What does the company you keep say about the way you live your own moral compass? Among the things you have in common with your friends and colleagues, should the world assume that means the worst acts of one of you? It’s a question a lot of people are asking lately about both Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
Their former associate Jeffrey E. Epstein, a billionaire businessman, is a convicted sex offender. The record on Epstein’s behavior is enough to make your skin crawl. But now that the Prince has been accused of sexual misconduct – and old pal Donald Trump’s history’s of friendship with him has been brought up in the press – the line between guilt and mere guilt by association is up for very public examination.
Beginning in 2008, Epstein served thirteen months for soliciting prostitution, following a lengthy Florida investigation involving allegations of “aggravated assault” of underage girls.
The Palm Beach police department’s 2006 affidavit included “sworn taped statements” from “five victims and seventeen witnesses” regarding unlawful sexual activity with girls, including one as young as fourteen, who were reportedly brought in to give him massages.
Since then, Epstein has reached out-of-court settlements with a number of the alleged victims.
Jane Doe 3 claims that she was procured for Epstein by the late mogul Robert Maxwell’s daughter Ghislaine beginning when she was fifteen – and that she was used as a “sex slave” and lent out “for sex to politically connected and financially powerful people.”
A motion filed in Florida goes on to say that “One such powerful individual Epstein forced Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was a member of the British royal family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).” The documents say that Epstein ordered the now 30 year-old woman to “give the prince whatever he demanded” and “report back on the details.”
Buckingham Palace, which rarely comments on allegations against the royal family, has strenuously denied the claim, saying, “This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a party. As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue.”
In 2011, Andrew resigned as “an ambassador for British businesses abroad” after his association with Epstein became known. That same year,
Vanity Fair reported that “According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Epstein’s Palm Beach estate, Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls.”
http://www.salon.com/2015/01/05/he_likes_beautiful_women_as_much_as_i_do_inside_the_latest_stormcloud_of_sex_abuse_allegations/
But you have never heard of him...but you constantly use his RULES FOR RADICALS...as just observed...."...silence those who don't agree with your methods." DENY, DENY, DENY.....yet another Alinsky rule for radicals to observe. Over 50 years ago.....The Hell you say....don't even bother referencing him? Judging by YOUR tactics....Alinsky is alive and well in the communist neighborhood. 
