I don't recall saying that. But I also don't recall an amendment guaranteeing a right to fly.
The LARGER point here is that you didn't Make an accurate claim further, and this is cruscoal, the no fly list is apparently flawed.
IF your on the FBI's terrorist watch list, should you be free to own an AK?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I don't recall saying that. But I also don't recall an amendment guaranteeing a right to fly.
The LARGER point here is that you didn't Make an accurate claim further, and this is cruscoal, the no fly list is apparently flawed.
You're upset with bullets to a child's head, but ok with her brains being sucked out via abortion.
There is no right to own any gun you want, people are stopped from owning guns every day.
No, just like some gun liscences would not be. You have the right to travel or own a gun, but both can be reasonably regulated.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
just because the government does it and the people allow it, does not mean that there isn't a right to it. it's just being denied to them. this is the problem with lawyers, especially ones who worked in government. the 'law' is not always right.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
SOME licenses? and define 'reasonable', because i'm pretty damned sure that your idea of reasonable is nowhere near my idea of reasonable.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Seriously. Just like coal-fired power plants regs are 'reasonable'. Their reasonable if your an environmental extremist that wants to regulate them out of business.
I strongly agree with you that the law is not always right.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the problem is, you accept wrong laws when it suits your ideology.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
its easy......people who intend to use guns to kill other people should not be allowed to own guns.........
SmarterthanYou
rebel
better remove them from all the police departments then.
From your perspective, I understand that you think that. I simply do not believe the rights are or were ever intended to be absolute.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
i'm sure you can provide some documentation from ANY of the founders that dictated that belief to you, right? because shall make no law, shall not be infringed, etc. were pretty clear cut to the people that voted on ratification.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Nothing to prevent it. We can work towards minimizing the occurrences, but banning certain types of guns is not going to work.
1) We can stop glorifying the idiots who commit mass murder. Stop plastering their names and photos all over the media (unless they are at large). That is the very attention they seek. I don't believe they are terrorists as they are in it for self glorification and nothing more.
2) People in the media and the gun grabbers always focus on guns used in mass murders. Yet barely utter a breath regarding the nonstop gang violence that takes far more lives each year. Why is that?
3) But no matter what, you cannot revert to the guilty until proven innocent mindset.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Yes, I am aware of that. My point to the retard was that she was wrong to say the other methods weren't as effective/efficient. Another point is that you can take away a TOOL, but if a person is determined to kill someone... they will simply find another tool.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I suspect you never read the constitution.
It has very specific wording that implies just that.
Should Ted Bundy have been allowed an AK in his prison cell? Cuz if the right is absolute, he should have.
So you believe that the Constitution requires that we allow the worst of the worst American criminals access to AK-47's?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
strawman argument.