Rubio - no exceptions for rape & incest?

C

Cancel 2020.1

Canceled
I don't really care how pro-life you are. That's inhumane, and completely out of touch.

I hope NH can change the course of this campaign. Doesn't look like it, though. The 3 GOP frontrunners are all incredibly flawed candidates.
 
absolutely. more didactic politics. women must carry to birth! Abortion in ALL CASES IS EVIL !! :eek:

right wing lunatics are the same as left wing nut cases.
 
Some people want to tag Rubio with this establishment/RINO label but he's a pretty conservative dude.
 
Rubio, Cruz, and even Trump are so much less flawed than Hillary, it's immeasurable.

Rubio is entitled to believe all innocent life is valuable- that's hardly amoral. Incest is abominable. But to proclaim abortion as right is worse. It's sadistic and mosrterous.
 
cawacko said:
Some people want to tag Rubio with this establishment/RINO label but he's a pretty conservative dude.
Click to expand...

I had heard this, but was enjoying watching him in the debates. He seems like a really bright guy...very articulate.

The no exception stance is pretty far right, for sure. I'm not usually a one issue voter, but that really says something about him.
 
J Craft said:
Rubio, Cruz, and even Trump are so much less flawed than Hillary, it's immeasurable.

Rubio is entitled to believe all innocent life is valuable- that's hardly amoral. Incest is abominable. But to proclaim abortion as right is worse. It's sadistic and mosrterous.
Click to expand...
so you would impose your moral code ( which is what that is) on those that disagree,
and the fact SCOTUS recognizes this a right to privacy ( from government intervention) means nothing?
 
Thing1 said:
I had heard this, but was enjoying watching him in the debates. He seems like a really bright guy...very articulate.

The no exception stance is pretty far right, for sure. I'm not usually a one issue voter, but that really says something about him.
Click to expand...


What difference does it make.....abortion is legal and has been for decades....no matter what his personal feelings are....

Not a one issue voter?.....abortion isn't even an issue, and being it up is nothing but a distraction.....not unlike derailing a thread because you're you're losing....

The SCOTUS has ruled abortion a right.....that dog is dead......
 
NOVA said:
What difference does it make.....abortion is legal and has been for decades....no matter what his personal feelings are....

Not a one issue voter?.....abortion isn't even an issue, and being it up is nothing but a distraction.....not unlike derailing a thread because you're you're losing....
Click to expand...

It's not like he would have no influence as President on what happens with abortion rights. Please.

And such a draconian & absolute view on human rights & humanity in general really speaks to what kind of person he is. I don't want someone like that leading the country.
 
anatta said:
so you would impose your moral code ( which is what that is) on those that disagree,
and the fact SCOTUS recognizes this a right to privacy ( from government intervention) means nothing?
Click to expand...

How did you arrive at those conclusions from his post......???

Understand what he says, not what you think he says.....
 
anatta said:
so you would impose your moral code ( which is what that is) on those that disagree,
and the fact SCOTUS recognizes this a right to privacy ( from government intervention) means nothing?
Click to expand...

I can't impose shit due to a law that allows the free fall slaughter of humans at the most vulnerable stage of development.
 
Thing1 said:
It's not like he would have no influence as President on what happens with abortion rights. Please.

And such a draconian & absolute view on human rights & humanity in general really speaks to what kind of person he is. I don't want someone like that leading the country.
Click to expand...

Its been proclaimed a right and he can't change that, with any more luck that the Obama has had with infringing on your 1st or 2nd Amendment rights.....

and Rubio has not even mentioned that subject as a reason to support him...not brought up in debates, etc....its only mentioned by those that know

these wedge issues work for Democrats....

If you think his view is draconian & absolute , WTF is the left's view on the same subject but exactly just as draconian & absolute.
 
Out of curiosity I wonder if polling has been done among those who are pro life to see what percentage would be ok with exceptions for rape and incest.
 
cawacko said:
Out of curiosity I wonder if polling has been done among those who are pro life to see what percentage would be ok with exceptions for rape and incest.
Click to expand...

I think since rape and incest account for % of abortions- I'd be OK with those exceptions as a starting point. But Rubio's convictions of conscience are no different than Reagan, Bush and numerous others- the red herring wedge issue is tired and old. Rubio can, and would, be able to fulfill his role as president and still uphold the law.
 
J Craft said:
I think since rape and incest account for % of abortions- I'd be OK with those exceptions as a starting point. But Rubio's convictions of conscience are no different than Reagan, Bush and numerous others- the red herring wedge issue is tired and old. Rubio can, and would, be able to fulfill his role as president and still uphold the law.
Click to expand...

It's more a political issue rather than Rubio being able to do the job. The reality is a number of people on both the right and left vote the way they do because of abortion. So each side of course tries to paint the other as being out of touch with what the public wants.
 
anatta said:
sure, if I misunderstood, i'll take the correction.
Click to expand...

You say, "so you would impose your moral code ( which is what that is) on those that disagree,
and the fact SCOTUS recognizes this a right to privacy ( from government intervention) means nothing?"

Unless I didn't understand him, he didn't say would impose his moral code and anyone....

The he states his opinion on abortion,....again not saying the SCOTUS meant nothing....

I'm not trying to correct you, so

Thats why I posed the question to you......how did YOU arrive at those conclusions.....maybe its me that missed some previous post of his ????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top