Muslim filth commit mass rapes in Germany - no surprise there

transwarpdrive

Destroyer of Liberals
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/w...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

"Germany took in more than one million migrants last year, and with the country struggling to deal with the political, social and wider consequences of the influx, the delayed public response has led to concerns that the authorities were playing down the seriousness of the assault to prevent it from becoming a point of contention in the broader debate."

========================================

The only disappointing element to this story is that Merkel the bastard was not one of the victims, THEN there would have been sweet justice applied to this story. Though perhaps I should just be patient, as it will eventually happen, perhaps in 10-20 years.

I hope the German authorities are happy about their decision to let in the shit of humanity into their once great, beautiful country. As history could have told them had they looked, allowing muslims into a country is akin to signing its own death warrant.
 
Little honesty problem there Zipperhead?
The article relates one(1) alleged rape.
When one needs to lie to make a point one doesn't have much of a point.
 
Little honesty problem there Zipperhead?
The article relates one(1) alleged rape.
When one needs to lie to make a point one doesn't have much of a point.

Are you retarded, or just incapable of reading?

"The police in Hamburg also said that 10 women had reported being sexually assaulted and robbed in a similar fashion on the same night, and they urged witnesses to come forward."
 
Are you retarded, or just incapable of reading?

"The police in Hamburg also said that 10 women had reported being sexually assaulted and robbed in a similar fashion on the same night, and they urged witnesses to come forward."

Yes.
Groping is not rape.
There was one alleged rape.
There us no evidence that even the alleged rapist was an Arab or an African but do carry on.

By the way you are far and beyond the biggest retard on this board.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/w...lumn-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

"Germany took in more than one million migrants last year, and with the country struggling to deal with the political, social and wider consequences of the influx, the delayed public response has led to concerns that the authorities were playing down the seriousness of the assault to prevent it from becoming a point of contention in the broader debate."

========================================

The only disappointing element to this story is that Merkel the bastard was not one of the victims, THEN there would have been sweet justice applied to this story. Though perhaps I should just be patient, as it will eventually happen, perhaps in 10-20 years.

I hope the German authorities are happy about their decision to let in the shit of humanity into their once great, beautiful country. As history could have told them had they looked, allowing muslims into a country is akin to signing its own death warrant.

So where can I read about the "mass rapes" you mention in your headline?

You've sure as hell got NOTHING at the link you provide.
 
Yes.
Groping is not rape.
There was one alleged rape.
There us no evidence that even the alleged rapist was an Arab or an African but do carry on.

By the way you are far and beyond the biggest retard on this board.

How bout that?

Turns out the OP is just more of the same hyperbolic bullshit Righties love to post.
 
Yes.Groping is not rape.There was one alleged rape.

Idiot, they said SEXUAL ASSAULT - they did NOT say what TYPE. You're so committed to trying to score points that you are making yourself look like a fucking moron.

There us no evidence that even the alleged rapist was an Arab or an African but do carry on.

No evidence other than all of the eyewitnesses who have come forward so far. Angry that arab muslims/africans are responsible? Looks like we have a leftist turd with an agenda here.

By the way you are far and beyond the biggest retard on this board.

No one, no where, comes close to you douchebag. You're just angry because I have this infuriating habit of humiliating and crushing weak leftists like you - and you cannot do anything about it. How sad for you.
 
Love what lengths liberals go to to defend muslimes. It must because they are natural political allies

They defend them for ideological reasons and it makes them strange bedfellows. The OP is a perfect example of it. A large group of Arab looking men grope and/or rape a bunch of German women. So where's the feminist outrage? Imagine, if a bunch of white frat boys were to do such a thing.

But since it involves Muslims the outrage is held in check by the devotion to their multicultural fantasies. Islam is just another religion and all religions are equal just like all cultures are equal. If anything, Islam is superior to Christianity and/or has been oppressed by it via western imperialism.

There's always a pecking order in liberalism insofar as some groups hold more sway than others. In this instance, Muslims trump women.

