I feel you. Someone happy a business is making money, total douche. Freaking unbelievable.
Pfizer is a great American company, Obama plays the scounderal
- Thread starter kaz
- Start date
I feel you. Someone happy a business is making money, total douche. Freaking unbelievable.
Yes, agreed. Trump may know how to make money in capitalism, but he doesn't understand free markets themselves other than how to leverage them
Even parasites know where their next meal comes from
When Burger King moved it's corporate headquarters to Canada, to avoid paying US taxes, I stop eating there too! You can show your patriotism, by boycotting Burger King and Pfizer products too! One of the reasons this country is in the shape it's in, is because corporations and the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes!
So you kick them in the balls when they are here and kick them in the balls when they leave, and you don't get it, huh.
And that US corporations are moving to SOCIALIST countries doesn't make you blink in questioning your own policies at all. Typical, sad.
You're the problem, you and the other leftist parasites
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
I'm not a corporatist douchebag, I'm a corporate douchebag. I own a company and I do management consulting. My career was in management, mostly GE, and management strategy consulting in a variety of companies including Booz Allen. Then entrepreneurial. So I don't love companies, I am one of them.
So enough about me. What about you? What happened in your life that made you a loser that you hate freedom and want to be a ward of the State?
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
ChoppedLiver
New member
Internet cock sucker^^^
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Awwwwww Princess is angry and can't find suitable words
...falling into default mode of sophomoric sexual insults...
I'm so sad for you princess,,,Lol
Merry Christmas Princess
Last edited:
ChoppedLiver
New member
Awwwwwwwwww!
Did the little BOY not get its Christmas light put up on your 1958 single wide that's parked in a muddy farmers field (that you rent) and are all butt-hurt and jealous that people, who have done and will continue to do better than your lame and sorry ass will ever do, have much nicer Christmas lights on their house (that's a better house than you can ever imagine to get [rent])?
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Princess, you should lay off the eggnog...You are beginning to hallucinate...
ChoppedLiver
New member
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Princess is angry and decerebrate.
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
If Pfizer had such a cushy deal HERE dodging taxes and doing satan's bidding, why did they feel the need to go offshore? And just think what this means for all those "patriotic" pharmaceuticals that are going to rush in and fill the vacuum!!!...oh wait, never mind.
If one wants or needs an excuse for doing anything, simple look into your head and there it is. Look around in the there and you will find taxes and profits and unfairness and markets and shareholders and government. Put them together while strolling through Walmart after parking your foreign car next to another foreign car. Pick up a made in China product check the price and smile. Now checkout and pass by the Salvation Army kettle, thinking, wondering, if you need gas imported from somewhere, maybe Canada in your Mexican made car. Turn on your China made radio and smile as the spokesperson berates our president for using the word unpatriotic. 'This is America Obama, you say to yourself, we are a free capitalist society and you'll just never understand being a communist. Happy now, you proceed home, Rush's words filling your mind.....
"Kristol was trying to detach conservatism from its schizophrenic devotion to free markets on the one hand and tradition on the other. He knew that you can't revere tradition if you admire the "creative destruction" that capitalism brings to life. He knew that you can't insulate the nuclear family from the heartless logic of the market if you accept the dictates of free enterprise. He knew that conservatism had to become more liberal if it were to sound like something more than hidebound devotion to a phantom past. A "combination of the reforming spirit with the conservative ideal," he declared, "is most desperately wanted," and cited Herbert Croly, the original big government liberal from the Progressive Era, as his source of inspiration.
