The antisemitic UN

Poor moon the Jew hater has a new friend, right Jean

Isn't it marvellous to hear the jack-boot boys calling decent people 'Jew haters' because they oppose the Nazis occupying Palestine! Still, as Goebbels taught them, the bigger the lie the better!
 
Isn't it marvellous to hear the jack-boot boys calling decent people 'Jew haters' because they oppose the Nazis occupying Palestine! Still, as Goebbels taught them, the bigger the lie the better!

Thanks for pegging the irony-meter so early in the day. Strong work lol.
 
What about all the so called Palestinians who sold their land to Jews?

It's a myth- albeit a carefully-crafted and widely disseminated myth.

The ethnic cleansing of the poor is not uncommon - take the Highland Clearances of Scotland as just one example;
https://roddymacleod.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/perpetuating-some-myths-of-the-highland-clearances/

Zionists would have you believe that ordinary Palestinians simply exchanged their homes in Palestine for Zionist money. This is a lie.

The registration process itself was open to misregistration and manipulation. Land collectively owned by village residents ended up registered to one villager, and merchants and local Ottoman administrators took the opportunity to register large areas of land to their own name. The result was land that became the legal property of people who had never lived on the land, while the peasants, having lived there for generations, retained possession, but became tenants of absentee owners.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absentee_landlord#In_Palestine_before_1948

However, some Palestinians- for reasons of, greed, coercion or whatever- did sell their property, but to even start to believe that such transfers were enough to accomodate hundreds of thousands of European Zionists is absurd. To do so today is considered treason and is a capital crime under Palestinian law.
The Zionists' plan was always to ethnically cleanse Palestine of Palestinians. They razed hundreds of Palestinian villages prior to a unilateral declaration of statehood in 1948- and it was this brutality which brought the - ill-prepared- Arab League into the 1948 war,
 
They are not indigenous. They only arrived during the Arab conquests.

That's not what the DNA results say. You can continue denying reality all you want, but it's a fact that the Arabs left little genetic footprint on the areas they conquered, and most of the current inhabitants are in fact indigenous to the area. Arab Jews and Arab Palestinians are indistinguishable genetically. Ashkenzai Jews have the same Y-DNA as Palestinians, but European mitochondrial DNA (indicating that Jewish males left Palestine and married European mothers).
 
In general populations have not been that mobile, historically. Any theory that relies on "X conquered this area and totally eradicated/displaced Y" should be treated with extreme skepticism. The English are mostly descendants of Celts that were Germanized. The Turks are mostly the descendants of Anatolian Greeks that were Turkified. The Moors were mostly the descendants of indigenous Iberians who were Arabized. And the Palestinians are mostly the descendants of Jews who were Arabized.

The main exceptions came with the advent of settler colonialism during the age of European imperialism.
 
Last edited:
That's not what the DNA results say. You can continue denying reality all you want, but it's a fact that the Arabs left little genetic footprint on the areas they conquered, and most of the current inhabitants are in fact indigenous to the area. Arab Jews and Arab Palestinians are indistinguishable genetically. Ashkenzai Jews have the same Y-DNA as Palestinians, but European mitochondrial DNA (indicating that Jewish males left Palestine and married European mothers).

Where do you come up with this horseshit, a cereal box? Show definitive, mainstream links, or fuck off.
 
The westerners always believe that they have unanimous support among the native populace when they launch their imperialist projects, they are always proven incorrect. Tibet is a Chinese province, not a single nation in the entire world disputes this fact. And try saying that Chinese territory should be broken off and given to some western client state in front of a Chinese person... that will be the end of your life.



The Arab states were just practicing self-defense against Israeli aggression. Israel has no right but right of conquest, that might makes right, and that can be just as easily lost as it can be gained.



Palestinians have levant DNA, the same kind of Y-Chromosomes that Jews do. Your theory falls flat on its face considering that. They're indigenous to the area.
Tibet is a separate nation and culture. The fact no country disputes that goes to the effectiveness of Chinese hegemony -
not any world based facts.
The dalai lama is ( perhaps) not choosing to reincarnate because of the enslavement of Tibet.
So China destroys the dalai Lama /Tibetan Buddhism/and rapes a culture all without a whimper from the world.

Chinese "might makes right"..sad to say much the same happens to the Palestinians by the Israelis. right of conquest.
Of course the Palestinians are pawns of the Arab states, and do not help their cause with the Hamas and such
 
Tibet is a separate nation and culture.

Scotland is a separate nation and culture. So what? Does anyone dispute that Scotland is part of the United Kingdom?

China is a multi-ethnic country. India is too. The fact that there are separate cultures there should be surprising to no one, and shouldn't give cause to carve the country up. Westerners just want to carve China up and weaken it because they're scared of China.
 
Tibet is a separate nation and culture. The fact no country disputes that goes to the effectiveness of Chinese hegemony -
not any world based facts.


The problem with Tibet's claim to statehood is that it failed to present itself as a state during- and shortly after- the creation of the United Nations. In effect, China was not, technically, infringing upon its United Nations Charter obligations by occupying Tibet.
It has a moral claim, certainly, and its resistance to Chinese rule will- no doubt- continue indefinitely.
 
