Shamefull Republicans have vowed to support Trump if he is the nominee....

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
I hope, for the sake of our nation and in a renunciation of xenophobia and prejudice against religious minorities, and for the sake of the two party system, that the Republican nominees will renounce their pledge to support Trump if he is the eventual Nominee.
 
LOL. Are you going back to the first question at the first Republican debate?

Jeez Jarod, doesn't trolling ever get old?
 
Jarod said:
I hope, for the sake of our nation and in a renunciation of xenophobia and prejudice against religious minorities, and for the sake of the two party system, that the Republican nominees will renounce their pledge to support Trump if he is the eventual Nominee.
Click to expand...

Why do you ignorantly believe that this decerebrate post belongs on the "current events" board?

Has ambulance chasing got slow for you and you just wanna be heard?
 
Has Hillary or O'Malley said they won't support a socialist if one wins the party's nomination?
 
cawacko said:
I must have missed when they announced the winning Republican candidate.
Click to expand...

They have not announced a winner, however the Republicans have vowed to support the winning candidate.

The word "IF" indicates a future possibility that is not an absolute.

My question was, do you think they should reconsider that vow IF the winner is Trump.
 
Jarod said:
I hope, for the sake of our nation and in a renunciation of xenophobia and prejudice against religious minorities, and for the sake of the two party system, that the Republican nominees will renounce their pledge to support Trump if he is the eventual Nominee.
Click to expand...

Not no, but hell no.
 
cawacko said:
Has Hillary or O'Malley said they won't support a socialist if one wins the party's nomination?
Click to expand...

Are you comparing Democratic Socialism with what Trump is advocating?

Sorry, shameful on you if you are, Democratic Socialism is a legit form of government, not a xenophobic unsupported prejudice that goes counter to our Bill or Rights.
 
Jarod said:
They have not announced a winner, however the Republicans have vowed to support the winning candidate.

The word "IF" indicates a future possibility that is not an absolute.

My question was, do you think they should reconsider that vow IF the winner is Trump.
Click to expand...

So in the middle of a campaign fellow candidates should come out and say they won't support a man who they feel they will beat if he wins.

Like I said, your trolling sucks Jarod.
 
cawacko said:
So in the middle of a campaign fellow candidates should come out and say they won't support a man who they feel they will beat if he wins.

Like I said, your trolling sucks Jarod.
Click to expand...


In the middle of a campaign fellow candidates came out and say they would support a man who they feel they will beat if he wins.

So why not the opposite?

My trolling sucks because its not trolling.
If you are eating a hotdog, it will suck if you thought you were eating Chateaubrian.
 
cawacko said:
So in the middle of a campaign fellow candidates should come out and say they won't support a man who they feel they will beat if he wins.

Like I said, your trolling sucks Jarod.
Click to expand...

In a word...Y-E-S!

In the middle of a campaign, candidates should come out and shout from the rooftops how they will NOT support a candidate who runs on ideas that are not only illegal, but unconstitutional.
 
Jarod said:
In the middle of a campaign fellow candidates came out and say they would support a man who they feel they will beat if he wins.

So why not the opposite?

My trolling sucks because its not trolling.
If you are eating a hotdog, it will suck if you thought you were eating Chateaubrian.
Click to expand...

I see. You put shameful Republicans in your subject but you're not trolling.

Jennifer-Lawrence-ok-thumbs-up.gif
 
ZappasGuitar said:
In a word...Y-E-S!

In the middle of a campaign, candidates should come out and shout from the rooftops how they will NOT support a candidate who runs on ideas that are not only illegal, but unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

And people spoke out against him yesterday. LOL, funny watching you two partisan Democrats trying to tell Republican candidates what they should do.
 
cawacko said:
And people spoke out against him yesterday. LOL, funny watching you two partisan Democrats trying to tell Republican candidates what they should do.
Click to expand...

Frankly, the Democrats have little room to talk with Loretta Lynch trying to use the office of US AG to shut down free speech.

It's actually worse considering Trump is a private citizen and Lynch heads the DOJ.
 
Jarod said:
I hope, for the sake of our nation and in a renunciation of xenophobia and prejudice against religious minorities, and for the sake of the two party system, that the Republican nominees will renounce their pledge to support Trump if he is the eventual Nominee.
Click to expand...

:happening:
 
Jarod said:
I hope, for the sake of our nation and in a renunciation of xenophobia and prejudice against religious minorities, and for the sake of the two party system, that the Republican nominees will renounce their pledge to support Trump if he is the eventual Nominee.
Click to expand...
if Hillary is the alternative, not a chance....if forced to chose between liberal incompetence and Trump's bigotry, incompetence tips the balance in the Republican's favor.......

personally, I expect there is a way to fix the failed Obama vetting process which doesn't require blocking all Muslims........apparently both Trump and Obama believe there isn't........
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top