Once you figure it out, it makes perfect sense.
 
http://www.politico.eu/article/merkel-demands-firm-response-to-mass-attacks-women-scandal-cologne/

Even the Politico is calling it a 'mass attack' on women.

Aren't liberals against that sort of thing?

You have to understand the far left dung has a pecking order, a hierarchy of sorts, where they will protect their pet permanent victims to the death - until one of their more favored "victims" is involved:

from least important to most: white males, white females, latino males, latino females, black males, black females, children of any race, animals, gay people, non-arab muslim males, non-arab muslim females, arab muslim males, arab muslim females, arab muslims near Israel (sometimes incorrectly called "palestinians") of any gender.

If there are two "victims" involved in a situation, then the liberal manual requires them to refer back to my list so they can determine who to pander to the most. This is why the white females sexually assaulted are not as highly defended as the arab muslim male perpetrators, as the latter is more of a core "victim" block of the liberal agenda than the white women.

It is based on a similar design to the operating procedures of the democratic party; pander to the most dependent constituency most likely to vote for you, regardless of how hypocritical it makes you look, or what it does to the rest of the country - only votes, or potential future votes, matter.
 
Last edited:
They defend them for ideological reasons and it makes them strange bedfellows. The OP is a perfect example of it. A large group of Arab looking men grope and/or rape a bunch of German women. So where's the feminist outrage? Imagine, if a bunch of white frat boys were to do such a thing.

But since it involves Muslims the outrage is held in check by the devotion to their multicultural fantasies. Islam is just another religion and all religions are equal just like all cultures are equal. If anything, Islam is superior to Christianity and/or has been oppressed by it via western imperialism.

There's always a pecking order in liberalism insofar as some groups hold more sway than others. In this instance, Muslims trump women.

Once you figure it out, it makes perfect sense.
Yawn
 
They defend them for ideological reasons and it makes them strange bedfellows. The OP is a perfect example of it. A large group of Arab looking men grope and/or rape a bunch of German women. So where's the feminist outrage? Imagine, if a bunch of white frat boys were to do such a thing.

But since it involves Muslims the outrage is held in check by the devotion to their multicultural fantasies. Islam is just another religion and all religions are equal just like all cultures are equal. If anything, Islam is superior to Christianity and/or has been oppressed by it via western imperialism.

There's always a pecking order in liberalism insofar as some groups hold more sway than others. In this instance, Muslims trump women.

Once you figure it out, it makes perfect sense.

That's just so ridiculous. What do you think American feminists can do about what happens thousands of miles away? We can criticize it on social media, that's about it.

Furthermore, why make it a feminist thing? How about you men stepping up for a change, and talk about culture and boorishness instead of religion for a change? I don't recall religion being mentioned during the Tailhook scandal, for example.

"The Tailhook scandal was a series of incidents where more than 100 U.S. Navy and United States Marine Corps aviation officers were alleged to have sexually assaulted 83 women and 7 men, or otherwise engaged in "improper and indecent" conduct at the Las Vegas Hilton in Las Vegas, Nevada.[SUP][1]"[/SUP]
 
They defend them for ideological reasons and it makes them strange bedfellows. The OP is a perfect example of it. A large group of Arab looking men grope and/or rape a bunch of German women. So where's the feminist outrage? Imagine, if a bunch of white frat boys were to do such a thing.

But since it involves Muslims the outrage is held in check by the devotion to their multicultural fantasies. Islam is just another religion and all religions are equal just like all cultures are equal. If anything, Islam is superior to Christianity and/or has been oppressed by it via western imperialism.

There's always a pecking order in liberalism insofar as some groups hold more sway than others. In this instance, Muslims trump women.

Once you figure it out, it makes perfect sense.

Excellent post, very good. As I mentioned, it is all built around the identity politics structure initiated by the national democratic party starting with public employee unions in the late 1950s, then passing the 1965 Immigration Act which switched from importing primarily white immigrants from northern europe to brown ones from central/south america and africa that would be a) more likely to seek handouts from the government b) more likely to vote democratic to obtain ever more handouts.

