protectionist
Verified User
For all those liberals who walk around in a fog of ignorance, resulting from years of information deprivation from their liberal media, which only tells them what it wants to, the Explanatory Memorandum is one of the most important documents over discovered by the FBI. It is virtually the Muslim Brotherhood's declaration of war upon America, and all of western civilization.
In it, it describes the work of the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood in America) as being "...a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within...", and over the 25 years of its existence, in thousands of instances of stealth jihad (AKA Islamization), Muslim Brotherhood front groups (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, MAS, et al) have been QUIETLY going about the business of doing just that.
Unlike their more violent brethern (Hamas, ISIS, al Qaeda, etc) the Brotherhood could be described as "terrorists in suits", a term coined by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry in their book, "Muslim Mafia." It's a fitting description of an overall, decentralized, subversive organization, that specializes in Islamizing America slowly "from within", by the use of lawsuits, and the threat of them.
Quite astounding, that we have a presidential candidate, whose right hand woman, Huma Abedin, is a long-time operative in the Muslim Brotherhood, having held an important position in the Muslim Brotherthood's founding American front group MSA (Muslim Students Association), when she was a student at Georgetown University. Even worse, she was a member of the Brotherhood group, the IMMA (Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs), and was the co-editor of it's publication JMMA (Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs), and incredibly, served as Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton, in the US State Dept for 4 years. During this time, the record of the State Dept could easily be described as one which served the interests of the Muslim Brotherhood, a lot more than it served the USA, or our allies.
So, here's the question. Since I have NEVER heard of a single Muslim Brotherhood person (in 25 years time) ever disavow the Explanatory Memorandum, and with Huma Abedin seeking to be the close advisor to a possible President of the United States, does Huma Abedin disavow the Muslim Brotherthood's Explanatory Memorandum, which advocates the destruction and elimination of western civilization, and it's replacement with an Islamic state ? And would her advise to Hillary be akin to the pro-Muslim Brotherhood things that were so evident in their 4 years in the State Dept., or would she be loyal to the United States ?
From the Explanatory Memorandum— the Muslim Brotherhood in America in its own words >>>
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
In it, it describes the work of the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood in America) as being "...a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within...", and over the 25 years of its existence, in thousands of instances of stealth jihad (AKA Islamization), Muslim Brotherhood front groups (CAIR, ISNA, MSA, MAS, et al) have been QUIETLY going about the business of doing just that.
Unlike their more violent brethern (Hamas, ISIS, al Qaeda, etc) the Brotherhood could be described as "terrorists in suits", a term coined by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry in their book, "Muslim Mafia." It's a fitting description of an overall, decentralized, subversive organization, that specializes in Islamizing America slowly "from within", by the use of lawsuits, and the threat of them.
Quite astounding, that we have a presidential candidate, whose right hand woman, Huma Abedin, is a long-time operative in the Muslim Brotherhood, having held an important position in the Muslim Brotherthood's founding American front group MSA (Muslim Students Association), when she was a student at Georgetown University. Even worse, she was a member of the Brotherhood group, the IMMA (Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs), and was the co-editor of it's publication JMMA (Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs), and incredibly, served as Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton, in the US State Dept for 4 years. During this time, the record of the State Dept could easily be described as one which served the interests of the Muslim Brotherhood, a lot more than it served the USA, or our allies.
So, here's the question. Since I have NEVER heard of a single Muslim Brotherhood person (in 25 years time) ever disavow the Explanatory Memorandum, and with Huma Abedin seeking to be the close advisor to a possible President of the United States, does Huma Abedin disavow the Muslim Brotherthood's Explanatory Memorandum, which advocates the destruction and elimination of western civilization, and it's replacement with an Islamic state ? And would her advise to Hillary be akin to the pro-Muslim Brotherhood things that were so evident in their 4 years in the State Dept., or would she be loyal to the United States ?
From the Explanatory Memorandum— the Muslim Brotherhood in America in its own words >>>
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
(CAIR, ISNA, MSA, IIIT, MAS, MWL, MPAC, etc)
