Tax cut dont increase revenue

Gonzo you support just about everything this admin does even if you pretend to hate Bush.


You oooze hate for everything the left does.
 
Topspin said:
the post is redonkulus
I watch Laffer almost every night on Kudlow. He is big time tax cut and says most times they have paid for themselves.
I don't need some leftwing tard saying every PHD is his left wing dept.
Click to expand...


It's nonsense topper. You buy into it because you don't really care about revenues and just want a tax cut, which is fine. There is no need to lie about increased revenues though. Of course, it makes it much easier to be fiscally irresponsible but you don't really care about that either.
 
What do you have to say about Laffer and his admission the napkin curve is bullshit and the Clinton gets credit for the surpluses?
 
Desh said:
Gonzo you support just about everything this admin does even if you pretend to hate Bush.


You oooze hate for everything the left does.
Click to expand...

Like what? You have yet to name anything.

Because I support corporations? That is just common sense.

Because I am pro-choice? Yeah, Bush is real pro-choice.

What about me being pro-gay marriage? Yeah, I think that is in line with the administration as well.

Could it be because I don't read one blog and instantly support whatever it is I read? Because to me, that sounds like the problem you have with me...I won't buy into whatever bullshit you are selling today because I already know where I stand, how the government works (which you still haven't figured out), and how I am going to vote depending on the issue.
 
gonzojournals said:
Like what? You have yet to name anything.

Because I support corporations? That is just common sense.

Because I am pro-choice? Yeah, Bush is real pro-choice.

What about me being pro-gay marriage? Yeah, I think that is in line with the administration as well.

Could it be because I don't read one blog and instantly support whatever it is I read? Because to me, that sounds like the problem you have with me...I won't buy into whatever bullshit you are selling today because I already know where I stand, how the government works (which you still haven't figured out), and how I am going to vote depending on the issue.
Click to expand...

Desh votes the standard Lieberman Democrat line and thinks that its ok to be tricked by Bush...

CK
 
Desh said:
What do you have to say about Laffer and his admission the napkin curve is bullshit and the Clinton gets credit for the surpluses?
Click to expand...

Once again I have to say that Alan Greenspan was in charge of the Federal Reserve (which means he basically controlled the economy), that he was appointed by Reagan, and that Clinton opposed him on almost every decision he ever made (but then took credit for his successes).
 
Desh said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!

Oh my ,my ,my the heads are exploding now.
Click to expand...

My head is not exploding, and my irritation has nothing to do with this thread, it has to do with you, you dumb twat.

You seem to think that whenever anyone expresses frustration towards your partisan hackery that it means you have touched upon some sensitive issue that we are refusing to acknowledge--- we aren't. We are just going out of our minds batshit crazy because you are a giant cunt with a mental problem and you refuse to admit that you haven't researched a goddamn issue in your entire life, that instead you rely solely on what biased bloggers tell you but then dismiss the same level of evidence from the other side.
 
desh I'm always praising Clinton for the surpluses and laffer always gives Clinton credit.
Unlike you he's not brainwashed to hate the other party and assume they are 100% wrong.
Dungshit the numbers speak for themselves and collections went WAY up after the cuts.
 
gonzojournals said:
My head is not exploding, and my irritation has nothing to do with this thread, it has to do with you, you dumb twat.

You seem to think that whenever anyone expresses frustration towards your partisan hackery that it means you have touched upon some sensitive issue that we are refusing to acknowledge--- we aren't. We are just going out of our minds batshit crazy because you are a giant cunt with a mental problem and you refuse to admit that you haven't researched a goddamn issue in your entire life, that instead you rely solely on what biased bloggers tell you but then dismiss the same level of evidence from the other side.
Click to expand...




Laffer is now a biased blogger?


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!
 
If there's one thing that economists agree on, it's that these claims are false. We're not talking just ivory-tower lefties. Virtually every economics Ph.D. who has worked in a prominent role in the Bush Administration acknowledges that the tax cuts enacted during the past six years have not paid for themselves--and were never intended to. Harvard professor Greg Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisers from 2003 to 2005, even devotes a section of his best-selling economics textbook to debunking the claim that tax cuts increase revenues.

This article is from Time mag you dickweasel.
 
Desh said:
If there's one thing that economists agree on, it's that these claims are false. We're not talking just ivory-tower lefties. Virtually every economics Ph.D. who has worked in a prominent role in the Bush Administration acknowledges that the tax cuts enacted during the past six years have not paid for themselves--and were never intended to. Harvard professor Greg Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisers from 2003 to 2005, even devotes a section of his best-selling economics textbook to debunking the claim that tax cuts increase revenues.

This article is from Time mag you dickweasel.
Click to expand...


Time Magazine is a disingenious lying hack magazine...

Recent example Joe Klein writing about FISA....

Liberal bloggers have caused Time to write 2 corrections to his fake story....

CK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top