Clinton Accused Again of Handling Top Secret Info Via Private Email

these are not new Emails ( to my knowledge) the letter from the Intelligence Community IG is new.
From what I know the classification laws/protocols are fairly restrictive; but getting an indictment is not - it's difficult
to prove intent. There is one category that doesn't need intent..I wish I could recall it, I think maybe the "born classified" stuff.

I seriously despise Clinton for being chief architect/swaying of policy from "NoFly" to Interventionism = destruction of Libya to a failed terrorist state.
You can see my blog Libyan Civil War 2014 - Present
which also has some coverage in there of Clinton's role ( along with minor parties like Rice and Powers) in the fiasco of the 2011Civil war.

Anyways..That and her defending her "smart power" rationalizations even today make her truly unfit for Command.
I'd much rather see Sanders win, even though he doesn't really get how to lead -at least he's not a neo-con like Clinton is.

The Emails show a lot about her arrogance of power, oth her handling of the 'scandal' ,and her setting up the server to begin with
 
Hillary used her email account as RECOMMENDED by the State Department and transferred NO material that was classified AT THAT TIME. NO ONE is alleging any differently at this point. Cream your jeans, pukes.

You're not only stupid and gullible, you're gullible and stupid too.....its her job to KNOW when what information is secret and confidential, it shouldn't have to be spelled out for her....

Any personal email account should have been used for personal communications and NOT for gov. State Dept. business that in effect bypasses gov. scrutiny and security...
 
Last edited:
these are not new Emails ( to my knowledge) the letter from the Intelligence Community IG is new.
From what I know the classification laws/protocols are fairly restrictive; but getting an indictment is not - it's difficult
to prove intent. There is one category that doesn't need intent..I wish I could recall it, I think maybe the "born classified" stuff.

I seriously despise Clinton for being chief architect/swaying of policy from "NoFly" to Interventionism = destruction of Libya to a failed terrorist state.
You can see my blog Libyan Civil War 2014 - Present
which also has some coverage in there of Clinton's role ( along with minor parties like Rice and Powers) in the fiasco of the 2011Civil war.

Anyways..That and her defending her "smart power" rationalizations even today make her truly unfit for Command.
I'd much rather see Sanders win, even though he doesn't really get how to lead -at least he's not a neo-con like Clinton is.

The Emails show a lot about her arrogance of power, oth her handling of the 'scandal' ,and her setting up the server to begin with

What intent did they show for General Petraues?

Did he do a coverup ?
 
What intent did they show for General Petraues?

Did he do a coverup ?

he did intentionally show classified documents to his biographer - g/f. a cover up? I don't think so.
I heard mention Sec of Defense Ash Carter is now looking to strip him of rank/pension. which would be awful.
 
he did intentionally show classified documents to his biographer - g/f. a cover up? I don't think so.
I heard mention Sec of Defense Ash Carter is now looking to strip him of rank/pension. which would be awful.


and Hillary intentionally send classified emails over her unsecured server....

whether they were marked classified or not is irrelevant...a Sec. of State is supposed to KNOW what is and isn't information that is sensitive in nature and err on the side of cautiousness
and security....even her lawyer is now in possession of sensitive emails that he should not be privy to....agree ?
 
and Hillary intentionally send classified emails over her unsecured server....

whether they were marked classified or not is irrelevant...a Sec. of State is supposed to KNOW what is and isn't information that is sensitive in nature and err on the side of cautiousness
and security....even her lawyer is now in possession of sensitive emails that he should not be privy to....agree ?
without a doubt Clinton was reckless -marked classified or not she shouldn't have set it up since she had no other State dept account to use -
classified was bound to transverse her server
 
RacistX is a disgusting racist.Everything he says are the words of a racist swine.
Think for a moment, do you really want to defend him?


That was not a rhetorical question patriot. Do you?

Everybody here knows that, you are not telling us anything new!! However what the fuck does that have to do with Hillary Clinton and her private server? Can you answer that Leoni?
 
Everybody here knows that, you are not telling us anything new!! However what the fuck does that have to do with Hillary Clinton and her private server? Can you answer that Leoni?

I am compelled to identify swine . Even when they are pretending to be humans.
Perhaps you are capable of conversing with swine as though they were human, I will not.
 
Yea and she'll be accused of that again and again and again, probably even through her second term. Some people never give up. :rolleyes:

Funny, how some people give Cosby the benefit of the doubt but not Hillary. Hillary is guilty, and yet, she has not been tried. I think everyone can be a little hypocritical depending on the subject matter.
 
Funny, how some people give Cosby the benefit of the doubt but not Hillary. Hillary is guilty, and yet, she has not been tried. I think everyone can be a little hypocritical depending on the subject matter.

It seems to me that according to most sources, the FBI have plenty to at least indict Hillary, will Obama's puppet lynch pull the trigger,? probably not. Which then presents the question how will the FBI react to being told they are irrelevant.
 
Back
Top