More Republicans expect Clinton, rather than Trump, to win U.S. election

Bill

Malarkeyville
Must be all that free press he got?? The conspiracy?? Rigged polls?? bad polls??:palm:


By Chris Kahn | NEW YORK

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday and conducted from Oct. 20 to Oct. 24 found that 41 percent of Republicans expected Clinton to win the Nov. 8 election, versus 40 percent who picked Trump.

That reflected a sharp decline in confidence from last month, when 58 percent of Republicans said they thought their party's nominee would win, versus 23 percent who expected Clinton to prevail.

Among Trump's supporters, 49 percent in the latest poll said they believed Trump would win, down from 67 percent who felt that way at the beginning of the month.

"There's still hope, I guess. I just don’t have a great deal of faith in a good portion of the American public," said Bert Horsley, 38, of Belgrade, Montana, who said he planned to vote for Trump even though he believed Clinton would win.

Horsley said he felt the country was leaning increasingly socialist and that voters were more inclined to focus on Trump's problems than on issues facing Clinton, including allegations she mishandled classified emails while secretary of state.

"The nation’s willing to overlook certain things in some people and not in others," he said.

Despite the growing pessimism, Trump, who trails Clinton in national opinion polls, still enjoys overwhelming support from members of his party. Some 79 percent of likely Republican voters said they would vote for him. Many said their support was rooted in an expectation he would promote a conservative agenda in Congress and appoint conservative justices to the Supreme Court.

Democrats appear to be strongly anticipating a Clinton presidency. Some 83 percent of Democrats said in the poll they thought she would win, while only 8 percent predicted Trump would become president. Among Clinton's supporters, 92 percent expected her to win, up from 83 percent a month earlier.

Clinton held a commanding lead in the race to win the Electoral College and claim the presidency, according to results from the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project released on Saturday.

CONFIDENCE DROP THIS MONTH

Trump, a businessman and former reality television star, has alarmed mainstream Republicans throughout his campaign by routinely bashing the political establishment and making a series of provocative statements.

He aroused criticism for belittling the parents of a U.S. soldier killed in the Iraq war, calling for a ban on admitting Muslims to the country and accusing a judge of bias because of his Hispanic heritage. He has also asserted, without showing evidence, that the U.S. electoral system is rigged.

But Republicans remained mostly confident in their candidate's chances until this month, when a videotape from 2005 was released in which Trump could be heard bragging in vulgar terms about kissing and groping women.

At least 10 women have since accused Trump of making unwanted sexual advances, including groping or kissing, from the early 1980s to 2007, according to reports in various news outlets. Trump has denied the women's allegations, calling them "totally and absolutely false" and has promised to sue the women after the election.

Trump has also deepened divisions within his party by refusing to promise to accept the outcome of the election. "I will keep you in suspense," he said when asked about the issue during an Oct. 19 debate with Clinton.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted online in English with American adults in all 50 states. The latest poll included 648 people who identified as Republicans and 771 people who identified as Democrats. It had a credibility interval, a measure of accuracy, of 4 percentage points.

(Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Peter Cooney)
 
I think most are shocked this is even a contest. The dems blind loyalty has them ignoring the obvious. She is so unauthentic, there is no way she gets ANYTHING done. She pretty much wants to coast into the Presidency and coast right through it. That's one of the reasons she takes so many breaks and does not make enough appearances. She knows she has that blind loyalty. The people who will pay for it are the ones they are fooling. I am not saying Trump is perfect, but he is way more authentic. I think its almost diabolic how Clinton has operated in public life for all these years. Its all about her political self-preservation. I know the dems sense this, but their stubbornness is prevailing. Its why Bernie was so popular - they knew he was out there, but he was much more authentic. She has counted on them abandoning that ideal. Like I said, she is borderline evil. This election is Evil disguised as Good VERSUS Good disguised as Evil(by the media).
 
I think most are shocked this is even a contest. The dems blind loyalty has them ignoring the obvious. She is so unauthentic, there is no way she gets ANYTHING done. She pretty much wants to coast into the Presidency and coast right through it. That's one of the reasons she takes so many breaks and does not make enough appearances. She knows she has that blind loyalty. The people who will pay for it are the ones they are fooling. I am not saying Trump is perfect, but he is way more authentic. I think its almost diabolic how Clinton has operated in public life for all these years. Its all about her political self-preservation. I know the dems sense this, but their stubbornness is prevailing. Its why Bernie was so popular - they knew he was out there, but he was much more authentic. She has counted on them abandoning that ideal. Like I said, she is borderline evil. This election is Evil disguised as Good VERSUS Good disguised as Evil(by the media).

