DEBATE: if alcohol is legal, why shouldn't marijuana be?

USFREEDOM911 said:
But it's still illegal, under Federal guide lines
Click to expand...
It is an unjust law. I am practicing civil disobediance. The Feds have also said they will not target medical patients.
Are you done reciting your trivial, irrelevant and incorrect statements yet?

We all understand that being a union prison guard you drank the semen that the union fed you about reefer and believe what you are saying, but no one else does, except other statist fucks as stupid as you. (most of them)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
1 - So you're now saying that you didn't post:



2 - Scares you; HUH!

3 - If they fail the drug test, then they won't have a job.

4 - Don't believe I ever said that; but you are free to make another attempt.
Click to expand...

No. I said it's not a real crime and explained that there is no victim or injured party and the law serves no valid state interest.

No.

That's a relation to the drug test/drug war, not drug use, and their ability to get a job. Not all jobs have drug tests. They could fail for alcohol too. Some jobs have physicals. Can the state make it a crime to do anything that might cause you to fail those?
 
Last edited:
Rune said:
It is an unjust law. I am practicing civil disobediance. The Feds have also said they will not target medical patients.
Are you done reciting your trivial, irrelevant and incorrect statements yet?

We all understand that being a union prison guard you drank the semen that the union fed you about reefer and believe what you are saying, but no one else does, except other statist fucks as stupid as you. (most of them)
Click to expand...

I can always tell when I've forced a liberal to question their beliefs.
It's when they have nothing left and need to resort to making an attempt to denigrate.
Plus it's when their homophobic beliefs rise to the surface. :)
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
No. I said it's not a real crime and explained that there is no victim or injured party and the law serves no valid state interest.

No.

That's a relation to the drug test/drug war, not drug use, and their ability to get a job. Not all jobs have drug tests. They could fail for alcohol too. Some jobs have physicals. Can the state make it a crime to do anything that might cause you to fail those?
Click to expand...

So your only ability to offer a rebuttal, is to stick your fingers in your ears and loudly proclaim "NU-UH"!!
:chesh:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I can always tell when I've forced a liberal to question their beliefs.
It's when they have nothing left and need to resort to making an attempt to denigrate.
Plus it's when their homophobic beliefs rise to the surface. :)
Click to expand...
Burn of the day right there. Woot!
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But it's not considered "Commerce", at this time, under Federal Law. :)
Click to expand...

Why should the citizens in the several States fear persecution for exercising their natural rights, secured in State Constitutions regarding acquiring and possessing even controversial forms of private property?

All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
Click to expand...
 
SmarterthanYou said:
it may not be considered commerce, but the supremes have said that it affects commerce
Click to expand...

Here is one civil concern for the Electorate of the United States in their office of public trust:

A power to destroy the freedom of the press, the trial by jury, or even to regulate the course of descents, or the forms of conveyances, must be very singularly expressed by the terms "to raise money for the general welfare."
Click to expand...

The Power to Regulate cannot be a power to Prohibit without that power being delegated by the People.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So your only ability to offer a rebuttal, is to stick your fingers in your ears and loudly proclaim "NU-UH"!!
:chesh:
Click to expand...


What rebuttal? This was my original point. Your "rebuttal" that there are people incarcerated is not responsive to the point it is beside it. I think you are projecting.
 
danielpalos said:
Why should the citizens in the several States fear persecution for exercising their natural rights, secured in State Constitutions regarding acquiring and possessing even controversial forms of private property?
Click to expand...

Complain all you want; but at the moment, it's illegal under Federal law.
 
Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
What rebuttal? This was my original point. Your "rebuttal" that there are people incarcerated is not responsive to the point it is beside it. I think you are projecting.
Click to expand...

You complained about people being arrested for MJ usage and I correlated it with people being arrested for DUI's.
You countered with MJ not being a crime and I showed that it still is.
Now you want to argue that it shouldn't be and I offered that neither should be DUI's, unless they've hurt someone.
Talking with you is like playing a game of Pong; but you keep wanting to change the size of the paddles.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Complain all you want; but at the moment, it's illegal under Federal law.
Click to expand...

You may be misunderstanding the concept.

There is no Appeal to Ignorance of our own laws. The social Power to Prohibit forms of Commerce doesn't exist if that power is no longer delegated to our federal Congress.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Click to expand...

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top