Tibet was just one of a series of warlord states that emerged after the fall of the Chinese central government in the 1910's. All warlords were eventually brought under heel and China was reunified, aside from Taiwan and Hong Kong/Macau.
 

You keep lying, and we'll keep correcting them:

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/dna-links-prove-jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664

"Jews, he notes, are one of the most distinctive population groups in the world because of our history of endogamy. Jews — Ashkenazim in particular — are relatively homogeneous despite the fact that they are spread throughout Europe and have since immigrated to the Americas and back to Israel. The Inquisition shattered Sephardi Jewry, leading to far more incidences of intermarriage and to a less distinctive DNA."

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/.premium-1.626156

"The overwhelming majority of Jews living today should be able to trace their roots back to the Middle East with a little DNA testing, he maintains, and all those who claim otherwise, as far as he’s concerned, have their history wrong.
“We’re not interlopers who came here from Eastern Europe, and we’re not Serbs or Kazars,” says Greenspan. “You can use whatever polemic you want to discredit the Jews or discredit the nation, but saying that we weren’t here is a lie.”
 
Palestine has been recognised as a discreet state by the United Nations and has the support for its borders on the pre-1967 lines by the overwhelming majority of United Nations member states. Israel has no claim whatsoever to occupied Palestinian territory and should withdraw immediately according to the requirements of international law. Thus speaks modern law and that's where the clout is.
Zionists, go home.
 
Scotland is a separate nation and culture. So what? Does anyone dispute that Scotland is part of the United Kingdom?

China is a multi-ethnic country. India is too. The fact that there are separate cultures there should be surprising to no one, and shouldn't give cause to carve the country up. Westerners just want to carve China up and weaken it because they're scared of China.
My interest isn't "western", it's the hostile destruction of Tibet as self governing, independent culture.
It's own language, it's own ethnicity, it's own autonomy before 1951.

It was a hostile take over, and the Han Chinese to this day enslave Tibet, unlike Scotland.
The Tibetan Uprising of 1959
China Forces the Dalai Lama into Exile
http://asianhistory.about.com/od/colonialisminasia/a/1959tibetupr.htm

In 1951, Mao's gaze turned west. He decided to "liberate" Tibet from the Dalai Lama's rule and bring it into the People's Republic of China. The PLA crushed Tibet's tiny armed forces in a matter of weeks; Beijing then imposed the Seventeen Point Agreement, which Tibetan officials were forced to sign (but later renounced).
 
Tibet was just one of a series of warlord states that emerged after the fall of the Chinese central government in the 1910's. All warlords were eventually brought under heel and China was reunified, aside from Taiwan and Hong Kong/Macau.
Tibet has a long history of being under the Chinese boot. Differing relations with the Chinese dynasties -sometime allied - but separate states..

Tibet and China: History of a Complex Relationship

Self-immolation protests by Tibetans in China

According to Reuters the Dalai Lama, spiritual leader of Tibet, said in March 2012 he does not encourage the protests, but he has praised the courage of those who had engaged in self-immolation and blamed the self-immolations on "cultural genocide" by the Chinese
 
Last edited:
My interest isn't "western", it's the hostile destruction of Tibet as self governing, independent culture.
It's own language, it's own ethnicity, it's own autonomy before 1951.

It was a hostile take over, and the Han Chinese to this day enslave Tibet, unlike Scotland.
The Tibetan Uprising of 1959
China Forces the Dalai Lama into Exile
http://asianhistory.about.com/od/colonialisminasia/a/1959tibetupr.htm

In 1951, Mao's gaze turned west. He decided to "liberate" Tibet from the Dalai Lama's rule and bring it into the People's Republic of China. The PLA crushed Tibet's tiny armed forces in a matter of weeks; Beijing then imposed the Seventeen Point Agreement, which Tibetan officials were forced to sign (but later renounced).

Isn't it interesting how the leftist cunts pick and choose whose self-determination and sovereignty they will support?

The fakestinians could murder every child on earth under 3, and these far left turds will screech how it is justified...but but but the Tibetans, Kurds and others - well, according to the far left trash, those peoples aren't really deserving of sovereignty...

It seems the far left has their pecking order, and since the left is fundamentally anti-Western/anti-American no one is allowed criticise china, russia or iran, no matter how awful their behavior is.
 
Isn't it interesting how the leftist cunts pick and choose whose self-determination and sovereignty they will support?

The fakestinians could murder every child on earth under 3, and these far left turds will screech how it is justified...but but but the Tibetans, Kurds and others - well, according to the far left trash, those peoples aren't really deserving of sovereignty...

It seems the far left has their pecking order, and since the left is fundamentally anti-Western/anti-American no one is allowed criticise china, russia or iran, no matter how awful their behavior is.
at one time "Free Tibet" was a liberal ( humanitarian, etc.) cause..
I find westerners standing up for china's great human rights abuses ( across the board) to be silly affectations
 
Back
Top