375 Top Scientists Warn Us Not To Vote For Trump

[katsung47]

375 Top Scientists Warn Us Not To Vote For Trump

Stephen Hawking is among those who say the GOP nominee could prove disastrous for the planet.

09/21/2016

Hundreds of the world’s leading scientists, including famed physicist Stephen Hawking, warn in an open letter Tuesday that a Donald Trump win in November would prove disastrous to global efforts against climate change.

The Republican presidential nominee, who once claimed global warming is a hoax “created by and for the Chinese,” vowed in May that he would “cancel” the historic Paris climate agreement.

Opting out of that pact, write the 375 members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, including 30 Nobel Prize winners, would have “severe and long-lasting” consequences, both for the planet and for the United States’ credibility.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scientists-donald-trump_us_57e1ac04e4b0e80b1b9eda3d?

 

[Seahawk]

Okay.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Lolz, katsung is anti-Trump now. I can't believe he resurrects his account for this.

 

[signalmankenneth]

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Trumps supporters: "Scientists hate him? Well I hate science, so he must be doing something right!"

 

[canceled.2021.3]

375 Top Scientists Warn Us Not To Vote For Trump

Stephen Hawking is among those who say the GOP nominee could prove disastrous for the planet.

09/21/2016

Hundreds of the world’s leading scientists, including famed physicist Stephen Hawking, warn in an open letter Tuesday that a Donald Trump win in November would prove disastrous to global efforts against climate change.

The Republican presidential nominee, who once claimed global warming is a hoax “created by and for the Chinese,” vowed in May that he would “cancel” the historic Paris climate agreement.

Opting out of that pact, write the 375 members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, including 30 Nobel Prize winners, would have “severe and long-lasting” consequences, both for the planet and for the United States’ credibility.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scientists-donald-trump_us_57e1ac04e4b0e80b1b9eda3d?

Well if they say so...........

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Katsung is a pretty famous conspiracy theorist. You can find some of his threads in the conspiracy section, they ramble on for ages about conspiracies. Pretty sure he has a bot to post this shit (or else an unbelievable amount of freetime - he posts to bunches of other forums too).

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Well if they say so...........

Ignorant prole. Stupid wretches like you, the dregs of society, shouldn't be allowed to vote. Tell me, would the US be worse off in any way if you put a bullet in your worthless head? You're negative human. You're pure waste. You cost us by being alive.

 

[Irish]

So instead they want Illary CUnton? We are doubly dead if she gets in there.

 

[Celticguy]

Reason enough to vote for him

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Trumps supporters: "Scientists hate him? Well I hate science, so he must be doing something right!"

Reason enough to vote for him

Called it.

 

[katsung47]

No CEOs at Fortune 100 Companies Are Backing Donald Trump

SEPTEMBER 24, 2016

But almost a third of them supported Republican nominee Mitt Romney in 2012
No chief executives at Fortune 100 companies have donated to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign through August, according to a new report.

According to a Wall Street Journal analysis of campaign donations, this is a drastic difference compared to the 2012 election, when the Journal reports that nearly a third of Fortune 100 CEOs supported the then Republican nominee Mitt Romney.

What’s more, 19 of the nation’s largest 100 companies gave to the other Republican candidates, including Go. Jeb Bush and Sen. Marco Rubio, during this year’s primaries. But since Trump became the GOP’s nominee, a whopping 89 out of the 100 top CEOs have not supported either presidential candidate. The remaining 11 have backed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, the Journal reports.

Elite Bundlers Raise More Than $113 Million for Hillary Clinton




http://fortune.com/2016/09/24/fortune-100-companies-donald-trump/?iid=leftrail
------------

 

[NOVA]

Reason enough to vote for him

This must be the same group of 'scientists' that have living off the taxpayers and pushing the warming myth for the last 20 years....lol

 

[PostmodernProphet]

yesterday Hillary was campaigning in Florida telling them the ocean was going to flood the state if they didn't vote for her.......I call that the high tide of liberal politics......

 

[katsung47]

Donald Trump Used Campaign Donations to Buy $55,000 of His Own Book

FEC rules dictate the Republican nominee must forgo royalties on the book’s sales, or else the $55,000 purchase at Barnes & Noble was illegal.

OLIVIA NUZZI
BEN COLLINS
08.23.16

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-donations-to-buy-55-000-of-his-own-book.html

 

[Darth Omar]

yesterday Hillary was campaigning in Florida telling them the ocean was going to flood the state if they didn't vote for her.......I call that the high tide of liberal politics......

I don't know, wasn't Obama going to lower the oceans?

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Hawking says whatever his govt tells him to say. He made a deal with them decades ago. You keep me alive and i'll be your mouthpiece.

 

[Granule]

I don't know, wasn't Obama going to lower the oceans?

He would need at least another 4 years in the White House to do that.

 

[Face Your]

375 Top Scientists Warn Us Not To Vote For Trump

Stephen Hawking is among those who say the GOP nominee could prove disastrous for the planet.

09/21/2016

Hundreds of the world’s leading scientists, including famed physicist Stephen Hawking, warn in an open letter Tuesday that a Donald Trump win in November would prove disastrous to global efforts against climate change.

The Republican presidential nominee, who once claimed global warming is a hoax “created by and for the Chinese,” vowed in May that he would “cancel” the historic Paris climate agreement.

Opting out of that pact, write the 375 members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, including 30 Nobel Prize winners, would have “severe and long-lasting” consequences, both for the planet and for the United States’ credibility.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scientists-donald-trump_us_57e1ac04e4b0e80b1b9eda3d?

Lolz man made global warming has been debunked by the email release. Just today the London School of Economics was outted as perpetrating a huge global warming embezzlement scam against the world.

 

[sear]

Quote Originally Posted by Darth Hussein Omar View Post
I don't know, wasn't Obama going to lower the oceans?

He would need at least another 4 years in the White House to do that." #18

“My next 100 days will be so successful, I will complete them in 72 days.” President Obama, at the Washington Correspondent’s dinner, early in his presidential tenure