White Judges!

Thing1 said:
His advisors have to be going out of their minds. If he was a mature adult who could actually focus on issues, he'd have won this past week easily.

I'm sure he thinks Hispanics still love him. They do make those wonderful taco bowls, after all.
Click to expand...

In Trump's tiny ego driven mind, losing the Trump-You case is a bigger deal than losing the entire Hispanic electorate.
The man has no perspective.
 
In Trumps little mind, he believes what he keeps saying is true... "Everyone who "went to" Trump You was very happy, but the Class Action lawyers have made up something to force a lawsuit.
 
Jarod said:
In Trumps little mind, he believes what he keeps saying is true... "Everyone who "went to" Trump You was very happy, but the Class Action lawyers have made up something to force a lawsuit.
Click to expand...

he says most people were happy. Theoretically since only 1/3rd asked for a refund and only 35/7000 complained to the ftc he would have a valid statement.
 
Jarod said:
I have actually never voted for her for anything. IN two separate primaries I voted for her opponent. I like her better than many choices, but she has never been my first choice.

She voted for the war in Iraq.
She is on some subjects more conservative than me.
She is in with Wall Street.
She is in with Corporate America.

I don't like these things, but she is not:

A Racist
A bully
Thin skinned
Likely to go off without thinking things through
Xenophobic
Click to expand...

but you're voting for her for only one single reason..........the letter D, aren't you
 
tsuke said:
he says most people were happy. Theoretically since only 1/3rd asked for a refund and only 35/7000 complained to the ftc he would have a valid statement.
Click to expand...

Actually, I have heard him say "everyone was happy".
 
Jarod said:
Actually, I have heard him say "everyone was happy".
Click to expand...

Cite. I have never heard him claim that, Counselor.

Trump’s attorneys have created a website called 98percentapproval.com, which claims to provide “over 10,000 surveys from Trump University students demonstrating their overwhelming satisfaction with the program.”

The website states that “98% of Trump University students rated the program ‘excellent.’ ”

On Twitter, Trump says, “Trump University has a 98% approval rating.”

That includes surveys filled out by Kevin Scott and Bob Guillo, two men who each spent more than $30,000 to attend seminars offered by “Trump University” and who are featured in separate ads also paid for by the American Future Fund.

In the ads, Scott and Guillo voice their displeasure with having paid to take the classes and say that they were “scammed” by Trump and call him “a fraud.”



http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/trumps-defense-of-his-university/
 
Legion Troll said:
Cite. I have never heard him claim that, Counselor.

Trump’s attorneys have created a website called 98percentapproval.com, which claims to provide “over 10,000 surveys from Trump University students demonstrating their overwhelming satisfaction with the program.”

The website states that “98% of Trump University students rated the program ‘excellent.’ ”

On Twitter, Trump says, “Trump University has a 98% approval rating.”

That includes surveys filled out by Kevin Scott and Bob Guillo, two men who each spent more than $30,000 to attend seminars offered by “Trump University” and who are featured in separate ads also paid for by the American Future Fund.

In the ads, Scott and Guillo voice their displeasure with having paid to take the classes and say that they were “scammed” by Trump and call him “a fraud.”



http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/trumps-defense-of-his-university/
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you never heard it.
 
Jarod said:
Using Trump Logic... When he said his Judge was unfair, and the logic he used was that the Judge was "Mexican".

Can a white Judge rule on cases with Black litigants?
Click to expand...

You're missing the point. Trump made his comment because he thinks the judge might be biased in favor of illegal immigrants, so he would be biased against Trump because of Trump's idiotic wall pronouncement.
 
​




"He is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro-Mexican, which is all fine," Trump said on Face the Nation on June 5. "But I say, he's got bias. I want to build a wall."

Our interest is strictly in this club that Trump referenced. Is it actually "strongly pro-Mexican" as he said?

The group in question is the California La Raza Lawyers Association. It dates back to 1977. The group’s immediate past president, Joel Murillo, told us that it was formed in response to stereotyping coming from judges and lawyers.

