restored.

Lashawnda S. Singleton, spokesman for Virginia’s Secretary of the Commonwealth, did not respond to TheDCNF’s request for the data.

After TheDCNF asked Clara Belle Wheeler, vice-chairman of the Virginia Board of Elections and a Republican, she was told by Edgardo Cortes, Commissioner of the Department of Elections, that the total was somewhere between 50,000 and 60,000.

“Cortes stated that the names were available to the general registrars thru the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s website. He stated that the number was between 50 and 60,000 names. He was unable to be more precise,” Wheeler told TheDCNF.

“He assured me that the entire 216,000 felons were not sent voter registration cards. He stated that only those who had completed voter registration forms which were submitted to the general registrars either in paper forms or via the on-line citizen portal were registered to vote. He did not know the number of felons whose rights had been restored who have registered to vote,” she said.

Those who received McAuliffe’s letter also got voter registration forms with pre-paid return postage. No others in Virginia received such a service.

When TheDCNF pointed out that 60,000 could tip an election, Wheeler said “I am acutely and chronically aware of that.” She also noted that McAuliffe has explicitly asked felons to vote for Clinton.

Wheeler said the last-minute, highly unorthodox flood of individual restorations had to be processed by registrars who were already overwhelmed by failing computer systems.

She also said that, while McAuliffe claimed to only be restoring voting rights of felons who had completed their sentences, his use of the autopen might not satisfy the court’s specific vetting requirement.

“I think the General Assembly caucus that brought suit made it abundantly clear that you must look at each person and evaluate each individual person’s record: have they served their time, have they paid their restoration if it was due, have they finished their probation, are they citizens, have they not been arrested for some other crime,” Wheeler said.

“T
he code of Virginia requires that each person is treated as an individual rather than as a bulk because each individual has a different set of circumstances and those should be evaluated,” she said.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/06/e...ardons-60000-felons-enough-to-swing-election/
 
more Clinton crony sleeze.

Obviously the intent of the Commonwealth's ruling is that felony pardons must be done on an individual basis.
damn the ethics -full speed ahead.

When we don't hold officials accountable, they corrupt the system.

When the system is corrupted the rule of law no longer applies
 
They did follow the law???

Just like the dirty did while paying no taxes, stiffing those small business owners & perVing around @ his beauty contestants @ the pageants & going bankrupt a bunch of times.....
 
They did follow the law???

Just like the dirty did while paying no taxes, stiffing those small business owners & perVing around @ his beauty contestants @ the pageants & going bankrupt a bunch of times.....
C'mon. those are business practices, and the recourse is civil suit.

This is Clinton cronyism -sidestepping the GA suit and violating the courts intent.
Not that the Clintonistas ever cared about skating around the law -but it's corruption of Office
 
C'mon. those are business practices, and the recourse is civil suit.

This is Clinton cronyism -sidestepping the GA suit and violating the courts intent.
Not that the Clintonistas ever cared about skating around the law -but it's corruption of Office

I never thought I would live to see the day you would begrudge citizens the right to vote in their own country Cos..........

It's legal, it's done, you should get over it quick, the worst is yet to come........
 
Just incredible. Pardons are supposed to be handled on a case by case basis with thorough vetting. But dems say no way - we need to cheat to win the election.
 
Thorough vetting~to vote....... American citizens.............:palm:

Letting ppl vote is = to cheating........ wtf has happened to this country??
 
I never thought I would live to see the day you would begrudge citizens the right to vote in their own country Cos..........

It's legal, it's done, you should get over it quick, the worst is yet to come........

how dare you say that! I really take offense.
It's not legal- it's clearly an attempt to circumvent the courts ruling.
I have no problem with giving felons immediate right to vote upon release.

But THE LAW and the intent has to be followed, and when we corrupt the courts ( the Clinton's specialty)
we have imperious government..

autopen my ass.

“I think the General Assembly caucus that brought suit made it abundantly clear that you must look at each person and evaluate each individual person’s record
 
Thorough vetting~to vote....... American citizens.............:palm:

Letting ppl vote is = to cheating........ wtf has happened to this country??
I take it back. I take no offense in that you clearly do not understand the issue here. the VETTING is a Va. requirement
( vetting = meaning each case has to be looked at as a pardon)

how do you vet with a mass auto pen?
 
1. They're EX-felons. They paid their debt.
2. This happened three months ago.
3. It was legal.
4. It was not unprecedented.
5. McAuliffe's memo here: http://governor.virginia.gov/newsroom/newsarticle?articleId=16491
6. It's uncertain how many ex-felons registered to vote.
7. Of those who did register, it's uncertain who they will vote for.

And

State approaches to felon disenfranchisement vary tremendously. In Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated. In Florida, Iowa and Virginia, felons and ex-felons permanently lose their right to vote. Virginia and Florida have supplementary programs which facilitate gubernatorial pardons. The remaining states each have their own approaches to the issue.

  • In 38 states and the District of Columbia, most ex-felons automatically gain the right to vote upon the completion of their sentence.
  • In some states, ex-felons must wait for a certain period of time after the completion of their sentence before rights can be restored.
  • In some states, an ex-felon must apply to have voting rights restored.

http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx
 
They did follow the law???

Just like the dirty did while paying no taxes, stiffing those small business owners & perVing around @ his beauty contestants @ the pageants & going bankrupt a bunch of times.....

It makes him "smart"...
 
  • In 38 states and the District of Columbia, most ex-felons automatically gain the right to vote upon the completion of their sentence.

  • in Virginia they get it by fraud.....this will throw the results of the Virginia ballot into question unless Hilliary wins by more than 60,000 votes.....
 
1. They're EX-felons. They paid their debt.
2. This happened three months ago.
3. It was legal.
4. It was not unprecedented.
5. McAuliffe's memo here: http://governor.virginia.gov/newsroom/newsarticle?articleId=16491
6. It's uncertain how many ex-felons registered to vote.
7. Of those who did register, it's uncertain who they will vote for.

And

State approaches to felon disenfranchisement vary tremendously. In Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated. In Florida, Iowa and Virginia, felons and ex-felons permanently lose their right to vote. Virginia and Florida have supplementary programs which facilitate gubernatorial pardons. The remaining states each have their own approaches to the issue.

  • In 38 states and the District of Columbia, most ex-felons automatically gain the right to vote upon the completion of their sentence.
  • In some states, ex-felons must wait for a certain period of time after the completion of their sentence before rights can be restored.
  • In some states, an ex-felon must apply to have voting rights restored.

http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/felon-voting-rights.aspx
all that is true except the MANNER of the autopen. ( and to be clear I support immediate restoration of rights)
REstorations cannot be done as a class action - and that is what the autopen does. They require individual review.
That was the basis of the GA suit beforehand where McAuliffe was shut down with his mass commutations.
(I think that's the 3 months ago ..not 100% sure on the timeline)
 
Back
Top