Growth of America's Upper-Middle Class

cawacko

Well-known member
People talk a lot about the shrinking of the American middle class. One of the reasons for that is the number of middle class people moving into the upper middle class category. Of course there are also those moving from middle class to working class.

(I do question some of the premise of the article however. $100K for a family of three = upper middle class?)



America's upper middle class is thriving


The middle class may be feeling squeezed, but the upper middle class is enjoying good times.

The upper middle class grew to 29.4% of the population in 2014, up from 12.9% in 1979, according to a new Urban Institute report. It defines this group as having household income of between $100,000 and $350,000 for a three-person family.

The rich also expanded their ranks, to 1.8%, up from 0.1%.

The middle class, meanwhile, shrunk -- to 32%, from 38.8%. And the share of lower middle class and poor Americans also declined.

It's not surprising that the report shows a nation that is moving up the economic ladder. That's because the institute held fixed the income ranges needed to be in a class, adjusting only for inflation. Over time, wages have grown faster than inflation.

In 1979, the upper middle class would have brought in between $36,500 and $127,700 a year.

Other studies have also shown that many middle class families have moved into the upper class, but they also found that some Americans have slipped into the working class.


The Urban analysis, however, shows that the standard of living has gone up for nearly all Americans, said report author Stephen Rose, an affiliated scholar at Urban. For instance, there are more families with three cars than there are with no cars, and the median size of a new home has grown to 2,500-square-feet in 2014, from 1,650-square-feet in 1979, he said.


Still, the rich and upper middle class have gotten a disproportionate share of the income gains. While much of the growth comes from the increase in their ranks, proportionately that would only give them control over 57% of the nation's income in 2014. Instead, their share was 63%, up from 30% in 1979.

Looking just at the upper middle class, they controlled 52.1% of total income in 2014, up from 29.6% in 1979. But had their income growth kept pace with their population expansion, they'd only control 48%.

upper middle class nation income

This shows the income gains have been broader based than just the ultra-rich, Rose said.

"It's just not true that the Top 1% got it all," he said.


http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/21/news/economy/upper-middle-class/index.html
 
People talk a lot about the shrinking of the American middle class. One of the reasons for that is the number of middle class people moving into the upper middle class category. Of course there are also those moving from middle class to working class.

(I do question some of the premise of the article however. $100K for a family of three = upper middle class?)



America's upper middle class is thriving


The middle class may be feeling squeezed, but the upper middle class is enjoying good times.

The upper middle class grew to 29.4% of the population in 2014, up from 12.9% in 1979, according to a new Urban Institute report. It defines this group as having household income of between $100,000 and $350,000 for a three-person family.

The rich also expanded their ranks, to 1.8%, up from 0.1%.

The middle class, meanwhile, shrunk -- to 32%, from 38.8%. And the share of lower middle class and poor Americans also declined.

It's not surprising that the report shows a nation that is moving up the economic ladder. That's because the institute held fixed the income ranges needed to be in a class, adjusting only for inflation. Over time, wages have grown faster than inflation.

In 1979, the upper middle class would have brought in between $36,500 and $127,700 a year.

Other studies have also shown that many middle class families have moved into the upper class, but they also found that some Americans have slipped into the working class.


The Urban analysis, however, shows that the standard of living has gone up for nearly all Americans, said report author Stephen Rose, an affiliated scholar at Urban. For instance, there are more families with three cars than there are with no cars, and the median size of a new home has grown to 2,500-square-feet in 2014, from 1,650-square-feet in 1979, he said.


Still, the rich and upper middle class have gotten a disproportionate share of the income gains. While much of the growth comes from the increase in their ranks, proportionately that would only give them control over 57% of the nation's income in 2014. Instead, their share was 63%, up from 30% in 1979.

Looking just at the upper middle class, they controlled 52.1% of total income in 2014, up from 29.6% in 1979. But had their income growth kept pace with their population expansion, they'd only control 48%.

upper middle class nation income

This shows the income gains have been broader based than just the ultra-rich, Rose said.

"It's just not true that the Top 1% got it all," he said.


http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/21/news/economy/upper-middle-class/index.html

I don't question the amount. More than one on here has indicated that a family of four with a gross income of over $48,000 is poor.
 
I don't question the amount. More than one on here has indicated that a family of four with a gross income of over $48,000 is poor.

This is one of those things that is very regional. I live in a pretty ridiculous area, and it's sort of silly what constitutes even "middle class" here. It's the same w/ the minimum wage argument. Cost of living differences are pretty big around the country.
 
I don't question the amount. More than one on here has indicated that a family of four with a gross income of over $48,000 is poor.

I have a hard time believing you can be considered upper middle class and yet not be able to afford a home.
 
I have a hard time believing you can be considered upper middle class and yet not be able to afford a home.

Someone making $100,000 should be able to afford a home. Not being able to buy as expensive of a house as one wants doesn't mean they can't afford a house.

I don't consider $48,000 as upper middle class but it isn't poor either. For that family of four with an income of $48,000 can afford to buy a house.
 
so.... you keep the number thresholds the same despite inflation and just declare more people rich?

inflation determines how much your money is worth yes?
 
Someone making $100,000 should be able to afford a home. Not being able to buy as expensive of a house as one wants doesn't mean they can't afford a house.

I don't consider $48,000 as upper middle class but it isn't poor either. For that family of four with an income of $48,000 can afford to buy a house.

In many areas I'm sure one can but definitely not all.
 
In many areas I'm sure one can but definitely not all.

Sure they can. Again, not being able to buy the more expensive one doesn't equal being unable to do so.

What you have to remember is other than the 7 5/8% for FICA, they have no other federal taxes. If they pay no federal taxes, in my state, they pay no state income taxes either.
 
Sure they can. Again, not being able to buy the more expensive one doesn't equal being unable to do so.

What you have to remember is other than the 7 5/8% for FICA, they have no other federal taxes. If they pay no federal taxes, in my state, they pay no state income taxes either.

A couple making $100K in San Francisco cannot buy a single family here unless they have saved up a large down payment over a number of years.
 
There aren't houses in San Francisco for less than $350,000?

Not single family. (I'd have to check but it's possible in the worst part of town there could be a tear down at that price but I doubt it. Now I know the rest of the country isn't like this but that's our realty here.)
 
Not single family. (I'd have to check but it's possible in the worst part of town there could be a tear down at that price but I doubt it. Now I know the rest of the country isn't like this but that's our realty here.)

Are there places to own, not rent, for less than $350,000?
 
One variable too would be interesting to know in their calculations, are they counting just one or two people in the family working to earn the $100K income? Two teachers could be married for instance and make $100K but most people probably wouldn't consider them upper middle class.
 
Back
Top