Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Too bad you didn't check Blix's testimony to Congress 3 weeks before we invaded.
Access to all suspected sites. We didn't need to invade. But keep apologizing for Bush.
Thursday at 9 on MSNBC the truth will be told
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Too bad you didn't check Blix's testimony to Congress 3 weeks before we invaded.
Access to all suspected sites. We didn't need to invade. But keep apologizing for Bush.
maineman
Banned
there is confidence, and then, there is absolute certainty. two different things.
Kerry said that a deadly arsenal in Saddam's hands is a real threat to our security. He did not, however, say that Saddam had such an arsenal in his hands. Words... in the hands of experts.... make fools out of pollywog landlubbers like you.
In fact, Senator Clinton was wrong about AQ members... Saddam gave aid and comfort to Zarqawi, but that was before he affiliated himself with AQ.
So you need more convincing to face the truth.....
Senator John Kerry, "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force.
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein.
"....we know after Desert Fox failed to re-accept them, that he has continued to build those weapons"
John Kerry (MA) 10/9/2002
(Dis-arm Saddam from what?...weapons he doesn't possess, perhaps?...Is this you story?)
(Continue to build what, weapons he never had?....this is what your mush-brain tells you )
“Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them, not once, but repeatedly.
The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again.”
- Bill Clinton , December 16, 1998.
(so Pres. Clinton thought Saddam would be using WMD he didn't have?....Is that you story?)
“In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now — a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers, or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed. If we fail to respond today, Saddam, and all those who would follow in his footsteps, will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council, and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program.”
- Bill Clinton , February 17, 1998.
( a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction---the very kind of threat Iraq poses now)
"We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them on his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to
build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal"
Senator John Edwards (NC) 10/10/2002
(We KNOW he has WMD?)
"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction"
Dick Gephardt (MO) Sept. 2002
(Iraq and its WMD?)
http://tinyurl.com/k89xpcz
There is nothing ambiguous about any of these quotes and what the speaker in saying, nothing.
You really ought to stop making as ass of yourself, even I'm embarrassed for you....
Last edited:
Odd, that when its a Democrat speaking, they are wrong, but when a Republican speaks, they are lying.....odd indeed
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I not only checked it but provided you with the entire transcript......go back to page ten, read the post and explain your lie......"unfettered"......lol......
maineman
Banned
it's only a lie when you know what you are saying is not true at the time you are saying it.
maineman
Banned
there is nothing ambiguous about those quotes... and, as I have said, none of them states in terms of absolute certainty that Saddam possessed stockpiles of WMD's.
Coming from a dunce who never uses the reply with quote function; dumbass.
No matter how stupid you look and how wrong you are, you will continue removing any doubt what a dishonest asshole you are. Yay you!
maineman
Banned
and AGAIN... there is a definable difference between the assertion of fact and the expression of an opinion.
Of course you have noting but opinion because the facts do not support your dimwitted claims and this idiotic "without certainty" stupidity.
Dumbass.
maineman
Banned
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction."
Dick Cheney August 26, 2002
Simply stated, that was a lie that he KNEW to be a lie even as he spoke it. There were always varying degrees of doubt concerning that topic. The NIEs all contained caveats and qualifiers that laid out the reasons for those doubts.... Bush knew that. Cheney knew that. To then say, "THERE IS NO DOUBT" is lying. pure and simple.
Add that lie to Cheney's lie about Saddam's boys and Al Qaeda meeting in Prague BEFORE 9/11.... two lies that, together, scared the shit out of lots of Americans.... JUST the sort of mis-leadership that the GOP remains proud of to this day.
Dick Cheney August 26, 2002
Simply stated, that was a lie that he KNEW to be a lie even as he spoke it. There were always varying degrees of doubt concerning that topic. The NIEs all contained caveats and qualifiers that laid out the reasons for those doubts.... Bush knew that. Cheney knew that. To then say, "THERE IS NO DOUBT" is lying. pure and simple.
Add that lie to Cheney's lie about Saddam's boys and Al Qaeda meeting in Prague BEFORE 9/11.... two lies that, together, scared the shit out of lots of Americans.... JUST the sort of mis-leadership that the GOP remains proud of to this day.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
LOL
Did you even read through these?
Because you were being such a snit about it, I read through all of them, and went back to the January report. In the January report, he said the following:
"The most important point to make is that access has been provided to all sites we have wanted to inspect."
So, the contention that there had been "little progress" since the February report is kind of hilarious. He also reiterates in the March report that inspectors had access to every site, and that Iraq was cooperating.
So, thanks for posting these links. They back up what the left has argued for years: insepctions were working, and there was no need to rush to war.
I'll never figure you idiot Bush apologists out.
....because you, an incredibly uninformed hyper partisan dumbass, says so regardless of the facts and the evidence..
Here we are more than a decade later still suffering the stupidity of leftist dumbasses who want to keep re-inventing history for no better purpose than to remove any doubt what rabid lunatics they are; yay you!
Only repugnant lunatic assholes can believe that men like Cheney and Bush would place the men and women of the military at risk to satisfy their ego.
But of course for morons like you and the Thing1; it never occurs to you to ask yourselves what Bush and Cheney had to gain by lying. But alas, if you believe that Cheney and Bush are as stupid as you and your dimwitted leftist pals are, then of course you would think they were too dumb to know the political ramifications of inventing the WMD argument.
Only lunatic dunces on the left like you and your liberal pals can argue that Bush was such a dummy, but so damned cunning that he fooled a bunch of highly intellectual Democrats like Kerry and 36 other nations leaders into believing his lie.
It is so incredibly stupid and preposterous that only real retards like you can promote such a painfully stupid argument.
What a bunch of clueless morons.
See above shit-for-brains; it applies to you as well.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Bush told a ghostwriter in the '90's that a President couldn't achieve "greatness" without a war. There was definitely an aspect of ego-trip for him.
Regardless, he wasn't careful w/ the use of our military; he didn't pore over every option and wait until it was a last resort. He rushed to war; he was careless, and reckless, and wrong. He told terrorists to "bring 'em on" with our young men & women in harm's way. He was a terrible CIC.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
LOL
I guess a facepalm that's been floating around message boards for a decade or so is as creative as it gets for you & that ten cent head of yours.
I guess a facepalm that's been floating around message boards for a decade or so is as creative as it gets for you & that ten cent head of yours.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
if you think he said the inspections were working, then YOU were the one who hasn't read the reports.....meanwhile, where's the statement that they had "unfettered access"?.......aren't you going to admit you made it up?......