Obama green energy project Abengoa files for bankruptcy

RockX

Banned
If you were wondering what the Spanish word for “Solyndra” is, this week provided the answer: “Abengoa.”


Abengoa is a Spanish company that was another of President Obama’s personally picked green energy projects, and it’s now on the verge of bankruptcy too, potentially saddling taxpayers with a multibillion-dollar tab and fueling the notion that the administration repeatedly gambles on losers in the energy sector.


The renewable energy firm, which is constructing several large-scale solar power projects in the U.S. and has received at least $2.7 billion in federal loan guarantees since 2010, said Wednesday it will begin insolvency proceedings, a technical first step toward a possible bankruptcy.


The news comes at an especially awkward time for Mr. Obama. On Sunday he’ll travel to Paris for a historic climate change summit and is expected to call on world leaders to reject fossil fuels and spend heavily on renewable energy, including solar power.


Abengoa
’s looming demise is eerily reminiscent of the fall of solar power firm Solyndra in 2011, a colossal failure of government investment that left taxpayers on the hook for more than $530 million.


A potential Abengoa bankruptcy could be much worse for taxpayers, although it’s unclear how much of the guaranteed loans the company has paid back. Neither the White House nor the Energy Department responded to requests for comment Wednesday seeking information on how much the company still owes on the loans, for which the federal government might be left on the hook.


Critics say Abengoa is yet another reminder that the administration’s meddling in the energy sector — and its insistence that, with enough government financial backing, ambitious renewable projects can compete in the free market — leads to disaster for taxpayers.


“When you have a company that is based on subsidies, it is no surprise they run into financial trouble because their business model isn’t based on economics; it’s based on politics,” said Daniel Simmons, vice president for policy at the conservative Institute for Energy Research, a leading critic of the administration’s spending on renewable fuels and of the president’s energy policy more broadly.


“The government money fueled Abengoa’s growth. They fueled their desire to take on more debt. It’s now obvious they have a very serious debt problem,” Mr. Simmons added. “What is troubling is that if there are large projects that private-sector people think they’ll be able to make money on, there’s no need to take those projects to a government. That’s where these projects go wrong: thinking governments will necessarily make good investment decisions.”

Wednesday’s news sent Abengoa’s stock price falling by about 60 percent. International banks’ total exposure to a full Abengoa bankruptcy stands at about $21.4 billion, according to Reuters news agency, meaning the company’s downfall would end up being the largest bankruptcy in Spanish history.


The announcement came after private Spanish backers said they were bailing on plans to pour hundreds of millions of dollars into the company.


Update: A federal judge agreed to extend the shield of U.S. bankruptcy law to Abengoa SA while the Spanish renewable energy company works to secure creditors’ support for a restructuring plan.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...reen-energy-project-on-verge-of-ban/?page=all


Another green energy failure...what a shock.
 
It's funny how some on the right are about alternatives. It's not an ideological issue. But some see it as a "liberal" cause, so knee-jerk against it whenever they can.

Many conservatives are advocates & supporters or renewable energy. It's cleaner, creates more jobs domestically and gets us off of foreign oil (and thus becomes a national security benefit). It's also the future, whether anyone likes the idea of that or not.
 
It's funny how some on the right are about alternatives. It's not an ideological issue. But some see it as a "liberal" cause, so knee-jerk against it whenever they can.

Many conservatives are advocates & supporters or renewable energy. It's cleaner, creates more jobs domestically and gets us off of foreign oil (and thus becomes a national security benefit). It's also the future, whether anyone likes the idea of that or not.

Frankly it is an ideological issue for some including you, I am sad to say.
 
It's funny how some on the right are about alternatives. It's not an ideological issue. But some see it as a "liberal" cause, so knee-jerk against it whenever they can.

Many conservatives are advocates & supporters or renewable energy. It's cleaner, creates more jobs domestically and gets us off of foreign oil (and thus becomes a national security benefit). It's also the future, whether anyone likes the idea of that or not.


Do you really think the reason we continue to buy foreign oil is economics?
 
It isn't the business of government to do this. But maybe you can find the clause in the US Constitution.

If a small investment in alternatives can get us off of foreign oil sooner & improve our national security as a result, I'm not sure why you'd be against it.

But have at it. Few or your positions make any logical sense, anyway.
 
If a small investment in alternatives can get us off of foreign oil sooner & improve our national security as a result, I'm not sure why you'd be against it.

But have at it. Few or your positions make any logical sense, anyway.

In other words, you can't find anything in the Constitution?
 
You mentioned that it would create jobs domestically. That's an economic issue.

Wow - seriously? Those are 2 completely separate concepts. The fact that alternatives would create jobs domestically doesn't mean our reliance on foreign oil is based on economics.

Methinks you're in a bit over your head.
 
Back
Top