Why are the R's afraid to condemn terrorism?

The question I have is why liberals are so quick to compare one nutjob to a religious jihad that has millions of supporters who are killing millions and performing genocide of Christians in the ME? Are they really that desperate to find some moral comparison to justify their central condemnation of conservatives who name themselves Christians?
 
Damocles said:
The question I have is why liberals are so quick to compare one nutjob to a religious jihad that has millions of supporters who are killing millions and performing genocide of Christians in the ME? Are they really that desperate to find some moral comparison to justify their central condemnation of conservatives who name themselves Christians?
Click to expand...

:dunno:

Why are conservatives so quick to insist that a few nutjobs in a religious jihad (that allegedly has millions of supporters) represent 1.6 billion Muslims?
 
Damocles said:
Yup. And every Christian I know condemns any idiot who does something like this. While 18% of Muslims in a country like Indonesia ("Moderate") this ISIS is the shizmet. Although the King of Jordan has it right.

One insane nutjob does not a terrorist movement make, though. As I said, imagine if even 14% of Christians were willing to kill you for not believing their form of Christianity...
Click to expand...

It is funny watching Lesion Troll try to compare these incidents. Hilarious indeed. His desperation is palpable.
 
Legion Troll said:
:dunno:

Why are conservatives so quick to insist that a few nutjobs in a religious jihad that supposedly has millions of supporters represent 1.6 billion Muslims?
Click to expand...

They aren't. Though they are correct to note that they are religious nutjobs in a religious jihad, while one lone nut does not a terrorist movement make.

The moral equivalency is false and Christians condemn this man, so what are desperate leftists to do?

:dunno:
 
Legion Troll said:
They are.
Click to expand...

They aren't. Talking about Islamic Radical Terrorism does not condemn an entire religion, just those millions willing to kill you because you don't believe in their particular brand of Islam.


There is no rightwing terrorist movement?

But a few nutjobs make an Islamic terrorist movement, therefore all Muslims are complicit and suspect?
Click to expand...

Millions are not "a few". Not even in your world.
 
Damocles said:
They aren't. Talking about Islamic Radical Terrorism does not condemn an entire religion, just those millions willing to kill you because you don't believe in their particular brand of Islam.
Click to expand...

They are. GOP presidential candidates have characterized all Muslims as dangerous, and stating that a Muslim should not ever be president.

Damocles said:
Millions are not "a few". Not even in your world.
Click to expand...

What "millions"? Are you claiming that "millions" of Muslims are killing people because they don't believe in their particular brand of Islam?
 
Damocles said:
The question I have is why liberals are so quick to compare one nutjob to a religious jihad that has millions of supporters who are killing millions and performing genocide of Christians in the ME? Are they really that desperate to find some moral comparison to justify their central condemnation of conservatives who name themselves Christians?
Click to expand...

In a word, yes.

I'm not even sure this guy rates as a terrorist since he seems a little loony.
 
Damocles said:
They aren't. Talking about Islamic Radical Terrorism does not condemn an entire religion, just those millions willing to kill you because you don't believe in their particular brand of Islam.
Wow even yuppie Buddhist are racist NRA jihadist




Millions are not "a few". Not even in your world.
Click to expand...
wtf
 
The Dude said:
Even yuppie Buddhist are racist
Click to expand...

People like Damo and their popguns are the only thing standing between you and beheading by millions of Muslims thirsting for your blood, apparently.

Obama is one of them and wants to jihad your ass with Sharia law. :eek2:
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
In a word, yes.

I'm not even sure this guy rates as a terrorist since he seems a little loony.
Click to expand...
Well, according to the left if anybody does something like this for a religious reason it is a terrorism "movement" come upon us... unless they are Muslims on a military base, or Muslims lining up and slaughtering people for the "crime" of Christianity, or throwing the local homosexual from a building... then it's just a "few" people rather than a movement.

It is clear that Muslims as a general rule condemn these actions and hold them in an unfavorable view:

http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/07/01/concerns-about-islamic-extremism-on-the-rise-in-middle-east/

Many in the US are unaware of this as it is under reported. And no, I do not know why it is under reported, or reported ineffectively.

However, the percentages that support these groups is still very high. You'd be hard-pressed to find even a percentage who support this nutjob killing people at Planned Parenthood... but too often you'll see as high as 25% supporting terrorist groups in ME nations.
 
Interesting that them liberals here have decided that this was all about an attack on planned parenthood, when it's been reported, the shooter only ran into that building to escape from the police who engaged him at the Bank near there. He didn't attack the planned parenthood facility. Until
the police can investigate what exactly what this guy's motives were, shouldn't libtards keep their asses, er.. assumptions from hanging out?
 
Damocles said:
Well, according to the left if anybody does something like this for a religious reason it is a terrorism "movement" come upon us...
Click to expand...

It is? Perhaps you can cite an example of "the left" saying that.

Damocles said:
unless they are Muslims on a military base, or Muslims lining up and slaughtering people for the "crime" of Christianity, or throwing the local homosexual from a building... then it's just a "few" people rather than a movement.
Click to expand...

A few people doing anything is just a few people doing something, unless it's a few Muslims on a military base, or Muslims lining up and slaughtering people for the "crime" of Christianity, or throwing the local homosexual from a building... then it's a "movement" rather than a few people doing it, right?

Damocles said:
It is clear that Muslims as a general rule condemn these actions and hold them in an unfavorable view: http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/07/01/concerns-about-islamic-extremism-on-the-rise-in-middle-east/ Many in the US are unaware of this as it is under reported. And no, I do not know why it is under reported, or reported ineffectively.
Click to expand...

They've been privy to the same information that you have. They are are willfully ignorant.

Damocles said:
You'd be hard-pressed to find even a percentage who support this nutjob killing people at Planned Parenthood... but too often you'll see as high as 25% supporting terrorist groups in ME nations.
Click to expand...

I see, a non-Muslim is a "nutjob", but Muslim nutjobs are "terrorists".

Are you claiming that nobody on the right supports killing people at Planned Parenthood?
 
Damocles said:
I don't think any conservatives are afraid of condemning the man. Imagine if even 14% of Christians were willing to kill you for not believing their version of the religion...
Click to expand...

Then why are the republicans remaining silent?
 
greeneyedlady said:
Interesting that them liberals here have decided that this was all about an attack on planned parenthood, when it's been reported, the shooter only ran into that building to escape from the police who engaged him at the Bank near there. He didn't attack the planned parenthood facility.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you could share the source of that startling revelation. I'm guessing Breitbart...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top