Officer acquitted

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Officer acquitted on all charges in Freddie Gray case

A Baltimore officer was acquitted Monday of assault and other charges in the arrest of Freddie Gray, dealing prosecutors a significant blow in their attempt to hold police accountable for the young black man's death from injuries he suffered in the back of a police van.

A judge also found Officer Edward Nero not guilty of reckless endangerment and misconduct in office. As the verdict was read, Nero dropped his head down and his attorney placed a hand on his back. The courtroom was quiet. Nero stood up and hugged his attorney, and was visibly emotional.

The assault charge carried a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and reckless endangerment carried a punishment of up to five years.

Gray died April 19, 2015, a week after his neck was broken in the back of a police transport van while he was handcuffed and shackled but left unrestrained by a seat belt.

Nero was one of six officers charged in the case. He waived his right to a jury trial, opting instead to argue his case before Circuit Judge Barry Williams. A jury trial was held for Officer William Porter late last year, and the panel could not reach a decision on manslaughter and other charges.

Gray's death set off more than a week of protests followed by looting, rioting and arson that prompted a citywide curfew. His name became a rallying cry in the growing national conversation about the treatment of black men by police officers.

Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said in a statement that Nero will still face an administrative review by the police department. (Does anyone else see an appeasement under way?)

"We once again ask the citizens to be patient and to allow the entire process to come to a conclusion. In the case of any disturbance in the city, we are prepared to respond. We will protect our neighborhoods, our businesses and the people of our city," she said.

About a dozen protesters gathered outside the courthouse as the verdict was read.

Prosecutors said Nero unlawfully detained Gray and acted callously when he made a decision not to buckle Gray into a seat belt when he was loaded into the back of a transport vehicle.

Nero's attorney argued his client didn't arrest Gray and that it was the police van driver's responsibility to buckle in detainees. The defense also said the officers who responded that day acted responsibly, and called witnesses to bolster their argument that any reasonable officer in Nero's position would have made the same decisions.

The defense said the department's order requiring that all inmates be strapped in is more suggestion than rule because officers are expected to act with discretion based on the circumstances of each situation.

The other officers are set to each have separate trials over the summer and into the fall. Nero is white and Porter is black. Two of the other officers charged in the case are white and two are black.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberal melt down in:

3

2

1
 
The best part of this was the officer requested a bench trial, and was acquitted that way. Gave the retarded proles of Baltimore the finger, and basically told them all to go get an education.

That said, he's clearly an abusive cop and shares in the blame for what happened. Now he'll return to being a shitty law enforcement officer who loves his position of power too much.
 
The best part of this was the officer requested a bench trial, and was acquitted that way. Gave the retarded proles of Baltimore the finger, and basically told them all to go get an education.

That said, he's clearly an abusive cop and shares in the blame for what happened. Now he'll return to being a shitty law enforcement officer who loves his position of power too much.

Why do you think he's abusive?
 
hmm... aqcuitted by a judge of wrongdoing then now facing administrative punishment... I think they should just let him off if he has been acquitted no punishment at all.
 
hmm... aqcuitted by a judge of wrongdoing then now facing administrative punishment... I think they should just let him off if he has been acquitted no punishment at all.

The "administration" can't; because they have to appease the public, with a sacrificial lamb.
 
You mean, other than the fact that he used excessive force in this instance, and still faces disciplinary action for it? When did facts develop the ability to emote?

When was it ruled that he used "excessive force"; because he was just acquitted of all charges?
This "disciplinary action" that you refer to, is what you see when you read administrative review?

Are we now supposed to use your "facts" to speculate on crimes that Gray committed, PREVIOUSLY?
 
When was it ruled that he used "excessive force"; because he was just acquitted of all charges?
This "disciplinary action" that you refer to, is what you see when you read administrative review?

Are we now supposed to use your "facts" to speculate on crimes that Gray committed, PREVIOUSLY?

Judge ruled that the state didn't make its case (this is Baltimore, so the incompetence is to be expected). I think focusing on his future crimes will be sufficient, rather than living in the past.
 
Judge ruled that the state didn't make its case (this is Baltimore, so the incompetence is to be expected). I think focusing on his future crimes will be sufficient, rather than living in the past.


HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Now it's they didn't make their case, just like any other case where the defendant is acquitted.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, so those who are acquitted, are only done so through incompetence; when you don't agree with the findings.

You seem to be unable to support your conjecture, with facts and instead just want to voice your dissatisfaction that the outcome isn't the one you FEEL it should have been.

Gotcha - :good4u:
 
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Now it's they didn't make their case, just like any other case where the defendant is acquitted.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, so those who are acquitted, are only done so through incompetence; when you don't agree with the findings.

You seem to be unable to support your conjecture, with facts and instead just want to voice your dissatisfaction that the outcome isn't the one you FEEL it should have been.

Gotcha - :good4u:

I take it you did not read the judge's ruling, and are just spitballing, here?
 
Why do you think he's abusive?
Well he didn't seem overly concerned about Mr. Greys safety and well being. As a public safety official the officer may not have committed a crime. However he did have a professional responsibility for Mr. Greys safety, so from a civil standpoint he's not out of the woods yet.

The important thing is that due process has occurred and some politically motivated DA didn't undermine the rule of law.

Someone will be held accountable. A persons neck doesn't break by taking a leasurely ride downtown. Someone fucked up and Mr. Grey died as a result.
 
hmm... aqcuitted by a judge of wrongdoing then now facing administrative punishment... I think they should just let him off if he has been acquitted no punishment at all.
Yeah I mean what the hell. I mean some one died due to his negligence but it was only a nigger. It's not like a real white person died. Why should anyone be held accountable for accidentally killing someone, right.

Wow...you're bout right up there with Racist X there T-Suck, ain't ya?
 
Back
Top