NIMBY Fracking!

so I was right, that it's ok to NIMBY when you're a democrat. thanks for exposing your hypocritical partisanship ROFL

The libertarian lunkhead strikes again!

Obviously you didn't read beyond what Fox News (or whatever lame neocon/teabagger news source you use) told you. Kennedy and company pointed to total disruption of the local eco-system for the size of the project proposed. Tillerson's ONLY beef is that there's going to be a lot of noise and it won't look nice.

Get off your brain and do some honest research before your fingers hit the keys next time, chuckles.
 
The libertarian lunkhead strikes again!

Obviously you didn't read beyond what Fox News (or whatever lame neocon/teabagger news source you use) told you. Kennedy and company pointed to total disruption of the local eco-system for the size of the project proposed. Tillerson's ONLY beef is that there's going to be a lot of noise and it won't look nice.

Get off your brain and do some honest research before your fingers hit the keys next time, chuckles.

What happened to all that tritium from the Indian Point that was causing untold damage a while back?
 
The libertarian lunkhead strikes again!

Obviously you didn't read beyond what Fox News (or whatever lame neocon/teabagger news source you use) told you. Kennedy and company pointed to total disruption of the local eco-system for the size of the project proposed. Tillerson's ONLY beef is that there's going to be a lot of noise and it won't look nice.

Get off your brain and do some honest research before your fingers hit the keys next time, chuckles.

and now you're just stupid
 
What happened to all that tritium from the Indian Point that was causing untold damage a while back?

What happened to your intellectual honesty? Seems when proven wrong on one point, you change the subject like a good little neocon/teabagger lackey.

but the FACTS will always be your undoing. Here's what came down on this issue:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/25nukewe.html

But keep this in mind:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Indian_Point_(Nuclear_Power_Station)


Now, anything else on the subject title of this thread?
 
this shows that you know absolutely nothing about Libertarianism

Given YOUR example, I have an accurate assessment of the "logic" used by you clods to justify any and every mental flatulence you have. And once accurately confronted with contrary facts that you cannot refute, you merely run away, change the subject or just babble personal attacks,as you are now.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
The libertarian lunkhead strikes again!

Obviously you didn't read beyond what Fox News (or whatever lame neocon/teabagger news source you use) told you. Kennedy and company pointed to total disruption of the local eco-system for the size of the project proposed. Tillerson's ONLY beef is that there's going to be a lot of noise and it won't look nice.

Get off your brain and do some honest research before your fingers hit the keys next time, chuckles.

and now you're just stupid

Projecting again, bunky? Seems YOU don't have the intellectual courage and honesty to merely acknowledge the FACTS I reference. Your opinion means nothing....I can provide proof of what I say. Can you?
 
Given YOUR example, I have an accurate assessment of the "logic" used by you clods to justify any and every mental flatulence you have. And once accurately confronted with contrary facts that you cannot refute, you merely run away, change the subject or just babble personal attacks,as you are now.
i've done nothing of the sort. I simply refuse to debate with someone who has generated their own sets of facts that have nothing to do with reality based upon their mistaken belief that liberals know best and can do no wrong.
 
What happened to your intellectual honesty? Seems when proven wrong on one point, you change the subject like a good little neocon/teabagger lackey.

but the FACTS will always be your undoing. Here's what came down on this issue:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/25nukewe.html

But keep this in mind:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Indian_Point_(Nuclear_Power_Station)


Now, anything else on the subject title of this thread?

It all turned out to be piss and wind hyped up by econuts, which is why it has dropped off the radar.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Given YOUR example, I have an accurate assessment of the "logic" used by you clods to justify any and every mental flatulence you have. And once accurately confronted with contrary facts that you cannot refute, you merely run away, change the subject or just babble personal attacks,as you are now.

i've done nothing of the sort. I simply refuse to debate with someone who has generated their own sets of facts that have nothing to do with reality based upon their mistaken belief that liberals know best and can do no wrong.


The chronology of the posts makes you out to be a liar and a fool, STY. I've provided documentation when and where needed. You have not. All you've done is bark your opinion, supposition and conjecture. You don't even have the cojones to acknowledge the FACTS that I reference, let alone debate them.

And in fantastic display of stupidity, YOU claim to refuse to debate while consistently posting rebuttals. But you are correct...you are not debating, just being insipidly stubborn, as your next regurgitation will show.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What happened to your intellectual honesty? Seems when proven wrong on one point, you change the subject like a good little neocon/teabagger lackey.

but the FACTS will always be your undoing. Here's what came down on this issue:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/ny.../25nukewe.html

But keep this in mind:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...wer_Station)


Now, anything else on the subject title of this thread?


It all turned out to be piss and wind hyped up by econuts, which is why it has dropped off the radar.

Translation: FACTS proved Abraxas to be wrong on his assertions and statements, so now in frustration he just blurts out his opinion as if it's on par with said fax. This is typical of the willfully ignorant neocon/teabagger peanut gallery who knee jerk defend what they perceive to be "conservative" values. Bottom line: the subject title post is valid and remains so....much to the anger of folk like Abraxas. I leave him to his next predictable, empty retort.
 
Ahhh, what's the matter toodles? Truth too much for ya?

Nope. Don't care. I have family who have cleaned up from fracking. I say God bless them. You should be on bended knee thawing them for sacrificing their property on your behalf.

One relative got $1.5 million just to lease their land with a potential for $10,000/month royalty. Isn't life grand?

Now go frack yourslef
 
Nope. Don't care. I have family who have cleaned up from fracking. I say God bless them. You should be on bended knee thawing them for sacrificing their property on your behalf.

One relative got $1.5 million just to lease their land with a potential for $10,000/month royalty. Isn't life grand?

Now go frack yourslef

Spoken like a true short sighted, greedy little neocon/teabagger asshole.

Environment and everyone else be damned for your profit, ehh bunky? You can't handle the truth, like your buddies

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?61653-NIMBY-Fracking!&p=1466204#post1466204

Yeah, think your money will buy you clean water and fresh air forever? Dope.
 
Spoken like a true short sighted, greedy little neocon/teabagger asshole.

Environment and everyone else be damned for your profit, ehh bunky? You can't handle the truth, like your buddies

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?61653-NIMBY-Fracking!&p=1466204#post1466204

Yeah, think your money will buy you clean water and fresh air forever? Dope.

Well first of all it wasn't me. It was a relative. But yeah, fuck you. Their money can buy all the fresh water they want.

Now frack off
 
Back
Top