Kristol also knew that the competitive, entrepreneurial economy Friedman and Hayek posited as the source of freedom was a mere fantasy. Capitalism had long since become a system in which large corporations, not small producers, dominated the market - those anonymous and unknowable laws of supply and demand which once made all producers equally subject to the discipline of market forces had been supplanted by the visible hand of modern management: "There is little doubt that the idea of a (free market,' in the era of large corporations, is not quite the original capitalist idea." Some producers had more market power than, others: some persons (and this is how corporations are legally designated) were more equal than others. So everyone was not "free to choose," as Friedman would have it, simply because he or she inhabited a market society. Corporate capitalism remained a moral problem. For in "its concentration of assets and power-power to make economic decisions affecting the lives of tens of thousands of citizens - it seems to create a dangerous disharmony between the economic system and the political." P11 'The World Turned Inside Out' James Livingston
"Capitalism is the ownership and use of the concrete but dynamic elements in a society - what is commonly known as the means of production. A capitalist is someone who produces more capital through the production of the means he owns. This necessitates the periodic reinvestment of part of the capital earned into the repair, modernization and expansion of the means. Capitalism is therefore the ownership of an abstraction called capital, rendered concrete by its ownership of the means of production, which through actual production creates new capital.... However, capitalism as conceived today tends to revolve around something called the profit motive, even though profit is neither a cause of capitalism nor at the heart of the capitalist action. Profit is a useful result of the process, nothing more. As for the ownership of the means of production, this has been superseded by their management. And yet, to manage is to administer, which is a bureaucratic function. Alternately, there is a growing reliance upon the use of capital itself to produce new capital. But that is speculation, not production. Much of the development of the means of production is now rejected as unprofitable and, frankly, beneath the dignity of the modern manager, who would rather leave such labour and factory-intensive "dirty" work to Third World societies. Finally , the contemporary idea of capitalism grandly presents "service" as its new sophisticated manifestation. But the selling of one's own skills is not a capitalist art. And most of the jobs being created by the service industries are with the exception of the high-technology sector descendants of the pre-eighteenth-century commerce in trade and services." p360 'Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West' John Ralston Saul
"Kristol was trying to detach conservatism from its schizophrenic devotion to free markets on the one hand and tradition on the other. He knew that you can't revere tradition if you admire the "creative destruction" that capitalism brings to life. He knew that you can't insulate the nuclear family from the heartless logic of the market if you accept the dictates of free enterprise. He knew that conservatism had to become more liberal if it were to sound like something more than hidebound devotion to a phantom past. A "combination of the reforming spirit with the conservative ideal," he declared, "is most desperately wanted," and cited Herbert Croly, the original big government liberal from the Progressive Era, as his source of inspiration.
Kristol also knew that the competitive, entrepreneurial economy Friedman and Hayek posited as the source of freedom was a mere fantasy. Capitalism had long since become a system in which large corporations, not small producers, dominated the market - those anonymous and unknowable laws of supply and demand which once made all producers equally subject to the discipline of market forces had been supplanted by the visible hand of modern management: "There is little doubt that the idea of a (free market,' in the era of large corporations, is not quite the original capitalist idea." Some producers had more market power than, others: some persons (and this is how corporations are legally designated) were more equal than others. So everyone was not "free to choose," as Friedman would have it, simply because he or she inhabited a market society. Corporate capitalism remained a moral problem. For in "its concentration of assets and power-power to make economic decisions affecting the lives of tens of thousands of citizens - it seems to create a dangerous disharmony between the economic system and the political." P11 'The World Turned Inside Out' James Livingston
"Capitalism is the ownership and use of the concrete but dynamic elements in a society - what is commonly known as the means of production. A capitalist is someone who produces more capital through the production of the means he owns. This necessitates the periodic reinvestment of part of the capital earned into the repair, modernization and expansion of the means. Capitalism is therefore the ownership of an abstraction called capital, rendered concrete by its ownership of the means of production, which through actual production creates new capital.... However, capitalism as conceived today tends to revolve around something called the profit motive, even though profit is neither a cause of capitalism nor at the heart of the capitalist action. Profit is a useful result of the process, nothing more. As for the ownership of the means of production, this has been superseded by their management. And yet, to manage is to administer, which is a bureaucratic function. Alternately, there is a growing reliance upon the use of capital itself to produce new capital. But that is speculation, not production. Much of the development of the means of production is now rejected as unprofitable and, frankly, beneath the dignity of the modern manager, who would rather leave such labour and factory-intensive "dirty" work to Third World societies. Finally , the contemporary idea of capitalism grandly presents "service" as its new sophisticated manifestation. But the selling of one's own skills is not a capitalist art. And most of the jobs being created by the service industries are with the exception of the high-technology sector descendants of the pre-eighteenth-century commerce in trade and services." p360 'Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West' John Ralston Saul
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I am sure Rana was all about the pharmaceutical companies that developed the chemotherapy to cure her breast cancer. Oddly she is anti oil too which is what made the treatments responsible by providing money and health benefits. But, often times liberals are too short sighted to see past their idiocy.
If other liberals are saying it then it must be right is Rana's position
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Don't you people know that the leftardiots have muslimes terrorists to import to this country to attack is and that costs money
LOL, "as I said." Actually, corporate and corporatist are unrelated. The former is what I do, the latter is an ideology much like yours. To conclude one means the other is a non-sequitur. Actually, I'm a corporate capitalist. An entirely different thing. Corporatist is a form of socialism, the opposite of capitalist. I believe in free markets, you support government control, just like corporatists do. That just sailed over your head, didn't it?
Last edited:
From the guy who could only come up with "corporatist" without even knowing what it means...