Thursday at 9 on MSNBC the truth will be told

maineman said:
Bullshit. Saddam was doing three things in 2003 better than we could do them and it would have been well worth our while to let him continue to do those things and free our resources for defeating Islamic extremist terrorism.
1. He kept sunnis and shi'ites from slaughtering one another.
2. He kept Al Qaeda from using Iraq as a staging ground and a recruiting goldmine
3. He kept the Iranians and their aspirations of regional hegemony in check.
Click to expand...

and he kept his dogs well fed......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
they didn't have them to begin with, Cunt?......how were they counted and inventoried in 1993 if they weren't there at the time?......
Click to expand...

What someone had a decade prior is no real indication of what they have today.... and chemical weapons sitting around for a couple of decades are not even really weapons anymore.... just cans of goo.... the fact remains, he didn't have them when we invaded him to take the arms away from him. That was, according to the chimp whose fecal material you perpetually have crusting your nose, our ONLY mission. We invaded Iraq for one reason.... to disarm him of weapons it turned out he didn't even have. And you think that was a SMART move??

What a brown nosing moron!
 
maineman said:
What someone had a decade prior is no real indication of what they have today.... and chemical weapons sitting around for a couple of decades are not even really weapons anymore.... just cans of goo.... the fact remains, he didn't have them when we invaded him to take the arms away from him. That was, according to the chimp whose fecal material you perpetually have crusting your nose, our ONLY mission. We invaded Iraq for one reason.... to disarm him of weapons it turned out he didn't even have. And you think that was a SMART move??
Click to expand...

well, lets see.....Gulf War One was ended with a truce that required Saddam get rid of his WMD......they were counted and identified......was it a smart thing to do to make sure he got rid of the WMD that were counted and identified, after he agreed to get rid of them.....I'm going to go with a yes on that one.......

there was no evidence he had ever done so......was it a smart thing to try to find out if he had done it?........I'm going to go with a yes on that one too.....

Would it have been a smart thing to pretend we knew what was happening when we didn't?......that was the liberal agenda......I think that's a no......

would it have been a smart thing to pretend things would get better if we just waited another six or seven years?.......that was also the liberal agenda......I also think that's a no......

was it a smart idea to invade to disarm him of the weapons which had been inventoried and remained unaccounted for?.......obviously.....

who would have thought Saddam was either 1) stupid enough to threaten us with weapons he didn't have or 2) stupid enough to destroy the weapons in secret.....

I wonder if that brown stuff you think is on my nose is actually the stuff that fills your cranium........
 
maineman said:
are you suggesting that his dogs were a standby reason to invade? if the WMD thing didn't pan out? What's a trillion dollars solving a pet problem when OBL is still on the loose? Eh, Einstein?
Click to expand...

of course not.....not for a moment would I think a liberal would be concerned about Saddam feeding people to his dogs.....after all, they aren't the brown people THEY own.......the brown people liberals own live in American ghettos.....
 
why weren't you all up in the government's grill to go stop the genocide in Rwanda or the atrocities of Idi Amin or the atrocities of the Shah of Iran? Why, when we really should have been worried about where the fuck Al Qaeda was and how in the fuck we were going to neutralize them, were you all bleeding heart compassionate about the poor folks in Iraq, when you're boys had been perfectly happy to deal with him for decades before that? hypocrite.
 
twenty year old canisters of degraded goo.... yeah... when AQ and OBL are on the loose, it makes all the fucking sense in the WORLD to waste a trillion dollars and suffer 40K casualties ourselves, and cause well over two hundred thousand civilian casualties in Iraq for twenty year old canisters of degraded goo. smart stuff.
 
maineman said:
why weren't you all up in the government's grill to go stop the genocide in Rwanda
Click to expand...

you have me there....I've always respected you greatly for going to Rawanda and feeding the orphans oatmeal out of your own spoon.....and when you stepped in from of that poor woman and offered to let the UN official rape you instead of her it brought a tear to my eye.......
 
Doesn't PMP make a big deal about being a Christian?

Like a lot of so-called Christians I've seen, he is infinitely more concerned about 2 people who love each other & who happen to be the same sex, than he is about 10's of thousands of innocents getting slaughtered unnecessarily.
 
maineman said:
twenty year old canisters of degraded goo.... yeah... when AQ and OBL are on the loose, it makes all the fucking sense in the WORLD to waste a trillion dollars and suffer 40K casualties ourselves, and cause well over two hundred thousand civilian casualties in Iraq for twenty year old canisters of degraded goo. smart stuff.
Click to expand...

yeah it would have been so much smarter to have dropped the whole thing and tell Saddam, "hey remember that cease fire agreement from 93? Screw it, it was all a big joke! Take Kuwait and partay, baby"........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
ROFL.....nothing like letting the liberals get tangled in their own memes regarding the Iraq war......
Click to expand...

Not sure how a brain would have to work to arrive at that conclusion.

My position has been consistent since 2002. On this thread alone, you've moved the goalposts about 3 times.

You righties don't have a leg to stand on w/ Iraq. Biggest foreign policy blunder in modern times.

Give me your best LOL now.
 
Thing1 said:
I was actually going to qualify it for Truthie, since you don't represent most righties.

You're definitely the most shameless Bush apologist that I've ever seen - and I watch Fox, so that's saying something.
Click to expand...

It’s always been amusing to me that after leftist dunces get the facts shoved in their faces; they fall back to the Bush apologist memes.

You really are a dumbass.
 
maineman said:
What someone had a decade prior is no real indication of what they have today.... and chemical weapons sitting around for a couple of decades are not even really weapons anymore.... just cans of goo.... the fact remains, he didn't have them when we invaded him to take the arms away from him. That was, according to the chimp whose fecal material you perpetually have crusting your nose, our ONLY mission. We invaded Iraq for one reason.... to disarm him of weapons it turned out he didn't even have. And you think that was a SMART move??

What a brown nosing moron!
Click to expand...

LMAO

:facepalm:
 
Truth Detector said:
It’s always been amusing to me that after leftist dunces get the facts shoved in their faces; they fall back to the Bush apologist memes.

You really are a dumbass.
Click to expand...

To be fair, I only call someone a Bush apologist if they spend their entire day apologizing profusely for Bush, and are dedicated to making excuses for the man.

Now, give me your best "you so stupid!" Maybe PMP can follow it with a blistering "lol," and NOVA can chime in with a "hits just keep comin'".

Regular Algonquin round table here w/ you righties...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top