Tax cut dont increase revenue

problem with most dems is that they are trying to make case for tax increases.. but what choice will they pick from to do with the increase of taxes?

1) call it a surpluses and divvy out for special interest / programs
2) pay down debt.

you know they will argue about it.

Naah they will not argue, it will all go for number 1.

Just like their Republican counterparts.
 
if the dems sold me on it.. aka.. we will raise taxes but all senate and house members will sign oath under penalty of prison that the money will be earmarked for paying down deficit.. and or for some other issue that is important enough for the voting public to agree on then im open to the idea.

But problem is.. raise taxes.. nothing gets paid down. money gone.. Americans have less money. And they raise them at the point of a gun where we go to jail if we dont pay.. but they have zero accountability.

It amazes me how anyone even the most liberal dems on here are supporting tax increases under this current system of no accountability in government.
 
if the dems sold me on it.. aka.. we will raise taxes but all senate and house members will sign oath under penalty of prison that the money will be earmarked for paying down deficit.. and or for some other issue that is important enough for the votiing public to agree on then im open to the idea.

But problem is.. raise taxes.. nothing gets paid down. money gone.. Americans have less money.

Why do you hate America ?
It is the American way.
 
i actually support obamas SS plan.. but would want it to be federal law that ss be separated from the general budget.
 
OH lordry ,lordy the peopel oin the ohter site just said Laffer donesnt understand the theory and is stating it wrong.


They are like a bag of bricks.

Desh, another person would be able to laugh at them. You can not, because you are without a doubt the least intelligent person I have ever known--- therefore you have lost your right to condescend.
 
Bite my ass you little dweeb and face the facts your hero says his little napkin trick is full of shit and gives Clinton the credit for the surpluses of the 90s all in one fell swoop.

Neener ,neener ,neener you little wiener
 
Bite my ass you little dweeb and face the facts your hero says his little napkin trick is full of shit and gives Clinton the credit for the surpluses of the 90s all in one fell swoop.

Neener ,neener ,neener you little wiener

First of all, no president gets any credit for the economy because the Fed isn't run by the President...if anyone should get credit for the 90s it should be Alan Greenspan (who was appointed by Reagan, btw).

As far as the facts go, I don't believe I even argued anything in the thread, other than that you are a party hack whom everyone hates and you have absolutely nothing to brag about....you are neither capable of formulating the sorts of policies that you support, nor are you capable of rational debate besides repeatedly posting the same blog links and moving on to the next inane thread, usually something about an issue long dead (like Bush's credibility).

EDIT: And no, I'm not among the 30 percent, at least not in the way you mean it.
 
Laffer himself is now your enemy.

how funny is that one?

No one is my enemy. I don't make enemies based on ideology-- that is something for you proles to fight over because the politicans play you like fiddles.

I notice you have yet to argue anything I have said.
 
hide behind the guise you dont support what this admin does.

Anyone who reads your posts knows better.
 
hide behind the guise you dont support what this admin does.

Anyone who reads your posts knows better.

Ok, please quote some of my posts that show I support this administration....since you are clearly so aware of my personal views.

You have yet to comment on anything I have actually said.
 
the post is redonkulus
I watch Laffer almost every night on Kudlow. He is big time tax cut and says most times they have paid for themselves.
I don't need some leftwing tard saying every PHD is his left wing dept.
 
Back
Top