"There were judges on the bench saying people with Spanish surnames were prone to be savages," Murillo said. "When we tried to integrate with the mainstream bar association, we were denied. We were marginalized. The only people who were willing to work with us were us."

Murillo says the days of stereotyping are over, and the group now focuses on the professional development of Latino lawyers and encouraging students to pursue a career in law. He called Trump’s description of the association as very strongly pro-Mexican a "misnomer." The group has not been involved in the immigration debate.

The group’s bylaws state, "The purpose and goal of this association is to promote the interests of the Latino communities throughout the state and the professional interests of the membership." That membership is now about half Latino, Murillo said, and in terms of party affiliation, "the lawyers who belong pretty much reflect the population."

The conservative website Redstate posted an op-ed rebuking Trump’s use of the California lawyers group as proof of Judge Curiel’s political motives. The writer, Leon Wolf, called the effort to disparage the association "dishonest."

"As far as I can tell, they appear to be a pretty garden variety special interest lawyers association," Wolf wrote. "Every state has these chapters for Hispanic lawyers, black lawyers, women lawyers, Mormon lawyers, Christian lawyers, Jewish lawyers -- you name it, there is a lawyer association for it in every state."

Trump said Curiel belonged to a group that is very strongly pro-Mexican.

We rate this assertion Mostly False.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/07/donald-trump/trump-wrongly-casts-california-lawyers-group-stron/
 
Seahawk said:
You're missing the point. Trump made his comment because he thinks the judge might be biased in favor of illegal immigrants, so he would be biased against Trump because of Trump's idiotic wall pronouncement.
Click to expand...

But a black litigant might think a white judge might be biased in favor of white supremacists, so he would be biased against the black because of the black persons skin color.
 
Jarod said:
But a black litigant might think a white judge might be biased in favor of white supremacists, so he would be biased against the black because of the black persons skin color.
Click to expand...

Not the same thing. Not even close. You're hysterical.
 
Jarod said:
But a black litigant might think a white judge might be biased in favor of white supremacists, so he would be biased against the black because of the black persons skin color.
Click to expand...

only if the white judge was a member of stormfront or kkk.
 
Legion Troll said:
​




"He is a member of a club or society, very strongly pro-Mexican, which is all fine," Trump said on Face the Nation on June 5. "But I say, he's got bias. I want to build a wall."

Our interest is strictly in this club that Trump referenced. Is it actually "strongly pro-Mexican" as he said?

The group in question is the California La Raza Lawyers Association. It dates back to 1977. The group’s immediate past president, Joel Murillo, told us that it was formed in response to stereotyping coming from judges and lawyers.

"There were judges on the bench saying people with Spanish surnames were prone to be savages," Murillo said. "When we tried to integrate with the mainstream bar association, we were denied. We were marginalized. The only people who were willing to work with us were us."

Murillo says the days of stereotyping are over, and the group now focuses on the professional development of Latino lawyers and encouraging students to pursue a career in law. He called Trump’s description of the association as very strongly pro-Mexican a "misnomer." The group has not been involved in the immigration debate.

The group’s bylaws state, "The purpose and goal of this association is to promote the interests of the Latino communities throughout the state and the professional interests of the membership." That membership is now about half Latino, Murillo said, and in terms of party affiliation, "the lawyers who belong pretty much reflect the population."

The conservative website Redstate posted an op-ed rebuking Trump’s use of the California lawyers group as proof of Judge Curiel’s political motives. The writer, Leon Wolf, called the effort to disparage the association "dishonest."

"As far as I can tell, they appear to be a pretty garden variety special interest lawyers association," Wolf wrote. "Every state has these chapters for Hispanic lawyers, black lawyers, women lawyers, Mormon lawyers, Christian lawyers, Jewish lawyers -- you name it, there is a lawyer association for it in every state."

Trump said Curiel belonged to a group that is very strongly pro-Mexican.

We rate this assertion Mostly False.


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/07/donald-trump/trump-wrongly-casts-california-lawyers-group-stron/
Click to expand...

did the group also give scholarships to illegal immigrants? :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top