Malania Trump's speech stolen from Michelle's word for word.

Clinton has outspent trump 40:1 btw

also saw a recent poll showing trump won't be lower than Romney with Hispanics in spite of his comments.
 
I used to think Darcula was more politically astute than this. I guess I was wrong. It is a tempest in a teapot. But maybe Darcula really believes this is going to drive everyone to Crooked Hillary.
 
haven't seen the speeches yet but I mean these speeches are always the same anyway wouldn't really supeise me if the same type of phrasing pops up. As mott said it's always boilerplate bullshit
 
[h=1]Poll: Clinton and Trump Now Tied as GOP Convention Kicks Off[/h]
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are virtually tied in the polls as the Republican National Convention convenes in Cleveland this week. Clinton now just barely edges out Trump in a direct head-to-head match-up, 46 percent to 45 percent. This is slightly down from the 3-point lead she held in last week's tracking poll numbers.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/amp/poll-clinton-trump-now-tied-gop-convention-kicks-n611936

Trump is still getting his ass kicked in the electoral college and trails in all but one swing State.
 
Oh give me a break Darla. It was a canned speech by a candidates spouse. I could have cared less if she quoted Shakespeare.

That's not what you said. You claimed: For it to have been plagerism (sic) Michelle would have had to of (sic) written her speech which she didn't.

You don't know what you're talking about Mr. great Scientific mind, you stepped in it, don't spin it now. Admit it, and move on.
 
Clinton has outspent trump 40:1 btw

also saw a recent poll showing trump won't be lower than Romney with Hispanics in spite of his comments.
last night they said Trump was 12 points behind where Romney was at this stage and the Romney campaign was concerned about where they were polling with good reason.
 
haven't seen the speeches yet but I mean these speeches are always the same anyway wouldn't really supeise me if the same type of phrasing pops up. As mott said it's always boilerplate bullshit

Well, it's a convention so you expect that.

But if the objective was to portray Hillary as crime friendly, it was a home run.
 
That's not what you said. You claimed: For it to have been plagerism (sic) Michelle would have had to of (sic) written her speech which she didn't.

You don't know what you're talking about Mr. great Scientific mind, you stepped in it, don't spin it now. Admit it, and move on.
Do you really believe Michelle wrote her speech and not some staff writer?
 
Do you really believe Michelle wrote her speech and not some staff writer?

Excuse me, that is not the issue. This was your claim, once again:

You claimed: For it to have been plagerism (sic) Michelle would have had to of (sic) written her speech which she didn't.

Do you stand by this claim? It would not be plagiarism if Michelle didn't write the speech?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top