You see, the democrats realized in the 1950s/60s that white people were no longer voting for them, and were never going to vote for them, as long as they kept trying to keep themselves in control and power via large goverment programs ("Great Society"), so they began importing large numbers of people from central/south america and other poor areas who would eventually be granted citizenship/amnesty and would vote democratic.

This fucking over of the US has been going on by the democratic party for over 50 years, and the dems couldn't care less if it eventually destroys the nation - as long as they are in power and control of the levers that will feed and support the masses of poor people they have brought into the country. Its the best of both worlds for the dems; they acquire people more likely to vote for them - and the rest of us have to pay the bill for these masses of poor from the 3rd world, dumped on the US by corrupt dictatorships who prefer smaller populations of mass poor who might foment a revolution and get them out of power. The real tragedy is that the news media has protected the democrats during this lunatic, diseased campaign to destroy the US, all the way up through today as seen by the sickening coddling of obama by the NY Times on a daily basis.
 
Last edited:
That's just so ridiculous. What do you think American feminists can do about what happens thousands of miles away? We can criticize it on social media, that's about it.

Those feminists you are defending have no compunction criticising Israel about the slightest activity against women.

Furthermore, why make it a feminist thing? How about you men stepping up for a change, and talk about culture and boorishness instead of religion for a change? I don't recall religion being mentioned during the Tailhook scandal, for example.

Because christian men do not treat women like garbage in their societies the way muslim men do. The rights of females in christian-majority are infinitely greater than in muslim ones, which no one should need to point out at this point.
 
Idiot, they said SEXUAL ASSAULT - they did NOT say what TYPE. You're so committed to trying to score points that you are making yourself look like a fucking moron.



No evidence other than all of the eyewitnesses who have come forward so far. Angry that arab muslims/africans are responsible? Looks like we have a leftist turd with an agenda here.



No one, no where, comes close to you douchebag. You're just angry because I have this infuriating habit of humiliating and crushing weak leftists like you - and you cannot do anything about it. How sad for you.

Read your own article dipshit.
I did.

One alleged rape.
Not even close to your headline.
You are a poor liar and too stupid for school.
 
Read your own article...

Typical liberal trash, following the script to a T.

No comment on the massive groups of muslims attacking large numbers of women - that would be a violation of the ever important Liberal Hierarchy of Victimhood I listed above - just lots of deflections, insults and nonsense to get people off of their focus on the cancerous, diseased, vile nature of muslims and the death cult called "islam."
 
National Sexual Violence Resource Center

Sexual violence in the U.S.

One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped
at some point in their lives (a)

46.4% lesbians, 74.9% bisexual women and 43.3%
heterosexual women reported sexual violence other
than rape during their lifetimes, while 40.2% gay
men, 47.4% bisexual men and 20.8% heterosexual
men reported sexual violence other than rape during
their lifetimes. (p)

Nearly one in 10 women has been raped by an
intimate partner in her lifetime, including completed
forced penetration, attempted forced penetration
or alcohol/drug-facilitated completed penetration.
Approximately one in 45 men has been made to
penetrate an intimate partner during his lifetime. (b)

91% of the victims of rape and sexual assault are
female, and 9% are male (o)

In eight out of 10 cases of rape, the victim knew the
person who sexually assaulted them (l)

8% of rapes occur while the victim is at work (e)

http://www.nsvrc.org/sites/default/...packet_statistics-about-sexual-violence_0.pdf
 
I should add that the liberal assholes who are focusing on BS instead of the heinousness committed by these muslims is particularly disgusting, and any women who are members here should be especially angry.

Whether these women were penetrated by a male penis or simply had their body parts groped and fondled makes no difference, both are unacceptable and criminal acts. I call out every female member of this board to step up and tell the liberal jackasses that they are not playthings for the arab muslims to touch when they want to, and to make a stand that their rights not to be assaulted are just as important as the rights afforded to the muslims by the far leftists.

Any women with the courage to step up here?
 
Back
Top