IMHO she is more authentic (after 30 years) than he is, which, admittedly isn't saying much....
 
"ignoring the obvious. She is so unauthentic, there is no way she gets ANYTHING done."
a) Several recent authoritative polls show her with a commanding, decisive lead over Trump.

b) I doubt she's ahead because of authenticity. You think Trump is more authentic? Authentic what? New York shyster?
"there is no way she gets ANYTHING done."
If you're basing that on the Republican determination to remain obstructive:

“The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)

http://www.mediaite.com/online/whit...me-the-shameless-mitch-mcconnell-and-company/


Then I defer.

BUT !!

If you're basing your prediction of the future on previous U.S. federal performance, let's just consider what a few key Republicans had to say about Senator Clinton's performance.
Of the U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), former Speaker Newton Gingrich (R-GA) said: "She's serious, she's hard working, she is a first rate professional."

Supplementing that, (then) current RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman said:

"Senator Clinton is smart, uh, she's effective, uh ... very hard working."

Source: NBC-TV Meet The Press June 5, 2005
So you're asserting, now that she has even more experience, as Secretary of State,
now that she's proved herself as a tireless campaigner (she's been at it longer than Trump!), you're predicting she'll slack off?

Based on WHAT !?!?
 
IMHO she is more authentic (after 30 years) than he is, which, admittedly isn't saying much....

if you asked a thousand people what characteristic they recognize about Hilliary, not even most noticeable characteristic but even a list of a hundred of her characteristics, NONE would say authentic.........
 
So you're asserting, now that she has even more experience, as Secretary of State,
now that she's proved herself as a tireless campaigner (she's been at it longer than Trump!), you're predicting she'll slack off?

Based on WHAT !?!?
how about based on her total lack of accomplishments......
 
how about based on her total lack of accomplishments......
better: her list of screw ups.

1.Iraq vote
2.Libyan war
3.Desire to arm Syrian rebels
4.Russian reset
5.Still wants a "no fly" in Syria

^ that's quite a list of screw ups -now add in her gross disregard for cyber-security, and her corruption..
 
I think most are shocked this is even a contest. The dems blind loyalty has them ignoring the obvious. She is so unauthentic, there is no way she gets ANYTHING done. She pretty much wants to coast into the Presidency and coast right through it. That's one of the reasons she takes so many breaks and does not make enough appearances. She knows she has that blind loyalty. The people who will pay for it are the ones they are fooling. I am not saying Trump is perfect, but he is way more authentic. I think its almost diabolic how Clinton has operated in public life for all these years. Its all about her political self-preservation. I know the dems sense this, but their stubbornness is prevailing. Its why Bernie was so popular - they knew he was out there, but he was much more authentic. She has counted on them abandoning that ideal. Like I said, she is borderline evil. This election is Evil disguised as Good VERSUS Good disguised as Evil(by the media).
http://correctrecord.org/praise-for-hillary-clinton/#_Toc412019368
 
"how about based on her total lack of accomplishments......" Pm
And the fact that she's a unicorn! She'll be able to spear Putin with her horn at the summit meeting!
"better: her list of screw ups.

1.Iraq vote
2.Libyan war
3.Desire to arm Syrian rebels
4.Russian reset
5.Still wants a "no fly" in Syria #11
#1:
She was, we were LIED to. She made the wrong decision based upon wrong information.

"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt, that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
U.S. President Bush (the younger) televised address to the U.S. March 17th, 2003

That is an ABSOLUTE lie !!


#2:
The Republican demigod Ronald Reagan ordered a U.S. bombing raid against Quadaffy.
Quadaffy was tied definitively to the Lockerbie airliner bombing.
That means Quadaffy was a State sponsor of terrorism, a mass-murderer.
- Reagan wanted him out.
- Obama took him out. "better: her list of screw ups." Do tell!

#3:
Armed Services Chairman Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has be pleading w/ Obama to arm the Syrian rebels for years.
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) was the 2008 Republican party nominee for president of the United States of America; no insignificant personage.

#4:
Please cite 3 specific examples.

#5:
You don't?!
We had one in Iraq, and it worked great!
When Saddam painted a coalition no-fly zone patrol plane, we'd blow up the radar that painted it. SPECTACULAR!
You would deny Assad's forces the same courtesy?
"^ that's quite a list of screw ups -now add in her gross disregard for cyber-security, and her corruption.." #11
Indeed! It's an extraordinary list! By my count, a grand sum total of zero!

- what else you got ? -
 
if you asked a thousand people what characteristic they recognize about Hilliary, not even most noticeable characteristic but even a list of a hundred of her characteristics, NONE would say authentic.........

I believe the same could be said about trumpf-thus why I said more~compared to him...
 
Back
Top